Supermove

Name: Supermove
Brand: Supermove
Rating: 4.7 (22 reviews)

Supercharge your moving company

Est 2019|Valuation $98M|Raised $18M|24 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 8K|Website|Web traffic 5K|FTEs 46|HQ San Francisco, California, US

MarketsCRM

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Some competitors publish starting prices and include usage terms that reduce apparent procurement uncertainty compared with vendors that use quote-based pricing. Buyers should validate onboarding timelines and reference customers for claims about implementation speed and scope of features. - Competitor materials sometimes characterize Supermove’s flexibility as involving longer onboarding or partial functionality; these competitor perspectives can be biased and should be corroborated with independent references.

Adoption trends / market signal

Investor and vendor announcements include customer and usage metrics. These figures are vendor- or investor-provided and should be validated where they are consequential to a procurement decision.
Review volume on major review platforms in the reviewed dataset is modest, which may reflect a smaller installed base, recent product maturity changes, or limited review collection efforts.

	Supermove	Chariot	Movegistics
Starting Price	Not publicly listed; quote-based sales process	Public starting price available for entry tier (vendor-published)	Not publicly listed for full CRM; some modules and packages have published descriptions
Appropriate for	Movers seeking a single-platform approach with automation and machine-learning features (buyer should validate feature completeness and integration needs)	Movers seeking published, predictable entry pricing and claims of inclusive usage terms	Movers interested in AI-based survey tools and warehouse features; confirm total cost and module boundaries
Key Strength	Emphasis on automation and consolidation of sales/operations/accounting workflows; reviewer feedback often notes vendor responsiveness	Public pricing and stated inclusive usage can reduce procurement uncertainty	Emphasis on AI survey workflows and warehouse tooling; marketing highlights flexibility
Key Weakness	Reported issues with reporting accuracy, Apple/mobile limitations, pricing opacity, and potential module maturity concerns	Less evidence in this dataset about accounting depth relative to Supermove; validate with references	Pricing complexity and ambiguity for full CRM; confirm integration and costs

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Some competitors publish starting prices and include usage terms that reduce apparent procurement uncertainty compared with vendors that use quote-based pricing. Buyers should validate onboarding timelines and reference customers for claims about implementation speed and scope of features.
Competitor materials sometimes characterize Supermove’s flexibility as involving longer onboarding or partial functionality; these competitor perspectives can be biased and should be corroborated with independent references.

Adoption trends / market signal

Investor and vendor announcements include customer and usage metrics. These figures are vendor- or investor-provided and should be validated where they are consequential to a procurement decision.
Review volume on major review platforms in the reviewed dataset is modest, which may reflect a smaller installed base, recent product maturity changes, or limited review collection efforts.

	Supermove	Chariot	Movegistics
Starting Price	Not publicly listed; quote-based sales process	Public starting price available for entry tier (vendor-published)	Not publicly listed for full CRM; some modules and packages have published descriptions
Appropriate for	Movers seeking a single-platform approach with automation and machine-learning features (buyer should validate feature completeness and integration needs)	Movers seeking published, predictable entry pricing and claims of inclusive usage terms	Movers interested in AI-based survey tools and warehouse features; confirm total cost and module boundaries
Key Strength	Emphasis on automation and consolidation of sales/operations/accounting workflows; reviewer feedback often notes vendor responsiveness	Public pricing and stated inclusive usage can reduce procurement uncertainty	Emphasis on AI survey workflows and warehouse tooling; marketing highlights flexibility
Key Weakness	Reported issues with reporting accuracy, Apple/mobile limitations, pricing opacity, and potential module maturity concerns	Less evidence in this dataset about accounting depth relative to Supermove; validate with references	Pricing complexity and ambiguity for full CRM; confirm integration and costs