UiPath Process Mining

Name: UiPath Process Mining
Brand: UiPath
Rating: 4.5 (265 reviews)

Leader

Committed to shaping a world where AI enhances human potential & #agentic automation transforms how businesses operate.

Est 2005|Valuation $6B|Raised $2.3B

LinkedIn 551K|Website|Web traffic 1.2M|FTEs 3,981|HQ New York, New York, US

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

#### Celonis (specialist benchmark) - Often viewed as a category benchmark for large‑scale, ERP‑heavy process mining and execution management. - Third‑party comparisons indicate Celonis offers more advanced data manipulation and multi‑process exploration capabilities; UiPath may be more limited in some transformation techniques. Where Celonis can be stronger: - Deeper process analytics tooling, rich templates, breadth of connectors, and advanced pre‑built analysis patterns as commonly cited in market commentary. Where UiPath can be more appropriate: - When the objective includes both analysis and subsequent automation execution via UiPath RPA. #### Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining Microsoft positions process mining as part of Power Automate: - Vendor documentation describes a Premium plan that includes process mining entitlements at published per‑user pricing. - Microsoft also offers a process mining capacity add‑on with vendor communications noting add‑on options and pricing. Where Microsoft can be stronger: - Price transparency and low entry cost. - Integration for organizations already standardized on Dataverse/Power Platform. Risks/downsides: - At enterprise scale, Power Platform licensing (Dataverse, capacity) can become complex; community threads frequently debate licensing under different scenarios. #### IBM Process Mining IBM publishes an explicit starting price for SaaS and lists on‑prem options. Where IBM can be stronger: - Buyers wanting published reference pricing and alignment with IBM Cloud and integration portfolios. - IBM’s positioning includes features such as simulation/what‑if analysis. #### SAP Signavio Process Intelligence - SAP Signavio Process Intelligence is typically quote‑based. In SAP‑centric organizations, Signavio is often selected for broader transformation programs tied to SAP landscapes. #### Adoption / market trend signals - PeerSpot mindshare data suggests UiPath Process Mining has meaningful engagement but not dominant share relative to top players (directional only). - Independent survey excerpts suggest UiPath presence in process automation tooling increased year‑over‑year in some survey contexts; methodology and representativeness should be reviewed before relying on these data.

	UiPath Process Mining	Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining	IBM Process Mining
Starting Price	Sales‑led; vendor references include example per‑user and developer figures, but enterprise pricing varies	Vendor-published per‑user pricing for a Premium plan includes process mining entitlements; capacity add-ons are also offered	Vendor-published starting SaaS package pricing is available
Most Appropriate For	Existing UiPath customers wanting an integrated discovery→automation workflow	Microsoft‑centric orgs needing a low entry cost and Power Platform integration	Buyers wanting published entry pricing and IBM ecosystem alignment
Key Strength	Integration with RPA lifecycle (Automation Hub/Orchestrator) and UiPath ecosystem	Low barrier to entry; clear pricing; integration with Microsoft stack	Transparent published starting pricing; broad BPM/automation portfolio synergy
Key Weakness	Pricing opacity; integration/data prep complexity; may lag specialists in deep analytics	Licensing complexity at scale (Dataverse/capacity) and process mining depth may be less than specialists	Not always perceived as specialist for advanced execution management use cases

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

Celonis (specialist benchmark)

Often viewed as a category benchmark for large‑scale, ERP‑heavy process mining and execution management.
Third‑party comparisons indicate Celonis offers more advanced data manipulation and multi‑process exploration capabilities; UiPath may be more limited in some transformation techniques.

Where Celonis can be stronger:

Deeper process analytics tooling, rich templates, breadth of connectors, and advanced pre‑built analysis patterns as commonly cited in market commentary.

Where UiPath can be more appropriate:

When the objective includes both analysis and subsequent automation execution via UiPath RPA.

Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining

Microsoft positions process mining as part of Power Automate:

Vendor documentation describes a Premium plan that includes process mining entitlements at published per‑user pricing.
Microsoft also offers a process mining capacity add‑on with vendor communications noting add‑on options and pricing.

Where Microsoft can be stronger:

Price transparency and low entry cost.
Integration for organizations already standardized on Dataverse/Power Platform.

Risks/downsides:

At enterprise scale, Power Platform licensing (Dataverse, capacity) can become complex; community threads frequently debate licensing under different scenarios.

IBM Process Mining

IBM publishes an explicit starting price for SaaS and lists on‑prem options.

Where IBM can be stronger:

Buyers wanting published reference pricing and alignment with IBM Cloud and integration portfolios.
IBM’s positioning includes features such as simulation/what‑if analysis.

SAP Signavio Process Intelligence

SAP Signavio Process Intelligence is typically quote‑based. In SAP‑centric organizations, Signavio is often selected for broader transformation programs tied to SAP landscapes.

Adoption / market trend signals

PeerSpot mindshare data suggests UiPath Process Mining has meaningful engagement but not dominant share relative to top players (directional only).
Independent survey excerpts suggest UiPath presence in process automation tooling increased year‑over‑year in some survey contexts; methodology and representativeness should be reviewed before relying on these data.

	UiPath Process Mining	Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining	IBM Process Mining
Starting Price	Sales‑led; vendor references include example per‑user and developer figures, but enterprise pricing varies	Vendor-published per‑user pricing for a Premium plan includes process mining entitlements; capacity add-ons are also offered	Vendor-published starting SaaS package pricing is available
Most Appropriate For	Existing UiPath customers wanting an integrated discovery→automation workflow	Microsoft‑centric orgs needing a low entry cost and Power Platform integration	Buyers wanting published entry pricing and IBM ecosystem alignment
Key Strength	Integration with RPA lifecycle (Automation Hub/Orchestrator) and UiPath ecosystem	Low barrier to entry; clear pricing; integration with Microsoft stack	Transparent published starting pricing; broad BPM/automation portfolio synergy
Key Weakness	Pricing opacity; integration/data prep complexity; may lag specialists in deep analytics	Licensing complexity at scale (Dataverse/capacity) and process mining depth may be less than specialists	Not always perceived as specialist for advanced execution management use cases

UiPath Process Mining

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

02Market Map

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

Celonis (specialist benchmark)

Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining

IBM Process Mining

SAP Signavio Process Intelligence

Adoption / market trend signals

02Market Map

Celonis (specialist benchmark)

Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining

IBM Process Mining

SAP Signavio Process Intelligence

Adoption / market trend signals