Kojo

Name: Kojo
Brand: Kojo
Rating: 4.6 (5 reviews)

Kojo is the construction industry's leading materials procurement platform, powered by AI.

Est 2018|Valuation $289M|Raised $89M|67 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 13K|Web traffic 79K|FTEs 160|HQ San Francisco, California, US

MarketsIntake-to-Pay

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Areas where Kojo shows strengths - Focus on materials procurement and field-originated workflows: the product is designed to move requests originating in the field through procurement to invoice reconciliation and accounting integration. - Invoice matching as a practical control point: vendor materials highlight invoice matching and discrepancy detection as a mechanism to reduce invoice errors and related costs, which can be a measurable control for AP teams. - Integration-first posture: vendor and industry materials indicate emphasis on integrations with common construction systems of record (Viewpoint Vista/Spectrum, Sage, QuickBooks, Procore). Sources: - Vendor integration documentation and industry reporting Where alternatives may be stronger - Organizations seeking a single platform for full project execution (RFIs/submittals/drawings/quality/safety) may prefer broader suites such as Procore or Autodesk Build to reduce the number of vendors in their stack. - Organizations that require ERP-native procurement and deep financial/job cost controls may prefer to use Viewpoint or another ERP as the primary procurement system, integrating specialist tools only where necessary. Sources: - Competitor product pages and ERP vendor positioning Market share/adoption trends - Industry reporting and vendor materials indicate growth and expansion across trades, but the category remains fragmented and competitors have larger established installed bases in many segments. Source: - Industry reporting

	Kojo	Procore	Autodesk Construction Cloud (Autodesk Build / Docs)
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (quote-based)	Quote-based (custom quote)	Public pricing pages exist for some products; pricing varies by product and region
Typical fit	Trade contractors/self-perform contractors needing a dedicated materials procurement and P2P workflow with ERP integrations	Contractors needing a broad construction project management platform with a large ecosystem	Firms seeking unified document/model workflows and broader construction operations functionality within the Autodesk ecosystem
Key Strength	Materials procurement workflows designed for construction (field→office→supplier→accounting); invoice matching; supplier and ERP integrations	Broad platform scope (execution, cost/resource management), ecosystem integrations	Document/model coordination, design-to-construction workflows, and broader Autodesk integrations
Key Weakness	Limited public pricing transparency; limited public review volume; potential change management and integration governance requirements	Can be costly to implement at scale; suite breadth may exceed needs for procurement-only use cases	Complex configuration across multiple modules; pricing and module composition can be difficult to compare

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Areas where Kojo shows strengths

Focus on materials procurement and field-originated workflows: the product is designed to move requests originating in the field through procurement to invoice reconciliation and accounting integration.
Invoice matching as a practical control point: vendor materials highlight invoice matching and discrepancy detection as a mechanism to reduce invoice errors and related costs, which can be a measurable control for AP teams.
Integration-first posture: vendor and industry materials indicate emphasis on integrations with common construction systems of record (Viewpoint Vista/Spectrum, Sage, QuickBooks, Procore).

Sources:

Vendor integration documentation and industry reporting

Where alternatives may be stronger

Organizations seeking a single platform for full project execution (RFIs/submittals/drawings/quality/safety) may prefer broader suites such as Procore or Autodesk Build to reduce the number of vendors in their stack.
Organizations that require ERP-native procurement and deep financial/job cost controls may prefer to use Viewpoint or another ERP as the primary procurement system, integrating specialist tools only where necessary.

Sources:

Competitor product pages and ERP vendor positioning

Market share/adoption trends

Industry reporting and vendor materials indicate growth and expansion across trades, but the category remains fragmented and competitors have larger established installed bases in many segments.

Source:

Industry reporting

	Kojo	Procore	Autodesk Construction Cloud (Autodesk Build / Docs)
Starting Price	Not publicly listed (quote-based)	Quote-based (custom quote)	Public pricing pages exist for some products; pricing varies by product and region
Typical fit	Trade contractors/self-perform contractors needing a dedicated materials procurement and P2P workflow with ERP integrations	Contractors needing a broad construction project management platform with a large ecosystem	Firms seeking unified document/model workflows and broader construction operations functionality within the Autodesk ecosystem
Key Strength	Materials procurement workflows designed for construction (field→office→supplier→accounting); invoice matching; supplier and ERP integrations	Broad platform scope (execution, cost/resource management), ecosystem integrations	Document/model coordination, design-to-construction workflows, and broader Autodesk integrations
Key Weakness	Limited public pricing transparency; limited public review volume; potential change management and integration governance requirements	Can be costly to implement at scale; suite breadth may exceed needs for procurement-only use cases	Complex configuration across multiple modules; pricing and module composition can be difficult to compare