Steadybit

Name: Steadybit
Brand: SteadyIQ
Rating: 4.8 (8 reviews)

The reliability operations platform for chaos engineering, resilience training, and risk assessment.

Est 2019|Valuation $142.5M|Raised $13.8M|10 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 2K|Web traffic 2K|FTEs 16|HQ Solingen, North Rhine-Westphalia, DE

MarketsChaos Engineering

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Gremlin - Gremlin uses a sales-led pricing model; deployment sizing and pricing are typically discussed with customers. - Vendor-authored comparisons from Steadybit present competitive positioning; treat such documents as vendor-provided materials. - Harness Chaos Engineering - Harness positions its chaos engineering capabilities around Litmus and the Harness platform; pricing and packaging are typically provided during vendor engagement, with a free tier referenced in public materials. - AWS Fault Injection Service (AWS FIS) - AWS FIS provides native AWS fault-injection capabilities; for AWS-centric environments it can be an attractive option where native service integration and governance are priorities, though it does not natively address multi-cloud or on-premises failure injection without additional tooling. - Market share and adoption trends - Independently verifiable market share data for chaos engineering platforms is limited. Signals available in this research include presence on review platforms, mentions in developer forums, and earlier media coverage.

	Steadybit	Gremlin	Harness Chaos Engineering
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (Professional/Enterprise require sales contact; vendor-provided trial available)	Not publicly listed (custom quote via sales engagement)	Not publicly listed (a free tier is referenced in public materials; paid tiers require sales engagement)
Best For	Teams seeking a packaged chaos platform with integrated discovery and an experiment editor; vendor materials emphasize licensing that reduces per-user/agent billing friction	Organizations seeking a mature commercial chaos suite with established enterprise packaging	Organizations already using Harness or seeking Litmus-based chaos tooling integrated with other Harness capabilities
Key Strength	Vendor materials emphasize inclusive licensing and available on-prem deployment options; reviewer comments frequently note positive support interactions and straightforward initial workflows	Established brand recognition in chaos engineering; enterprise sales motion and packaging	Alignment with Kubernetes and the Litmus ecosystem; stated integration with existing Harness modules and pipeline tooling
Key Weakness	Limited public pricing transparency; limited public review footprint and some reports of documentation gaps and learning curve for advanced scenarios	Public pricing details are limited; pricing and packaging are handled via sales conversations	Pricing can depend on infrastructure targets and execution patterns; procurement may require detailed sizing discussions

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Gremlin
- Gremlin uses a sales-led pricing model; deployment sizing and pricing are typically discussed with customers.
- Vendor-authored comparisons from Steadybit present competitive positioning; treat such documents as vendor-provided materials.
Harness Chaos Engineering
- Harness positions its chaos engineering capabilities around Litmus and the Harness platform; pricing and packaging are typically provided during vendor engagement, with a free tier referenced in public materials.
AWS Fault Injection Service (AWS FIS)
- AWS FIS provides native AWS fault-injection capabilities; for AWS-centric environments it can be an attractive option where native service integration and governance are priorities, though it does not natively address multi-cloud or on-premises failure injection without additional tooling.
Market share and adoption trends
- Independently verifiable market share data for chaos engineering platforms is limited. Signals available in this research include presence on review platforms, mentions in developer forums, and earlier media coverage.

	Steadybit	Gremlin	Harness Chaos Engineering
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (Professional/Enterprise require sales contact; vendor-provided trial available)	Not publicly listed (custom quote via sales engagement)	Not publicly listed (a free tier is referenced in public materials; paid tiers require sales engagement)
Best For	Teams seeking a packaged chaos platform with integrated discovery and an experiment editor; vendor materials emphasize licensing that reduces per-user/agent billing friction	Organizations seeking a mature commercial chaos suite with established enterprise packaging	Organizations already using Harness or seeking Litmus-based chaos tooling integrated with other Harness capabilities
Key Strength	Vendor materials emphasize inclusive licensing and available on-prem deployment options; reviewer comments frequently note positive support interactions and straightforward initial workflows	Established brand recognition in chaos engineering; enterprise sales motion and packaging	Alignment with Kubernetes and the Litmus ecosystem; stated integration with existing Harness modules and pipeline tooling
Key Weakness	Limited public pricing transparency; limited public review footprint and some reports of documentation gaps and learning curve for advanced scenarios	Public pricing details are limited; pricing and packaging are handled via sales conversations	Pricing can depend on infrastructure targets and execution patterns; procurement may require detailed sizing discussions