Unixi

Name: Unixi
Brand: Unixi

AI Native

Universal SSO for Every SaaS App

Est 2023|Valuation $17M|Raised $6.5M|22 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 2K|Web traffic 2K|FTEs 26|HQ Wilmington, Delaware, US

MarketsIdentity Provider (IdP) & SSO Identity Provider (IdP) & Single Sign-On (SSO)

01Competitive Landscape

| Aspect | Unixi (vendor claims) | Okta (Workforce Identity/SSO) | Microsoft Entra ID | |--------|-----------------------|-------------------------------|--------------------| | Starting Price | Not publicly listed (demo / trial engagement indicated); vendor product pages and engagement channels | Public pricing available but product/region-dependent; vendor pricing pages | Public pricing pages with tiered plans; vendor pricing pages | | Typical Use Case | Organizations seeking browser-level controls to cover non-SAML/shadow SaaS logins and reduce reliance on reusable passwords without per-app SAML/OIDC connectors; vendor product overview and feature pages | Organizations needing a mature IdP with broad SAML/OIDC integrations and lifecycle/governance features; product datasheet and feature pages | Microsoft-centric environments seeking integrated IAM, MFA, and SSO governance within the Microsoft ecosystem; vendor product overview and feature pages | | Key Characteristics | Browser-extension based approach intended to extend IdP coverage to browser apps; vendor suggests reduced need to purchase higher SaaS plans for SAML features; product/technical documentation | Mature ecosystem, large application catalog, standards-based SSO, role provisioning and lifecycle features; product datasheet and enterprise resources | Deep integration with Microsoft 365/Azure services; can be economical within a Microsoft-licensed environment; vendor documentation | | Key Risks | Limited independent reviews, limited public security attestations, extension-related risk surface; pricing not transparent; vendor privacy policy and public docs | Cost at scale and dependency on app vendors supporting SAML/OIDC; some features require higher-tier licensing | Licensing complexity and advanced governance may require higher-tier licensing; not targeted at eliminating passwords for apps lacking native SSO | - Narrative analysis - Differentiation claimed by the vendor: - The vendor’s primary architectural differentiation is a browser-level SSO approach intended to extend IdP coverage to applications that do not support SAML/OIDC. Buyers should validate coverage and operational trade-offs for their specific application portfolio; product technical documentation and explainer pages. - Where incumbent competitors are stronger: - Okta and Microsoft Entra function as established identity systems of record with extensive integrations, enterprise referenceability, and documented compliance programs. Password manager vendors can manage non-SSO apps through vaulting and are evolving toward access governance, but these approaches rely on stored secrets or managed vault models.

01Competitive Landscape

Aspect	Unixi (vendor claims)	Okta (Workforce Identity/SSO)	Microsoft Entra ID
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (demo / trial engagement indicated); vendor product pages and engagement channels	Public pricing available but product/region-dependent; vendor pricing pages	Public pricing pages with tiered plans; vendor pricing pages
Typical Use Case	Organizations seeking browser-level controls to cover non-SAML/shadow SaaS logins and reduce reliance on reusable passwords without per-app SAML/OIDC connectors; vendor product overview and feature pages	Organizations needing a mature IdP with broad SAML/OIDC integrations and lifecycle/governance features; product datasheet and feature pages	Microsoft-centric environments seeking integrated IAM, MFA, and SSO governance within the Microsoft ecosystem; vendor product overview and feature pages
Key Characteristics	Browser-extension based approach intended to extend IdP coverage to browser apps; vendor suggests reduced need to purchase higher SaaS plans for SAML features; product/technical documentation	Mature ecosystem, large application catalog, standards-based SSO, role provisioning and lifecycle features; product datasheet and enterprise resources	Deep integration with Microsoft 365/Azure services; can be economical within a Microsoft-licensed environment; vendor documentation
Key Risks	Limited independent reviews, limited public security attestations, extension-related risk surface; pricing not transparent; vendor privacy policy and public docs	Cost at scale and dependency on app vendors supporting SAML/OIDC; some features require higher-tier licensing	Licensing complexity and advanced governance may require higher-tier licensing; not targeted at eliminating passwords for apps lacking native SSO

Narrative analysis
- Differentiation claimed by the vendor:
  - The vendor’s primary architectural differentiation is a browser-level SSO approach intended to extend IdP coverage to applications that do not support SAML/OIDC. Buyers should validate coverage and operational trade-offs for their specific application portfolio; product technical documentation and explainer pages.
- Where incumbent competitors are stronger:
  - Okta and Microsoft Entra function as established identity systems of record with extensive integrations, enterprise referenceability, and documented compliance programs. Password manager vendors can manage non-SSO apps through vaulting and are evolving toward access governance, but these approaches rely on stored secrets or managed vault models.

Aspect

Unixi (vendor claims)

Okta (Workforce Identity/SSO)

Microsoft Entra ID

Starting Price

Not publicly listed (demo / trial engagement indicated); vendor product pages and engagement channels

Public pricing available but product/region-dependent; vendor pricing pages

Public pricing pages with tiered plans; vendor pricing pages

Typical Use Case

Organizations seeking browser-level controls to cover non-SAML/shadow SaaS logins and reduce reliance on reusable passwords without per-app SAML/OIDC connectors; vendor product overview and feature pages

Organizations needing a mature IdP with broad SAML/OIDC integrations and lifecycle/governance features; product datasheet and feature pages

Microsoft-centric environments seeking integrated IAM, MFA, and SSO governance within the Microsoft ecosystem; vendor product overview and feature pages

Key Characteristics

Browser-extension based approach intended to extend IdP coverage to browser apps; vendor suggests reduced need to purchase higher SaaS plans for SAML features; product/technical documentation

Mature ecosystem, large application catalog, standards-based SSO, role provisioning and lifecycle features; product datasheet and enterprise resources

Deep integration with Microsoft 365/Azure services; can be economical within a Microsoft-licensed environment; vendor documentation

Key Risks

Limited independent reviews, limited public security attestations, extension-related risk surface; pricing not transparent; vendor privacy policy and public docs

Cost at scale and dependency on app vendors supporting SAML/OIDC; some features require higher-tier licensing

Licensing complexity and advanced governance may require higher-tier licensing; not targeted at eliminating passwords for apps lacking native SSO