Tap
AI NativeAI Media Buyer
Est 2021
Published Jul 15, 2026
No independent market share data for Tap were identified in the public sources reviewed. Press coverage provides scale-related claims (platforms/cities), but not market share measurements.
| Starting Price | Not publicly posted; vendor advertises a trial period | Pricing varies by offering; vendor materials reference campaign minimums in some products | Pricing is not published as a simple list; vendor documentation references a dynamic CPM model |
| Best For | Advertisers/agencies seeking faster planning and buying workflows that include TV/local inventory and API-driven integrations | Brands focused on convergent TV (linear + streaming) measurement and optimization | Marketers focused on performance-oriented CTV buying with dynamic CPM models |
| Key Strength | Vendor materials emphasize AI-assisted planning, consolidated reporting, and direct workflows with media owners; developer APIs are documented | Vendor materials emphasize measurement and incrementality testing (vendor-authored content) | Vendor materials position MNTN on performance CTV and automated buying models |
| Key Weakness | Limited public third-party reviews and limited public documentation of security posture and buyer-side pricing transparency | Some competitor content is marketing-oriented and may understate costs or nuances | May be more narrowly focused on CTV relative to multi-channel or traditional TV workflows |
Tap vs Tatari:
Tap vs DSPs like StackAdapt:
Tap vs AdRoll: