Veras
AI NativeTransforming the Post-Acute Space
Est 2021|Valuation $13M|Raised $3.8M
Published Sep 19, 2026
No public roadmap or dated feature announcements were found beyond the 2024 Jobwise-to-Veras rebrand announcement.
No published constraints were found (for example, maximum employees, maximum facilities, or performance SLAs).
Public, independently verifiable evidence of differentiated outcomes (for example, a percentage reduction in overtime) was not found for Veras during this research. Claims should be validated through:
In LTC, buyers often select modern scheduling platforms when they need:
Veras presents features intended to address several of these needs; vendor statements should be validated during diligence.
Common churn drivers in WFM that should be validated in Veras references:
No public Veras customer case studies with metrics were found on the vendor's public website during this research.
Veras states its platform helps operators:
Methodology gap: No public ROI methodology, baseline definitions, measurement periods, or independently verified customer results were found.
To address limited public case studies, purchasers should request:
Given Veras’s demo-led approach and LTC specificity, a realistic ICP is:
Get a comprehensive analysis of Veras including market position, competitive landscape, adoption trends, and peer benchmarks.
Download full report →Procurement requires publicly documented enterprise security posture on day one
Extensive prebuilt integrations are required
Decision-making relies on abundant third-party reviews and case studies
Contact-center WFM requirements are primary
Transparent self-serve pricing is a strict requirement
Note on review availability: The lack of third-party reviews can indicate a product is early-stage, sells through direct channels without a review-driven GTM motion, or is listed under a prior name (Jobwise). It could also indicate limited market traction; this should be validated in reference calls.
The iOS Veras app listing indicates a mid-range user rating with a modest number of ratings in the U.S. App Store.
Interpretation caution: App Store ratings primarily reflect frontline user experience rather than enterprise administrative outcomes (ROI, compliance, integrations). They are a partial signal.
Direct end-user quotes specifically about Veras were not readily available in third-party review platforms. For category context, the following representative sentiments appear in workforce management discussions:
Veras is a workforce management and scheduling platform focused on long-term care (LTC) and senior housing operators. The product positioning emphasizes AI-based scheduling and predictive staffing combined with operational workflows (e.g., call-off management) and analytics intended to reduce labor-related expenses—especially overtime and agency reliance—and to help facilities meet labor targets such as per-patient-day (PPD) and per-resident-day (PRD).
Based on the vendor’s iOS app description, the platform also includes frontline workflows such as: viewing schedules, claiming open shifts, basic team visibility, secure messaging/chat, and credential/document handling.
Important ambiguity / naming risk: “Veras” is a shared name across multiple unrelated companies (e.g., Veras Retail, Verasity/VeraViews, etc.). This report is specifically about Veras as described on the vendor’s official site, which states it is formerly Jobwise and focused on long-term care workforce management.
Veras states labor is the largest variable expense in LTC and asserts it can reduce overtime and agency costs and support compliance reporting. Vendor statements are noted as claims and should be validated during diligence.