Tines

Name: Tines
Brand: Tines
Rating: 4.8 (319 reviews)

Leader

The intelligent workflow platform. AI, automation and agents loved by security and IT teams.

Est 2018|Valuation $1.1B|Raised $271.7M|96 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 63K|Web traffic 93K|FTEs 400|HQ Dublin, Ireland

MarketsSecurity Information and Event Management (SIEM)Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR)IT Service Desk (ITSM)Business Process Management (BPM)Workflow Automation Agent Builder Platforms

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Where Tines appears to perform well: - **Vendor-agnostic integration style:** The product follows an API-first approach and supports HTTP requests and cURL-to-action patterns, which reviewers and product pages frequently note. - **Customer sentiment:** Review platforms show generally positive ratings for Tines. - **Security posture messaging:** SOC 2 Type II compliance and a Trust Center offering may satisfy many enterprise procurement baselines. Where competitors may be stronger: - **Case management/reporting/dashboard depth:** Competitors emphasize dashboards and case management as differentiators. - **Ecosystem consolidation:** SOAR platforms that are part of larger security ecosystems can be advantageous if an organization is already standardized on those vendors' stacks. Pricing comparison and value risk: - Paid pricing is not published for higher tiers, which increases procurement uncertainty. - Some competitors describe action-based pricing approaches; exact dollar amounts are typically available only via quote. - Broader ecosystem choices can be associated with different TCO profiles depending on ingest and scale. Adoption/market signals (caution): - Market research sources publish directional mindshare estimates; treat such metrics as indicative rather than definitive.

	Tines	Swimlane Turbine	Splunk SOAR
Starting Price	Community Edition: Free (paid pricing not public)	Pricing described as action-based tiers (details via datasheet/quote)	Pricing generally requires contacting sales; not publicly listed as a simple number
Best For	Security/IT teams wanting vendor-agnostic API automation and low-code workflows	Organizations emphasizing large-scale SOAR automation, dashboards/case management depth	Organizations standardized on the Splunk ecosystem or needing SOAR tightly tied to Splunk security data
Key Strength	Ease of building API-driven workflows; positive review sentiment; SOC 2 Type II compliance referenced; self-host option	Emphasizes scale, dashboards, and packaged case management capabilities	Mature SOAR heritage, broad playbook ecosystem, SIEM adjacency with Splunk
Key Weakness	Pricing opacity at paid tiers; governance/maintainability concerns at scale; some historical documentation/RBAC complaints	Implementation and resource requirements can be heavier for large deployments	Can be associated with higher TCO in some deployments; complexity when integrated into broader Splunk environments

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Where Tines appears to perform well:

Vendor-agnostic integration style: The product follows an API-first approach and supports HTTP requests and cURL-to-action patterns, which reviewers and product pages frequently note.
Customer sentiment: Review platforms show generally positive ratings for Tines.
Security posture messaging: SOC 2 Type II compliance and a Trust Center offering may satisfy many enterprise procurement baselines.

Where competitors may be stronger:

Case management/reporting/dashboard depth: Competitors emphasize dashboards and case management as differentiators.
Ecosystem consolidation: SOAR platforms that are part of larger security ecosystems can be advantageous if an organization is already standardized on those vendors' stacks.

Pricing comparison and value risk:

Paid pricing is not published for higher tiers, which increases procurement uncertainty.
Some competitors describe action-based pricing approaches; exact dollar amounts are typically available only via quote.
Broader ecosystem choices can be associated with different TCO profiles depending on ingest and scale.

Adoption/market signals (caution):

Market research sources publish directional mindshare estimates; treat such metrics as indicative rather than definitive.

	Tines	Swimlane Turbine	Splunk SOAR
Starting Price	Community Edition: Free (paid pricing not public)	Pricing described as action-based tiers (details via datasheet/quote)	Pricing generally requires contacting sales; not publicly listed as a simple number
Best For	Security/IT teams wanting vendor-agnostic API automation and low-code workflows	Organizations emphasizing large-scale SOAR automation, dashboards/case management depth	Organizations standardized on the Splunk ecosystem or needing SOAR tightly tied to Splunk security data
Key Strength	Ease of building API-driven workflows; positive review sentiment; SOC 2 Type II compliance referenced; self-host option	Emphasizes scale, dashboards, and packaged case management capabilities	Mature SOAR heritage, broad playbook ecosystem, SIEM adjacency with Splunk
Key Weakness	Pricing opacity at paid tiers; governance/maintainability concerns at scale; some historical documentation/RBAC complaints	Implementation and resource requirements can be heavier for large deployments	Can be associated with higher TCO in some deployments; complexity when integrated into broader Splunk environments