TeamViewer Endpoint Protection

Name: TeamViewer Endpoint Protection
Brand: TeamViewer
Rating: 4.6 (15262 reviews)

Leader

Creating a world that works better

Est 2005|Valuation $1.2B|Raised $913.2M

LinkedIn 202K|Website|Web traffic 9.4M|FTEs 1,900|HQ Goppingen, Germany

MarketsEndpoint Security (EPP/EDR)

TeamViewer Endpoint Protection screenshot

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Differentiator: The primary operational differentiator for the TeamViewer offering is consolidation of remote access and endpoint protection actions in one management environment. This is an operational workflow advantage rather than an assertion of superior detection efficacy. - Alternatives: Security-native vendors (e.g., Microsoft, SentinelOne, CrowdStrike) typically emphasize detection engineering, SOC integration, and breadth of telemetry and third-party ecosystem integrations. - Pricing: TeamViewer uses an add-on model for endpoint protection and often requires sales engagement for final pricing. Other vendors publish package-level pricing or bundle pricing in enterprise licensing agreements; however, enterprise purchasing usually involves negotiation. (Official vendor documentation and product pages)

	TeamViewer Endpoint Protection (ThreatDown-powered)	Microsoft Defender for Endpoint	SentinelOne Singularity
Starting Price	Typically quote-based; Endpoint Protection is listed as an add-on to TeamViewer subscriptions rather than as a standalone public per-endpoint price.	Often bundled within Microsoft licensing tiers (for example, higher-tier Microsoft 365 offerings) and may be included in enterprise licensing agreements.	Public package information exists, but enterprise purchases are commonly negotiated with partners. (Official vendor product pages)
Primary fit	Organizations using TeamViewer Remote/RMM that prioritize operational consolidation and remote remediation workflows.	Organizations with Microsoft-centric infrastructure seeking deep identity and platform integration.	Organizations requiring a security-focused EDR platform with SOC-focused tooling and integrations.
Key strength	Integrated remote access and endpoint response controls inside the TeamViewer console, which can simplify certain operational tasks.	Deep integration with Windows/Entra/M365 ecosystems and identity telemetry.	Security-first EDR feature set and strong presence in SOC toolchains.
Key weakness	Dual-vendor model and potential support handoff ambiguity; community-reported performance and activation friction.	Licensing complexity and potential need for higher-tier licenses for full feature sets.	Pricing and packaging complexity at enterprise scale; requires integration work for broader ecosystems.

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Differentiator: The primary operational differentiator for the TeamViewer offering is consolidation of remote access and endpoint protection actions in one management environment. This is an operational workflow advantage rather than an assertion of superior detection efficacy.
Alternatives: Security-native vendors (e.g., Microsoft, SentinelOne, CrowdStrike) typically emphasize detection engineering, SOC integration, and breadth of telemetry and third-party ecosystem integrations.
Pricing: TeamViewer uses an add-on model for endpoint protection and often requires sales engagement for final pricing. Other vendors publish package-level pricing or bundle pricing in enterprise licensing agreements; however, enterprise purchasing usually involves negotiation. (Official vendor documentation and product pages)

	TeamViewer Endpoint Protection (ThreatDown-powered)	Microsoft Defender for Endpoint	SentinelOne Singularity
Starting Price	Typically quote-based; Endpoint Protection is listed as an add-on to TeamViewer subscriptions rather than as a standalone public per-endpoint price.	Often bundled within Microsoft licensing tiers (for example, higher-tier Microsoft 365 offerings) and may be included in enterprise licensing agreements.	Public package information exists, but enterprise purchases are commonly negotiated with partners. (Official vendor product pages)
Primary fit	Organizations using TeamViewer Remote/RMM that prioritize operational consolidation and remote remediation workflows.	Organizations with Microsoft-centric infrastructure seeking deep identity and platform integration.	Organizations requiring a security-focused EDR platform with SOC-focused tooling and integrations.
Key strength	Integrated remote access and endpoint response controls inside the TeamViewer console, which can simplify certain operational tasks.	Deep integration with Windows/Entra/M365 ecosystems and identity telemetry.	Security-first EDR feature set and strong presence in SOC toolchains.
Key weakness	Dual-vendor model and potential support handoff ambiguity; community-reported performance and activation friction.	Licensing complexity and potential need for higher-tier licenses for full feature sets.	Pricing and packaging complexity at enterprise scale; requires integration work for broader ecosystems.