TeamViewer Asset Management

Name: TeamViewer Asset Management
Brand: TeamViewer
Rating: 4.5 (14505 reviews)

Leader

Creating a world that works better

Est 2005|Valuation $1.3B|Raised $913.2M

LinkedIn 202K|Website|Web traffic 9.4M|FTEs 1,900|HQ Goppingen, Germany

MarketsIT Asset Management (ITAM)

01Competitive Landscape

Top competitor comparison (3-way table)

(Prices below reflect what is publicly discoverable on vendor pages; many tools are quote-based. "Starting price" should be treated as indicative.) | Aspect | TeamViewer Asset Management | Lansweeper (standalone) | ManageEngine AssetExplorer | |--------|----------------------------|--------------------------|----------------------------| | Starting Price | Often sold as an add-on / quote-based (public pages emphasize features; trial available) | Pricing page is present but often quote-driven for core platform; some modules show published per-asset pricing | Pricing page exists and is more explicit by edition/asset counts (varies by cloud/on-prem) | | Most Suitable For | Existing TeamViewer customers seeking integrated inventory and RMM adjacencies | Deep discovery and inventory with extensive scanning and reporting; often used as a discovery source of truth | Organizations requiring classic ITAM features (contracts, lifecycle, compliance) in a cost-conscious suite | | Key Strength | Integration with TeamViewer remote operations and unified agent/portal approach for remote workstreams | Discovery and scanning depth with broad ecosystem integrations | Traditional ITAM breadth and relatively explicit edition/asset pricing | | Key Weakness | Community-reported billing and renewal issues; reliance on Lansweeper components for discovery depth; may not provide full lifecycle ITAM capabilities out of the box | Licensing changes and pricing have prompted community backlash; may require additional process work to realize value | Administrative overhead and potential complexity depending on edition and deployment model |

Narrative analysis

Where TeamViewer Asset Management appears to perform well: - For organizations that already use TeamViewer Remote, adding the Asset Management capability can be operationally attractive due to shared agents and a common portal. - The solution is positioned to provide automated discovery and integrated visibility into warranty and software details. Where alternatives can be stronger: - Organizations seeking best-in-class discovery depth and reporting often use Lansweeper directly and may consider TeamViewer’s offering primarily as an integration of Lansweeper capabilities. - For lifecycle ITAM requirements (purchase orders, contract management, depreciation, compliance workflows), dedicated ITAM suites (including ManageEngine AssetExplorer and ServiceNow ITAM) are more purpose-built. - MSP or RMM-first buyers may prefer MSP-aligned RMM platforms such as NinjaOne, which are commonly compared in community discussions. Competitor perspectives: - Lansweeper positions its platform and pricing model with emphasis on discovery and inventory. - NinjaOne and other RMM vendors present competitive positioning focused on MSP workflows and operational stability.

01Competitive Landscape

Top competitor comparison (3-way table)

(Prices below reflect what is publicly discoverable on vendor pages; many tools are quote-based. "Starting price" should be treated as indicative.)

Aspect	TeamViewer Asset Management	Lansweeper (standalone)	ManageEngine AssetExplorer
Starting Price	Often sold as an add-on / quote-based (public pages emphasize features; trial available)	Pricing page is present but often quote-driven for core platform; some modules show published per-asset pricing	Pricing page exists and is more explicit by edition/asset counts (varies by cloud/on-prem)
Most Suitable For	Existing TeamViewer customers seeking integrated inventory and RMM adjacencies	Deep discovery and inventory with extensive scanning and reporting; often used as a discovery source of truth	Organizations requiring classic ITAM features (contracts, lifecycle, compliance) in a cost-conscious suite
Key Strength	Integration with TeamViewer remote operations and unified agent/portal approach for remote workstreams	Discovery and scanning depth with broad ecosystem integrations	Traditional ITAM breadth and relatively explicit edition/asset pricing
Key Weakness	Community-reported billing and renewal issues; reliance on Lansweeper components for discovery depth; may not provide full lifecycle ITAM capabilities out of the box	Licensing changes and pricing have prompted community backlash; may require additional process work to realize value	Administrative overhead and potential complexity depending on edition and deployment model

Narrative analysis

Where TeamViewer Asset Management appears to perform well:

For organizations that already use TeamViewer Remote, adding the Asset Management capability can be operationally attractive due to shared agents and a common portal.
The solution is positioned to provide automated discovery and integrated visibility into warranty and software details.

Where alternatives can be stronger:

Organizations seeking best-in-class discovery depth and reporting often use Lansweeper directly and may consider TeamViewer’s offering primarily as an integration of Lansweeper capabilities.
For lifecycle ITAM requirements (purchase orders, contract management, depreciation, compliance workflows), dedicated ITAM suites (including ManageEngine AssetExplorer and ServiceNow ITAM) are more purpose-built.
MSP or RMM-first buyers may prefer MSP-aligned RMM platforms such as NinjaOne, which are commonly compared in community discussions.

Competitor perspectives:

Lansweeper positions its platform and pricing model with emphasis on discovery and inventory.
NinjaOne and other RMM vendors present competitive positioning focused on MSP workflows and operational stability.