UserTesting Amplify

Name: UserTesting Amplify
Brand: UserTesting

Leader

Get user insights into your digital tomorrow, today.

Est 2015|Valuation $1.1B|Raised $50M

LinkedIn 952|Website|Web traffic 1.1M|FTEs 800|HQ Bellevue, Washington, US

MarketsUser Research

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Where UserTesting Amplify tends to perform well: - Organizations that need to distribute research outputs beyond research teams: clip creation and integrations (Figma/Jira/Miro; Teams/Slack) are intended to embed findings into delivery workflows. - Enterprises that require documented security certifications: the Trust Center lists common industry security certifications. Where competitors commonly have advantages: - Dovetail is frequently cited as stronger for tagging, synthesis, and repository workflows, especially when interviews are recorded elsewhere and an independent repository is required. - Maze is often considered more lightweight and faster for unmoderated prototype testing setup in comparison to full-panel testing solutions. - Sprig can be preferable for continuous, in-product feedback and behavioral measurement when the goal is ongoing data collection rather than panel-based qualitative sessions. Adoption and market signals: - UserTesting positions itself for enterprise customers and public materials reference a broad customer base and penetration in large enterprises; these are vendor-provided claims that should be validated in procurement.

	UserTesting Amplify (UserTesting)	Dovetail	Sprig
Starting Price	Quote-based (sales-led; plan types: consumption vs team unlimited)	Free plan available; paid tiers; enterprise options are custom	Free plan available; enterprise bundles are demo/sales-led
Typical Use Case	Enterprise teams focused on video-based qualitative research plus stakeholder sharing and governance	Centralized repository and synthesis across many data sources; strong tagging and search	In-product feedback, surveys, and continuous experience measurement; product-focused analytics
Key Strengths	Large participant network and multiple testing modes; enterprise controls and sharing capabilities	Repository-first synthesis, tagging, and search capabilities that support knowledge management	Capturing feedback in-product and ongoing measurement tied to usage contexts
Key Weaknesses	Pricing opacity; participant quality concerns in some markets; lack of SCIM provisioning in self-service; reported navigation/folder management friction	Often paired with separate recruiting/execution tools; not a full testing-execution replacement in many workflows	Less emphasis on deep qualitative moderated interviews and long-form video capture compared with panel-based testing tools

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Where UserTesting Amplify tends to perform well:

Organizations that need to distribute research outputs beyond research teams: clip creation and integrations (Figma/Jira/Miro; Teams/Slack) are intended to embed findings into delivery workflows.
Enterprises that require documented security certifications: the Trust Center lists common industry security certifications.

Where competitors commonly have advantages:

Dovetail is frequently cited as stronger for tagging, synthesis, and repository workflows, especially when interviews are recorded elsewhere and an independent repository is required.
Maze is often considered more lightweight and faster for unmoderated prototype testing setup in comparison to full-panel testing solutions.
Sprig can be preferable for continuous, in-product feedback and behavioral measurement when the goal is ongoing data collection rather than panel-based qualitative sessions.

Adoption and market signals:

UserTesting positions itself for enterprise customers and public materials reference a broad customer base and penetration in large enterprises; these are vendor-provided claims that should be validated in procurement.

	UserTesting Amplify (UserTesting)	Dovetail	Sprig
Starting Price	Quote-based (sales-led; plan types: consumption vs team unlimited)	Free plan available; paid tiers; enterprise options are custom	Free plan available; enterprise bundles are demo/sales-led
Typical Use Case	Enterprise teams focused on video-based qualitative research plus stakeholder sharing and governance	Centralized repository and synthesis across many data sources; strong tagging and search	In-product feedback, surveys, and continuous experience measurement; product-focused analytics
Key Strengths	Large participant network and multiple testing modes; enterprise controls and sharing capabilities	Repository-first synthesis, tagging, and search capabilities that support knowledge management	Capturing feedback in-product and ongoing measurement tied to usage contexts
Key Weaknesses	Pricing opacity; participant quality concerns in some markets; lack of SCIM provisioning in self-service; reported navigation/folder management friction	Often paired with separate recruiting/execution tools; not a full testing-execution replacement in many workflows	Less emphasis on deep qualitative moderated interviews and long-form video capture compared with panel-based testing tools