Starhive

Starhive vs Atlassian JSM Assets - Starhive’s Jira integration is positioned to address a common concern where Assets/CMDB capabilities are tied to higher-cost Jira plans. Starhive targets teams that want asset/context capabilities for Jira Cloud without upgrading Jira Service Management tiers. - Atlassian’s strengths include broad, mature ITSM workflows (incident/problem/change), extensive integrations, and established platform capabilities. Organizations should determine whether Starhive is intended to replace those ITSM workflows or to act as an adjacent CMDB/context layer. Starhive vs Lansweeper - Starhive commonly operates alongside Lansweeper rather than replacing it: - Lansweeper: discovery and inventory. - Starhive: enrichment, business context, and relationships with portals/apps. - Using both tools implies integration work and cost for two products. Starhive vs Device42 - Device42 focuses on deep infrastructure discovery, dependency mapping, and enterprise CMDB maturity. - Starhive focuses on no/low-code flexibility, unlimited users, and application building on top of a relational object store. - Organizations with highly infrastructure-centric environments (for example, complex data centers and networks) may find Device42 a closer fit; organizations seeking cross-functional data context with app/portal capabilities may find Starhive more aligned with their needs.