Passive DNS

Spamhaus Passive DNS (Deteqtive) is a passive DNS investigation platform that provides historical and near-real-time DNS record visibility and domain↔IP↔nameserver pivots to support attribution, timeline reconstruction, and investigative workflows.

Website

MarketsThreat Intelligence Platforms

01Competitive Landscape

| Aspect | Spamhaus Passive DNS / Deteqtive | DomainTools Iris Investigate (incl. passive DNS datasets) | SecurityTrails (historical DNS / inventory) | |--------|----------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------| | Starting Price | Not publicly listed; sales-led; limited-duration API trial available | Personal/Enterprise tiers exist; enterprise pricing typically gated to sales | Pricing varies by plan; some vendors provide self-serve tiers (buyers should verify current vendor sites) | | Primary Fit | DNS-centric investigations tied to spam/abuse intelligence; analysts seeking Spamhaus-derived signals | Broad domain investigation workflows with pivot engines and enrichment | Internet inventory lookups and DNS history for attack-surface work | | Key Strength | Linkage to Spamhaus’ DNS, IP, and domain reputation datasets; focus on investigation-centric passive DNS intelligence | Mature investigation workflow and an ecosystem around domain intelligence | Broad “inventory” framing and historical record coverage | | Key Weakness | Limited transparent pricing; limited accessible third-party reviews specific to the product; unclear breadth beyond DNS pivots | Perception of high cost and complex quota/rate-limit models in some offerings | May not include the same curated abuse-reputation context as threat-intel-first vendors | - Direct competitors and key differentiators - DomainTools emphasizes an integrated platform spanning detection, enrichment, and investigation and includes passive DNS datasets within enterprise packages. - RiskIQ PassiveTotal connects disparate datasets for enrichment and external threat analysis and has broader analyst-facing coverage in some analyst review corpora. - SecurityTrails focuses on current and historical internet records and is often positioned for attack-surface visibility. - Feature comparison: where Spamhaus may excel vs lag - Potential strengths: - Integration with Spamhaus’ broader abuse reputation datasets and a focus on DNS-centric investigative workflows - Multiple consumption methods (API and feed-based delivery) - Potential weaknesses: - Fewer publicly visible third-party validations or reviews specific to Deteqtive - Less clarity in public documentation on full-stack enrichment beyond DNS (WHOIS/RDAP, certificates, web crawl artifacts) - Pricing comparison: value proposition vs alternatives - Spamhaus: sales-led pricing with a limited-duration API trial to enable technical evaluation. - DomainTools: membership models and enterprise packages; exact costs usually gated to sales. - SecurityTrails: often offers self-serve tiers; buyers should verify current vendor pricing. - Market share and adoption trends - Not quantified in the public sources reviewed for this research pass.

01Competitive Landscape

Aspect	Spamhaus Passive DNS / Deteqtive	DomainTools Iris Investigate (incl. passive DNS datasets)	SecurityTrails (historical DNS / inventory)
Starting Price	Not publicly listed; sales-led; limited-duration API trial available	Personal/Enterprise tiers exist; enterprise pricing typically gated to sales	Pricing varies by plan; some vendors provide self-serve tiers (buyers should verify current vendor sites)
Primary Fit	DNS-centric investigations tied to spam/abuse intelligence; analysts seeking Spamhaus-derived signals	Broad domain investigation workflows with pivot engines and enrichment	Internet inventory lookups and DNS history for attack-surface work
Key Strength	Linkage to Spamhaus’ DNS, IP, and domain reputation datasets; focus on investigation-centric passive DNS intelligence	Mature investigation workflow and an ecosystem around domain intelligence	Broad “inventory” framing and historical record coverage
Key Weakness	Limited transparent pricing; limited accessible third-party reviews specific to the product; unclear breadth beyond DNS pivots	Perception of high cost and complex quota/rate-limit models in some offerings	May not include the same curated abuse-reputation context as threat-intel-first vendors

Direct competitors and key differentiators
- DomainTools emphasizes an integrated platform spanning detection, enrichment, and investigation and includes passive DNS datasets within enterprise packages.
- RiskIQ PassiveTotal connects disparate datasets for enrichment and external threat analysis and has broader analyst-facing coverage in some analyst review corpora.
- SecurityTrails focuses on current and historical internet records and is often positioned for attack-surface visibility.
Feature comparison: where Spamhaus may excel vs lag
- Potential strengths:
  - Integration with Spamhaus’ broader abuse reputation datasets and a focus on DNS-centric investigative workflows
  - Multiple consumption methods (API and feed-based delivery)
- Potential weaknesses:
  - Fewer publicly visible third-party validations or reviews specific to Deteqtive
  - Less clarity in public documentation on full-stack enrichment beyond DNS (WHOIS/RDAP, certificates, web crawl artifacts)
Pricing comparison: value proposition vs alternatives
- Spamhaus: sales-led pricing with a limited-duration API trial to enable technical evaluation.
- DomainTools: membership models and enterprise packages; exact costs usually gated to sales.
- SecurityTrails: often offers self-serve tiers; buyers should verify current vendor pricing.
Market share and adoption trends
- Not quantified in the public sources reviewed for this research pass.

Aspect

Spamhaus Passive DNS / Deteqtive

DomainTools Iris Investigate (incl. passive DNS datasets)

SecurityTrails (historical DNS / inventory)

Starting Price

Not publicly listed; sales-led; limited-duration API trial available

Personal/Enterprise tiers exist; enterprise pricing typically gated to sales

Pricing varies by plan; some vendors provide self-serve tiers (buyers should verify current vendor sites)

Primary Fit

DNS-centric investigations tied to spam/abuse intelligence; analysts seeking Spamhaus-derived signals

Broad domain investigation workflows with pivot engines and enrichment

Internet inventory lookups and DNS history for attack-surface work

Key Strength

Linkage to Spamhaus’ DNS, IP, and domain reputation datasets; focus on investigation-centric passive DNS intelligence

Mature investigation workflow and an ecosystem around domain intelligence

Broad “inventory” framing and historical record coverage

Key Weakness

Limited transparent pricing; limited accessible third-party reviews specific to the product; unclear breadth beyond DNS pivots

Perception of high cost and complex quota/rate-limit models in some offerings

May not include the same curated abuse-reputation context as threat-intel-first vendors