POPin

Name: POPin
Brand: POPin

The honest conversation platform.

Est 2013|Valuation $31.2M|Raised $14.1M|4 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 940|Website|FTEs 6|HQ Denver, Colorado, US

MarketsEmployee Engagement & Survey Platforms Executive Town Halls & All-Hands Platforms

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- POPin versus survey suites: POPin emphasizes real-time, transparent dialogue and prioritization rather than delayed survey analysis. This can support faster alignment but requires active facilitation from leaders. - POPin versus Microsoft Viva: Microsoft offerings may be preferable where organizations already use the Microsoft ecosystem and seek integrated workflows; POPin may be selected when anonymity-first crowdsourcing and rapid prioritization are the primary requirements. - POPin versus Culture Amp / Qualtrics: Those platforms typically lead when buyers require deep benchmarking, program management, and mature analytics; POPin targets scenarios where facilitated, interactive sessions and prioritization are the primary jobs-to-be-done.

Market share / adoption trends

No independently verified market share data was found in the materials reviewed. Vendor-provided adoption claims should be validated during procurement.

	POPin	Microsoft Viva (Glint)	15Five (Engage)
Starting Price	Single-creator monthly plan in the low hundreds per month; enterprise starting in the low thousands per month; also an annual enterprise package in the low tens of thousands per year	Viva Suite licensing varies; Glint/Pulse typically priced on a per-user basis and may require Microsoft licensing prerequisites	Engage typically priced per user per month (annual billing common)
Best For	Real-time anonymous crowdsourcing and prioritization; facilitated discussion workflows	Organizations standardized on Microsoft 365 that want integrated employee feedback workflows	SMB to midmarket buyers seeking engagement surveys and action planning with predictable per-user pricing
Key Strength	Live, interactive feedback and voting workflows; configurable anonymity; automated summaries for open responses	Integration with Microsoft ecosystem at scale and procurement fit for enterprise customers	Simpler pricing and straightforward engagement survey workflows
Key Weakness	Limited independent review footprint and limited publicly available vendor security artifacts compared with larger vendors	Licensing complexity and potential dependency on Microsoft stack	Less oriented toward interactive crowdsourcing and real-time prioritization

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

POPin versus survey suites: POPin emphasizes real-time, transparent dialogue and prioritization rather than delayed survey analysis. This can support faster alignment but requires active facilitation from leaders.
POPin versus Microsoft Viva: Microsoft offerings may be preferable where organizations already use the Microsoft ecosystem and seek integrated workflows; POPin may be selected when anonymity-first crowdsourcing and rapid prioritization are the primary requirements.
POPin versus Culture Amp / Qualtrics: Those platforms typically lead when buyers require deep benchmarking, program management, and mature analytics; POPin targets scenarios where facilitated, interactive sessions and prioritization are the primary jobs-to-be-done.

Market share / adoption trends

No independently verified market share data was found in the materials reviewed. Vendor-provided adoption claims should be validated during procurement.

	POPin	Microsoft Viva (Glint)	15Five (Engage)
Starting Price	Single-creator monthly plan in the low hundreds per month; enterprise starting in the low thousands per month; also an annual enterprise package in the low tens of thousands per year	Viva Suite licensing varies; Glint/Pulse typically priced on a per-user basis and may require Microsoft licensing prerequisites	Engage typically priced per user per month (annual billing common)
Best For	Real-time anonymous crowdsourcing and prioritization; facilitated discussion workflows	Organizations standardized on Microsoft 365 that want integrated employee feedback workflows	SMB to midmarket buyers seeking engagement surveys and action planning with predictable per-user pricing
Key Strength	Live, interactive feedback and voting workflows; configurable anonymity; automated summaries for open responses	Integration with Microsoft ecosystem at scale and procurement fit for enterprise customers	Simpler pricing and straightforward engagement survey workflows
Key Weakness	Limited independent review footprint and limited publicly available vendor security artifacts compared with larger vendors	Licensing complexity and potential dependency on Microsoft stack	Less oriented toward interactive crowdsourcing and real-time prioritization