Duplo

Name: Duplo
Brand: Jorim Agro Konsult

AI Native

Spend Management and Global Payments for Corporates

Est 2021|Valuation $34.5M|Raised $6.1M|8 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 12K|Website|Web traffic 6K|FTEs 79|HQ Lagos, Lagos State, NG

MarketsB2B Payments Cross-Border Payments

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Duplo aims to provide an integrated finance operations layer above payment processing, combining approvals, expense workflows, and reconciliation with collections/payouts. - Paystack and Flutterwave have more visible, mature ecosystems, broader merchant adoption, and clearer public documentation and pricing for payments. - Duplo may be preferable for teams that need an integrated finance-ops control layer with embedded payment capabilities, but buyers should validate reliability, depth of integrations, and corridor coverage for their use cases.

Pricing comparison (selected published points)

Duplo outflow (payout) pricing is presented as banded domestic transfer fees.
Market competitors show similar banded approaches for domestic transfers.

For domestic NGN transfers, unit pricing may be comparable across providers; differentiating factors are likely to be success rates, settlement speed, reconciliation tooling, support quality, and compliance onboarding friction.

Adoption trends

The company has accelerator participation and regional press coverage, which supports basic credibility. Public evidence of scale remains limited relative to category leaders.

	Duplo (tryduplo.com)	Paystack	Flutterwave
Starting Price	Collections: free-tier available with a collections fee; finance ops plans are demo-led.	No monthly fee; per-transaction pricing with a mix of percentage and fixed components.	No monthly fee; per-transaction pricing with a mix of percentage and fixed components.
Best For	Finance teams requiring approvals, spend controls, payables/collections, and reconciliation in a single product; also embedded APIs.	Merchants and platforms needing checkout, transfers, and virtual accounts; established developer ecosystem.	Multi-country collections and payouts; broader payment-method coverage for enterprise PSP features.
Key Strength	Workflow controls (multi-level approvals), reconciliation and reporting emphasis, combined dashboard and API approach.	Developer friendliness, mature ecosystem, transparent pricing and documentation.	Pan-African reach, breadth of payment rails, published pricing.
Key Weakness	Limited third-party reviews; less public detail on certain enterprise security artifacts. Core finance ops pricing is demo-led.	Primarily payments-centric; less built-in finance operations breadth unless integrated with other tools.	Market complexity and operational overhead in some countries; may be complex for smaller teams.

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Duplo aims to provide an integrated finance operations layer above payment processing, combining approvals, expense workflows, and reconciliation with collections/payouts.
Paystack and Flutterwave have more visible, mature ecosystems, broader merchant adoption, and clearer public documentation and pricing for payments.
Duplo may be preferable for teams that need an integrated finance-ops control layer with embedded payment capabilities, but buyers should validate reliability, depth of integrations, and corridor coverage for their use cases.

Pricing comparison (selected published points)

Duplo outflow (payout) pricing is presented as banded domestic transfer fees.
Market competitors show similar banded approaches for domestic transfers.

Adoption trends

The company has accelerator participation and regional press coverage, which supports basic credibility. Public evidence of scale remains limited relative to category leaders.

	Duplo (tryduplo.com)	Paystack	Flutterwave
Starting Price	Collections: free-tier available with a collections fee; finance ops plans are demo-led.	No monthly fee; per-transaction pricing with a mix of percentage and fixed components.	No monthly fee; per-transaction pricing with a mix of percentage and fixed components.
Best For	Finance teams requiring approvals, spend controls, payables/collections, and reconciliation in a single product; also embedded APIs.	Merchants and platforms needing checkout, transfers, and virtual accounts; established developer ecosystem.	Multi-country collections and payouts; broader payment-method coverage for enterprise PSP features.
Key Strength	Workflow controls (multi-level approvals), reconciliation and reporting emphasis, combined dashboard and API approach.	Developer friendliness, mature ecosystem, transparent pricing and documentation.	Pan-African reach, breadth of payment rails, published pricing.
Key Weakness	Limited third-party reviews; less public detail on certain enterprise security artifacts. Core finance ops pricing is demo-led.	Primarily payments-centric; less built-in finance operations breadth unless integrated with other tools.	Market complexity and operational overhead in some countries; may be complex for smaller teams.