Trilio

Name: Trilio
Brand: Trilio

Trilio is a cloud-native data protection platform that provides backup/restore, disaster recovery, and workload/app mobility for Kubernetes, OpenStack, OpenShift and related environments.

Est 2013|Valuation $268M|Raised $39.8M|20 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 5K|Web traffic 7K|FTEs 33

MarketsBackup and Data Protection

01Competitive Landscape

| Aspect | Trilio | Veeam Kasten (Kasten K10) | CloudCasa | |--------|--------|---------------------------|----------| | Starting Price | Quote-based publicly; historical limited free tier and historical enterprise per-unit pricing | Typically quote-based/enterprise-oriented (public pricing often limited) | Public pricing page exists (plan-based) | | Best For | OpenStack-native backup + Kubernetes/OpenShift protection in enterprise/private cloud contexts | Kubernetes-first resilience with strong ecosystem visibility (Veeam brand + Kasten) | Kubernetes backup with more self-serve oriented packaging and published plans | | Key Strength | OpenStack specialization + Kubernetes security/DR messaging; strong support sentiment in small review sets | Strong Kubernetes data resilience product line + Veeam ecosystem integration | Pricing transparency and simpler buyer journey for some teams | | Key Weakness | Limited public pricing transparency; small review footprint; narrower scope than enterprise suites | Can be complex/enterprise-heavy; overall Veeam ecosystem can be costly (category perception) | May be less compelling for OpenStack-native needs; feature depth depends on tier | - Competitor notes and evidence - Kubernetes data protection vendor landscape commonly includes Trilio alongside Kasten, CloudCasa, and Portworx (industry publication coverage). - CloudCasa has a dedicated “Kubernetes Backup Pricing” page, indicating more explicit packaging than Trilio’s publicly accessible pages (vendor pricing documentation). - For OpenStack environments, community comments often imply fewer native alternatives beyond Trilio (and DIY), which can reduce competitive pressure but also indicates a niche market (community forums and discussions). - Feature comparison: where Trilio likely excels vs. lags - Likely excels - OpenStack-native data protection (a repeated positioning theme across analyst and partner content) - Hybrid-cloud / app mobility framing across platforms (vendor messaging) - Strong vendor support experience (based on analyst reviews) - Likely lags - Breadth of workload coverage compared to larger enterprise data platforms (e.g., Commvault/Veeam Data Platform) - Publicly visible “trust signals” (large review volumes, extensive independent benchmarks) - Pricing comparison: value proposition vs alternatives - Trilio: limited public pricing; appears enterprise sales-driven. - CloudCasa: transparent pricing page suggests easier up-front estimation for buyers (vendor pricing documentation). - Veeam ecosystem: pricing and packaging can be contentious in community discussions (industry and community commentary). - Customer testimonials comparing Trilio to competitors - Not found in accessible review sources (small dataset). - Market share and adoption trends - Not found as a reliable quantified datapoint in accessible sources.

01Competitive Landscape

Aspect	Trilio	Veeam Kasten (Kasten K10)	CloudCasa
Starting Price	Quote-based publicly; historical limited free tier and historical enterprise per-unit pricing	Typically quote-based/enterprise-oriented (public pricing often limited)	Public pricing page exists (plan-based)
Best For	OpenStack-native backup + Kubernetes/OpenShift protection in enterprise/private cloud contexts	Kubernetes-first resilience with strong ecosystem visibility (Veeam brand + Kasten)	Kubernetes backup with more self-serve oriented packaging and published plans
Key Strength	OpenStack specialization + Kubernetes security/DR messaging; strong support sentiment in small review sets	Strong Kubernetes data resilience product line + Veeam ecosystem integration	Pricing transparency and simpler buyer journey for some teams
Key Weakness	Limited public pricing transparency; small review footprint; narrower scope than enterprise suites	Can be complex/enterprise-heavy; overall Veeam ecosystem can be costly (category perception)	May be less compelling for OpenStack-native needs; feature depth depends on tier

Competitor notes and evidence
- Kubernetes data protection vendor landscape commonly includes Trilio alongside Kasten, CloudCasa, and Portworx (industry publication coverage).
- CloudCasa has a dedicated “Kubernetes Backup Pricing” page, indicating more explicit packaging than Trilio’s publicly accessible pages (vendor pricing documentation).
- For OpenStack environments, community comments often imply fewer native alternatives beyond Trilio (and DIY), which can reduce competitive pressure but also indicates a niche market (community forums and discussions).
Feature comparison: where Trilio likely excels vs. lags
- Likely excels
  - OpenStack-native data protection (a repeated positioning theme across analyst and partner content)
  - Hybrid-cloud / app mobility framing across platforms (vendor messaging)
  - Strong vendor support experience (based on analyst reviews)
- Likely lags
  - Breadth of workload coverage compared to larger enterprise data platforms (e.g., Commvault/Veeam Data Platform)
  - Publicly visible “trust signals” (large review volumes, extensive independent benchmarks)
Pricing comparison: value proposition vs alternatives
- Trilio: limited public pricing; appears enterprise sales-driven.
- CloudCasa: transparent pricing page suggests easier up-front estimation for buyers (vendor pricing documentation).
- Veeam ecosystem: pricing and packaging can be contentious in community discussions (industry and community commentary).
Customer testimonials comparing Trilio to competitors
- Not found in accessible review sources (small dataset).
Market share and adoption trends
- Not found as a reliable quantified datapoint in accessible sources.

Aspect

Trilio

Veeam Kasten (Kasten K10)

CloudCasa

Starting Price

Quote-based publicly; historical limited free tier and historical enterprise per-unit pricing

Typically quote-based/enterprise-oriented (public pricing often limited)

Public pricing page exists (plan-based)

Best For

OpenStack-native backup + Kubernetes/OpenShift protection in enterprise/private cloud contexts

Kubernetes-first resilience with strong ecosystem visibility (Veeam brand + Kasten)

Kubernetes backup with more self-serve oriented packaging and published plans

Key Strength

OpenStack specialization + Kubernetes security/DR messaging; strong support sentiment in small review sets

Strong Kubernetes data resilience product line + Veeam ecosystem integration

Pricing transparency and simpler buyer journey for some teams

Key Weakness

Limited public pricing transparency; small review footprint; narrower scope than enterprise suites

Can be complex/enterprise-heavy; overall Veeam ecosystem can be costly (category perception)

May be less compelling for OpenStack-native needs; feature depth depends on tier