Supernormal

Name: Supernormal
Brand: Supernormal
Rating: 4.4 (20 reviews)

AI Native

Supernormal AI automatically transcribes and writes your meeting notes for Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams.

Est 2020|Valuation $35M|Raised $12M|20 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 9K|Web traffic 80K|FTEs 36|HQ New York, New York, US

MarketsConversation Intelligence Personal Productivity

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Supernormal vs Fireflies.ai: Business-tier pricing is broadly similar on an annual basis. Fireflies publishes detailed pricing and supports a broad language set; Supernormal positions on structured notes and workflow automations, but reviews suggest some accuracy and integration issues. - Supernormal vs Fathom: Fathom’s free tier is attractive for individuals and solo users. Supernormal’s structured note templates and CRM workflows may be advantageous for teams depending on integration depth. - Supernormal vs Otter.ai: Otter is a recognized brand with a different pricing model (minute-limited tiers). Supernormal’s per-seat approach can simplify billing but may cost more for light users.

Adoption trends

The AI meeting assistant category is crowded; press coverage has characterized many capabilities as similar across vendors and listed multiple alternatives.
Supernormal’s web claims of very large organization counts are not independently corroborated in this research.

	Supernormal	Fireflies.ai	Fathom
Starting Price	Free starter tier	Free starter tier	Free starter tier
Typical paid tier (monthly)	Pro: lower per-seat paid tier; Business: higher per-seat paid tier	Pro: lower per-seat paid tier; Business: higher per-seat paid tier	Premium/Team paid tiers at comparable per-seat levels
Common use case fit	Teams wanting structured notes and integrations into downstream tools (e.g., HubSpot)	Teams seeking broad meeting capture with conversation-intelligence features and API access	Individuals/teams prioritizing summaries, clips, and a substantive free tier
Key strength	Workflow-oriented notes, templates, integrations; the vendor references SOC 2 and HIPAA compliance	Feature breadth, multiple language support, conversation-intelligence capabilities	Generous free offering, clips/playlists, simple UX
Key weakness	Reported accuracy/integration volatility; public enterprise controls documentation less explicit	Some features gated by add-ons; privacy considerations in the category may affect perception	Enterprise governance and deeper conversation-intelligence features may be less mature

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Supernormal vs Fireflies.ai: Business-tier pricing is broadly similar on an annual basis. Fireflies publishes detailed pricing and supports a broad language set; Supernormal positions on structured notes and workflow automations, but reviews suggest some accuracy and integration issues.
Supernormal vs Fathom: Fathom’s free tier is attractive for individuals and solo users. Supernormal’s structured note templates and CRM workflows may be advantageous for teams depending on integration depth.
Supernormal vs Otter.ai: Otter is a recognized brand with a different pricing model (minute-limited tiers). Supernormal’s per-seat approach can simplify billing but may cost more for light users.

Adoption trends

The AI meeting assistant category is crowded; press coverage has characterized many capabilities as similar across vendors and listed multiple alternatives.
Supernormal’s web claims of very large organization counts are not independently corroborated in this research.

	Supernormal	Fireflies.ai	Fathom
Starting Price	Free starter tier	Free starter tier	Free starter tier
Typical paid tier (monthly)	Pro: lower per-seat paid tier; Business: higher per-seat paid tier	Pro: lower per-seat paid tier; Business: higher per-seat paid tier	Premium/Team paid tiers at comparable per-seat levels
Common use case fit	Teams wanting structured notes and integrations into downstream tools (e.g., HubSpot)	Teams seeking broad meeting capture with conversation-intelligence features and API access	Individuals/teams prioritizing summaries, clips, and a substantive free tier
Key strength	Workflow-oriented notes, templates, integrations; the vendor references SOC 2 and HIPAA compliance	Feature breadth, multiple language support, conversation-intelligence capabilities	Generous free offering, clips/playlists, simple UX
Key weakness	Reported accuracy/integration volatility; public enterprise controls documentation less explicit	Some features gated by add-ons; privacy considerations in the category may affect perception	Enterprise governance and deeper conversation-intelligence features may be less mature