Clad

Name: Clad
Brand: Clad

AI Native

Project management and billing software for infrastructure.

Est 2022|Raised $500K|10 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 586|Web traffic 5K|FTEs 12|HQ New York, New York, US

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis (where alternatives may excel)

- Procore vs Clad: Procore is positioned as a comprehensive platform with ecosystem scale and extensive support resources, which can be important in multi-stakeholder projects. It tends to be quote-based and associated with heavier procurement and rollout. - Fieldwire vs Clad: Fieldwire emphasizes field execution, rapid setup, and published pricing (including a free tier), which can be advantageous for smaller teams or pilots. - Clad differentiation: A notable differentiator from public materials is the focus on infrastructure-specific workflows and the 811 ticket automation feature.

Market adoption trends

Clad has accelerator backing and is a small-team vendor. Public profiles list a small team size.
Competitors such as Procore and Fieldwire report broader market presence; these are vendor-published figures and should be validated independently.

	Clad	Procore	Fieldwire (Hilti)
Starting Price	Custom quote / sales-led	Custom quote / annual contract (enterprise model)	Free tier; paid tiers published (e.g., Pro/Business/Business Plus)
Best For	Infrastructure contractors/operators seeking production-to-billing, vendor compliance, and 811 workflows	Larger general contractors and owners needing broad construction collaboration and depth across modules	Field-first tasking, plans, markups; teams seeking transparent per-user pricing and rapid rollout
Key Strength	Integration of field production and billing; infrastructure-specific 811 ticket automation product	Ecosystem scale, broad module coverage, marketplace, large user base	Ease of adoption, mobile/offline field workflows; published pricing
Key Weakness	Limited public third-party validation and limited public security documentation	Can be expensive; implementation overhead; broader platform may exceed needs for niche infrastructure teams	May lack deep finance/ERP-grade controls; not purpose-built for telecom/utility contractor billing and compliance

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis (where alternatives may excel)

Procore vs Clad: Procore is positioned as a comprehensive platform with ecosystem scale and extensive support resources, which can be important in multi-stakeholder projects. It tends to be quote-based and associated with heavier procurement and rollout.
Fieldwire vs Clad: Fieldwire emphasizes field execution, rapid setup, and published pricing (including a free tier), which can be advantageous for smaller teams or pilots.
Clad differentiation: A notable differentiator from public materials is the focus on infrastructure-specific workflows and the 811 ticket automation feature.

Market adoption trends

Clad has accelerator backing and is a small-team vendor. Public profiles list a small team size.
Competitors such as Procore and Fieldwire report broader market presence; these are vendor-published figures and should be validated independently.

	Clad	Procore	Fieldwire (Hilti)
Starting Price	Custom quote / sales-led	Custom quote / annual contract (enterprise model)	Free tier; paid tiers published (e.g., Pro/Business/Business Plus)
Best For	Infrastructure contractors/operators seeking production-to-billing, vendor compliance, and 811 workflows	Larger general contractors and owners needing broad construction collaboration and depth across modules	Field-first tasking, plans, markups; teams seeking transparent per-user pricing and rapid rollout
Key Strength	Integration of field production and billing; infrastructure-specific 811 ticket automation product	Ecosystem scale, broad module coverage, marketplace, large user base	Ease of adoption, mobile/offline field workflows; published pricing
Key Weakness	Limited public third-party validation and limited public security documentation	Can be expensive; implementation overhead; broader platform may exceed needs for niche infrastructure teams	May lack deep finance/ERP-grade controls; not purpose-built for telecom/utility contractor billing and compliance

Clad

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis (where alternatives may excel)

Market adoption trends

02Market Map

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis (where alternatives may excel)

Market adoption trends

02Market Map