Wolters Kluwer ClientTime

Name: Wolters Kluwer ClientTime
Brand: Wolters Kluwer

Wolters Kluwer ClientTime is a practice-management module that provides calendar-style time registration, resource planning, billing/invoicing, and reporting integrated with client and task records.

Est 1836|Valuation $20.3B|Raised $840K

LinkedIn 357K|Website|Web traffic 3.0M|FTEs 21,000|HQ Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Where ClientTime may be most suitable: - Integrated workflow for firms using ClientView, providing a single-vendor workflow for client records, tasks, time, and billing - Built-in billing workflow and reporting that can reduce reconciliation work when compared with spreadsheet-based processes Where competitors may be more suitable: - Organizations requiring a dedicated PSA with broad integrations and advanced project economics may prefer a PSA-first product such as TimeLog PSA - Organizations seeking low-friction time capture tightly integrated to accounting systems may prefer e-conomic’s time registration - Field services or crafts-oriented businesses may prefer Minuba or Ordrestyring for job-order and materials flows Competitor positioning notes: - Ordrestyring targets digital time and materials registration transferred to invoicing drafts for crafts and field workflows - Minuba provides free-entry options and tiered plans focused on time/materials tracking and invoicing

	Wolters Kluwer ClientTime	TimeLog PSA	e-conomic Time Registration
Starting Price	Vendor-provided pricing / quote required	Published pricing varies; vendor quotes commonly used for PSA tiers	Typically offered as part of the e-conomic subscription or as add-ons; published pricing varies by plan
Primary Users	Denmark-based professional firms using ClientView needing integrated client/task/time/billing	PSA-oriented consulting and professional services teams needing end-to-end project economics & integrations	Organizations already standardized on e-conomic accounting wanting time capture into finance
Key Strength	Integration with ClientView; billing and reporting integrated; calendar-style time entry	Broad PSA functionality: project financials, utilization, integrations	Low friction for organizations already in the e-conomic ecosystem; mobile time registration
Key Weakness	Limited public product-specific documentation (reviews/pricing/security); appears region-limited	Can be heavier to implement; PSA complexity	May lack deep practice management and task orchestration compared with specialized suites

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Where ClientTime may be most suitable:

Integrated workflow for firms using ClientView, providing a single-vendor workflow for client records, tasks, time, and billing
Built-in billing workflow and reporting that can reduce reconciliation work when compared with spreadsheet-based processes

Where competitors may be more suitable:

Organizations requiring a dedicated PSA with broad integrations and advanced project economics may prefer a PSA-first product such as TimeLog PSA
Organizations seeking low-friction time capture tightly integrated to accounting systems may prefer e-conomic’s time registration
Field services or crafts-oriented businesses may prefer Minuba or Ordrestyring for job-order and materials flows

Competitor positioning notes:

Ordrestyring targets digital time and materials registration transferred to invoicing drafts for crafts and field workflows
Minuba provides free-entry options and tiered plans focused on time/materials tracking and invoicing

	Wolters Kluwer ClientTime	TimeLog PSA	e-conomic Time Registration
Starting Price	Vendor-provided pricing / quote required	Published pricing varies; vendor quotes commonly used for PSA tiers	Typically offered as part of the e-conomic subscription or as add-ons; published pricing varies by plan
Primary Users	Denmark-based professional firms using ClientView needing integrated client/task/time/billing	PSA-oriented consulting and professional services teams needing end-to-end project economics & integrations	Organizations already standardized on e-conomic accounting wanting time capture into finance
Key Strength	Integration with ClientView; billing and reporting integrated; calendar-style time entry	Broad PSA functionality: project financials, utilization, integrations	Low friction for organizations already in the e-conomic ecosystem; mobile time registration
Key Weakness	Limited public product-specific documentation (reviews/pricing/security); appears region-limited	Can be heavier to implement; PSA complexity	May lack deep practice management and task orchestration compared with specialized suites

Wolters Kluwer ClientTime

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

02Market Map

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

02Market Map