Community discussions reflect a mix of perspectives, often comparing ADDISON to DATEV and other providers.
1) Consideration driven by dissatisfaction with DATEV (translated):
> "aufgrund der ständigen Probleme, dem undurchsichtigen Wirrwarr und der fragwürdigen Preispolitik überlege ich derzeit von DATEV zu Addison zu wechseln."
(Translation: due to persistent problems, opaque processes, and questionable pricing policy, the commenter is considering switching from DATEV to Addison.)
This indicates that some practitioners consider ADDISON as an alternative when dissatisfied with DATEV.
2) Negative sentiment from a single commenter (translated):
> "Die Software nutzen nur Steuerberater die Geizhälse sind. Ich kenne niemanden der mit Addison freiwillig arbeiten würde."
(Translation: Only stingy tax advisors use the software. I don’t know anyone who would work with Addison voluntarily.)
This is an individual opinion and demonstrates brand perception risk among some users.
3) Positive mention unrelated to Controlling specifically (translated):
> "Nutze Addison von Wolters Kluwer, finde ich ganz angenehm, auch als angelernter Buchhalter"
(Translation: I use Addison and find it acceptable, even as a self-taught bookkeeper.)
This suggests some users find Addison usable in general accounting contexts, though it is not specific to the Controlling module.
Sources: Industry Reddit and community threads.