ThreatBook (微步在线)

Name: ThreatBook (微步在线)
Brand: ThreatBook (微步在线)
Rating: 5 (292 reviews)

The Agentic Security Company. AI for Security, and Security for AI.

Est 2015|12 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 2K|Web traffic 220K|FTEs 110|HQ Downtown Core, Central Region, Singapore, SG

MarketsThreat Intelligence Platforms Endpoint Security (EPP/EDR)

01Competitive Landscape

Competitive Landscape

| Aspect | ThreatBook (TIP/TDP/OneSEC) | Recorded Future | VirusTotal | |--------|-----------------------------|-----------------|------------| | Starting Price | Pricing is quote-based; contact vendor for details | Published packages; contact vendor for pricing | Free community tier; enterprise pricing available from the vendor | | Best For | Organizations with a China footprint seeking integrated TI-driven detection across network/endpoint and API enrichment | Mature global CTI programs needing modular intelligence capabilities | Malware/URL/IP/domain triage, enrichment, and multi-engine scanning workflows | | Key Strength | Integrated intelligence and detection capabilities across multiple layers; local-language threat content and research | Breadth of intelligence modules and packaging; established presence in the global CTI market | Strong multi-engine scanning and widely used enrichment workflows | | Key Weakness | Limited transparent public pricing; limited volume of Western-language public reviews; public compliance attestations not clearly documented | Often perceived as premium-priced and requires configuration to realize full value | Enterprise pricing and sample handling considerations may require review |

Narrative analysis

- Where this vendor appears relatively strong - An integrated product set spanning TI, NDR, endpoint, and DNS-layer capabilities can reduce the number of separate tools required if an organization adopts multiple modules from the same provider. - The vendor maintains a content footprint focused on Chinese-language threat intelligence and China-related research. - Where competitors often excel - Some Western competitors have broader public analyst coverage, more extensive third-party benchmarking, and larger English-language review volumes. - Evidence gaps - Public, third-party, English-language evaluations and large-scale review volumes for this vendor are limited in the accessible sources, making independent validation important during procurement.

01Competitive Landscape

Competitive Landscape

Aspect	ThreatBook (TIP/TDP/OneSEC)	Recorded Future	VirusTotal
Starting Price	Pricing is quote-based; contact vendor for details	Published packages; contact vendor for pricing	Free community tier; enterprise pricing available from the vendor
Best For	Organizations with a China footprint seeking integrated TI-driven detection across network/endpoint and API enrichment	Mature global CTI programs needing modular intelligence capabilities	Malware/URL/IP/domain triage, enrichment, and multi-engine scanning workflows
Key Strength	Integrated intelligence and detection capabilities across multiple layers; local-language threat content and research	Breadth of intelligence modules and packaging; established presence in the global CTI market	Strong multi-engine scanning and widely used enrichment workflows
Key Weakness	Limited transparent public pricing; limited volume of Western-language public reviews; public compliance attestations not clearly documented	Often perceived as premium-priced and requires configuration to realize full value	Enterprise pricing and sample handling considerations may require review

Narrative analysis

Where this vendor appears relatively strong
- An integrated product set spanning TI, NDR, endpoint, and DNS-layer capabilities can reduce the number of separate tools required if an organization adopts multiple modules from the same provider.
- The vendor maintains a content footprint focused on Chinese-language threat intelligence and China-related research.
Where competitors often excel
- Some Western competitors have broader public analyst coverage, more extensive third-party benchmarking, and larger English-language review volumes.
Evidence gaps
- Public, third-party, English-language evaluations and large-scale review volumes for this vendor are limited in the accessible sources, making independent validation important during procurement.