VIPRE Integrated Email Security

VIPRE Integrated Email Security is a cloud email security solution that augments existing secure email gateways and Microsoft 365 to reduce phishing, malicious URLs/attachments, spam/graymail, and email-borne malware while offering optional add-ons such as link isolation and sandboxing.

5 Ref Customers

Website

MarketsEmail Security

01Competitive Landscape

| Aspect | VIPRE Integrated Email Security | Proofpoint Essentials | Microsoft Defender for Office 365 | |--------|-------------------------------|----------------------|-----------------------------------| | Starting Price | Public pricing is fragmented; appears per-user/year and per-seat via marketplaces/resellers (example reseller listings in modest per-user/per-year ranges; vendor quotes are common) | Published per-user/month pricing varies by package (vendor-published MSRP available) | Often bundled into Microsoft licensing; public list pricing varies by plan/region; commonly purchased as P1/P2 add-on (exact current list price not captured in sources here) | | Recommended for | SMB/mid-market wanting an augmentation layer for email security, potentially complementing an existing SEG and Microsoft 365 | SMB/mid-market wanting an established SEG offering with clear tier packaging | Microsoft-centric organizations seeking integrated security tooling and consolidated licensing | | Key Strengths | Cost-competitive positioning; reviewer-reported simpler administration; SAML SSO support; positioned to augment existing SEG filtering | Clear per-tier feature definitions and a broad ecosystem; URL defense, sandboxing, encryption, and BEC defenses depending on package | Tight integration with Microsoft 365 security tooling and identity; operational simplicity for organizations standardized on Microsoft | | Key Weaknesses | Reported false positives and community-reported delivery incidents; less clearly published compliance and data residency details; potential feature gaps in advanced BEC/impersonation controls | Can become costly at higher tiers; some community commentary notes variability in post-acquisition support quality | Baseline Microsoft 365 filtering may require higher-tier licensing or add-ons for advanced capabilities | - Direct competitors and differentiators - Proofpoint - Proofpoint publishes MSRP price lists for Essentials, which provides procurement transparency. - Proofpoint marketing materials include block-rate claims; buyers should seek independent validation and clarify applicability to their environments. - Check Point (Avanan) - Community threads compare Avanan and Proofpoint on protection and pricing; these are largely anecdotal and should be validated in pilots. - Mimecast / Barracuda / Cisco - These vendors compete on enterprise features, ecosystem integrations, and legacy on-prem/hybrid options in some cases. - Pricing comparison (directional) - Proofpoint Essentials MSRP: Published per-user/month ranges that vary by package (see vendor materials). - VIPRE: per-user/per-year pricing is common in marketplace/reseller listings; direct vendor MSRP and packaging were less transparent in the sources accessed. - When customers choose competitors instead (and why) - Organizations with strict compliance procurement requirements may choose vendors with clearly published compliance documentation and enterprise attestations. - Buyers prioritizing advanced BEC/impersonation protection and automated remediation may prefer Proofpoint or Avanan approaches. - Microsoft-centric organizations may prefer Defender for Office 365 for licensing consolidation and platform integration.

01Competitive Landscape

Aspect	VIPRE Integrated Email Security	Proofpoint Essentials	Microsoft Defender for Office 365
Starting Price	Public pricing is fragmented; appears per-user/year and per-seat via marketplaces/resellers (example reseller listings in modest per-user/per-year ranges; vendor quotes are common)	Published per-user/month pricing varies by package (vendor-published MSRP available)	Often bundled into Microsoft licensing; public list pricing varies by plan/region; commonly purchased as P1/P2 add-on (exact current list price not captured in sources here)
Recommended for	SMB/mid-market wanting an augmentation layer for email security, potentially complementing an existing SEG and Microsoft 365	SMB/mid-market wanting an established SEG offering with clear tier packaging	Microsoft-centric organizations seeking integrated security tooling and consolidated licensing
Key Strengths	Cost-competitive positioning; reviewer-reported simpler administration; SAML SSO support; positioned to augment existing SEG filtering	Clear per-tier feature definitions and a broad ecosystem; URL defense, sandboxing, encryption, and BEC defenses depending on package	Tight integration with Microsoft 365 security tooling and identity; operational simplicity for organizations standardized on Microsoft
Key Weaknesses	Reported false positives and community-reported delivery incidents; less clearly published compliance and data residency details; potential feature gaps in advanced BEC/impersonation controls	Can become costly at higher tiers; some community commentary notes variability in post-acquisition support quality	Baseline Microsoft 365 filtering may require higher-tier licensing or add-ons for advanced capabilities

Direct competitors and differentiators
- Proofpoint
  - Proofpoint publishes MSRP price lists for Essentials, which provides procurement transparency.
  - Proofpoint marketing materials include block-rate claims; buyers should seek independent validation and clarify applicability to their environments.
- Check Point (Avanan)
  - Community threads compare Avanan and Proofpoint on protection and pricing; these are largely anecdotal and should be validated in pilots.
- Mimecast / Barracuda / Cisco
  - These vendors compete on enterprise features, ecosystem integrations, and legacy on-prem/hybrid options in some cases.
Pricing comparison (directional)
- Proofpoint Essentials MSRP: Published per-user/month ranges that vary by package (see vendor materials).
- VIPRE: per-user/per-year pricing is common in marketplace/reseller listings; direct vendor MSRP and packaging were less transparent in the sources accessed.
When customers choose competitors instead (and why)
- Organizations with strict compliance procurement requirements may choose vendors with clearly published compliance documentation and enterprise attestations.
- Buyers prioritizing advanced BEC/impersonation protection and automated remediation may prefer Proofpoint or Avanan approaches.
- Microsoft-centric organizations may prefer Defender for Office 365 for licensing consolidation and platform integration.

Aspect

VIPRE Integrated Email Security

Proofpoint Essentials

Microsoft Defender for Office 365

Starting Price

Public pricing is fragmented; appears per-user/year and per-seat via marketplaces/resellers (example reseller listings in modest per-user/per-year ranges; vendor quotes are common)

Published per-user/month pricing varies by package (vendor-published MSRP available)

Often bundled into Microsoft licensing; public list pricing varies by plan/region; commonly purchased as P1/P2 add-on (exact current list price not captured in sources here)

Recommended for

SMB/mid-market wanting an augmentation layer for email security, potentially complementing an existing SEG and Microsoft 365

SMB/mid-market wanting an established SEG offering with clear tier packaging

Microsoft-centric organizations seeking integrated security tooling and consolidated licensing

Key Strengths

Cost-competitive positioning; reviewer-reported simpler administration; SAML SSO support; positioned to augment existing SEG filtering

Clear per-tier feature definitions and a broad ecosystem; URL defense, sandboxing, encryption, and BEC defenses depending on package

Tight integration with Microsoft 365 security tooling and identity; operational simplicity for organizations standardized on Microsoft

Key Weaknesses

Reported false positives and community-reported delivery incidents; less clearly published compliance and data residency details; potential feature gaps in advanced BEC/impersonation controls

Can become costly at higher tiers; some community commentary notes variability in post-acquisition support quality

Baseline Microsoft 365 filtering may require higher-tier licensing or add-ons for advanced capabilities