Winningtemp

Name: Winningtemp
Brand: Winningtemp

Based on science, fueled by data, and powered by AI, Winningtemp helps you listen your people, analyze the data, and act

Est 2011|Valuation $58.6M|Raised $21.9M|40 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 10K|Web traffic 139K|FTEs 90|HQ Oslo, Oslo, NO

MarketsEmployee Engagement & Survey Platforms

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Winningtemp is commonly compared to Culture Amp on analytics and benchmarking depth; Culture Amp has a larger review volume and is perceived as stronger for broad analytics. Winningtemp is perceived as focused on continuous listening and a more streamlined experience. - Compared with Peakon, Peakon is positioned as more enterprise-oriented with deeper analytics and commonly appears in enterprise procurement contexts. - Compared with Leapsome and Lattice, those competitors are often selected when buyers require a unified people suite that covers engagement, performance reviews, and career frameworks.

Adoption trends / market signals

Winningtemp has a historically strong presence in the Nordic market and expanded internationally after a funding event.
Review volumes are smaller than some category leaders, which may indicate a smaller footprint or lower review-campaign intensity.

	Winningtemp	Culture Amp	Workday Peakon Employee Voice
Starting Price	Quote-based (vendor page lists contact for pricing; some third-party listings show estimated starting prices)	Quote-based (annual; no public list price)	Quote-based; third-party listings indicate enterprise starting points
Best For	Organizations seeking frequent pulse surveys and anonymous feedback with a straightforward user experience and documented security/privacy certifications	Mid-market/enterprise needing broader benchmarks, people-science tooling, and extended analytics	Enterprise deployments seeking deep analytics and integration with the Workday ecosystem
Key Strength	Frequent pulse model and anonymous dialogue features; vendor lists recognized information security/privacy certifications	Market maturity, large review volume, broad benchmark ecosystem	Enterprise scale, mature analytics and theming capabilities
Key Weakness	Reported gaps in reporting depth and some performance complaints; limited public pricing transparency	Pricing opacity; can be costly for some buyers; program management overhead	Typically targeted at larger enterprises and may present procurement complexity

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Winningtemp is commonly compared to Culture Amp on analytics and benchmarking depth; Culture Amp has a larger review volume and is perceived as stronger for broad analytics. Winningtemp is perceived as focused on continuous listening and a more streamlined experience.
Compared with Peakon, Peakon is positioned as more enterprise-oriented with deeper analytics and commonly appears in enterprise procurement contexts.
Compared with Leapsome and Lattice, those competitors are often selected when buyers require a unified people suite that covers engagement, performance reviews, and career frameworks.

Adoption trends / market signals

Winningtemp has a historically strong presence in the Nordic market and expanded internationally after a funding event.
Review volumes are smaller than some category leaders, which may indicate a smaller footprint or lower review-campaign intensity.

	Winningtemp	Culture Amp	Workday Peakon Employee Voice
Starting Price	Quote-based (vendor page lists contact for pricing; some third-party listings show estimated starting prices)	Quote-based (annual; no public list price)	Quote-based; third-party listings indicate enterprise starting points
Best For	Organizations seeking frequent pulse surveys and anonymous feedback with a straightforward user experience and documented security/privacy certifications	Mid-market/enterprise needing broader benchmarks, people-science tooling, and extended analytics	Enterprise deployments seeking deep analytics and integration with the Workday ecosystem
Key Strength	Frequent pulse model and anonymous dialogue features; vendor lists recognized information security/privacy certifications	Market maturity, large review volume, broad benchmark ecosystem	Enterprise scale, mature analytics and theming capabilities
Key Weakness	Reported gaps in reporting depth and some performance complaints; limited public pricing transparency	Pricing opacity; can be costly for some buyers; program management overhead	Typically targeted at larger enterprises and may present procurement complexity