Wolters Kluwer TeamMate+ Agile Audit

Name: Wolters Kluwer TeamMate+ Agile Audit
Brand: Wolters Kluwer
Rating: 4.2 (576 reviews)

TeamMate+ Agile Audit is an agile-auditing module within Wolters Kluwer’s TeamMate+ platform that breaks audit work into 2–3 week stories, provides a Kanban-style board for transparency, and supports incremental reporting to accelerate stakeholder feedback and risk remediation.

Est 1836|Valuation $19.4B|Raised $840K

LinkedIn 357K|Website|Web traffic 3.0M|FTEs 21,000|HQ Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands

MarketsInternal Controls & Audit Management

Wolters Kluwer TeamMate+ Agile Audit screenshot

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

TeamMate+ vs AuditBoard - Some review aggregates and practitioner commentary indicate AuditBoard is frequently perceived to meet business needs better than TeamMate+ in certain buyer segments. This is an aggregate signal and not universal. - AuditBoard is sometimes characterized by users as higher cost compared with other evaluated tools. TeamMate+ vs Workiva - Workiva is discussed as a broader connected platform that can support reporting, compliance, and audit use cases across an organization. Some teams prefer consolidating workpapers and reporting in Workiva when a single platform for regulatory filings and related documentation is a strategic goal. - Workiva also receives community feedback about UI and narrative formatting challenges, which is relevant for document-centric audit teams. TeamMate+ vs Diligent - Diligent’s Audit Management solution is positioned as scalable and supportive of agile auditing concepts in some listings. Pricing is modular and quote-based; third-party sources sometimes cite relatively higher annual costs for certain tiers, but those figures are not official vendor pricing in most cases.

Adoption trends / market signals

Vendor-produced collateral referencing third-party review data (for example, public review platforms) should be interpreted with awareness of methodology and sourcing. Such materials provide directional signals rather than definitive market rankings.

	TeamMate+ Agile Audit	AuditBoard	Workiva (Audit Management / Wdesk)
Starting Price	Quote-based (vendor)	Quote-based (pricing available on request)	Quote-based; some public-sector documents show older pricing snapshots (not universal)
Best For	Internal audit teams seeking integrated audit workflows with an agile overlay	Enterprise teams seeking a broad audit/risk platform with strong market recognition	Organizations using Workiva for reporting/compliance that want connected workpapers and reporting workflows
Key Strength	Audit-focused workflow and long product lineage; agile concepts (sprints/Kanban) are available within the audit workflow	Strong market presence and buyer mindshare; frequently cited for usability in some reviews	Connected reporting/compliance ecosystem; may reduce duplicate work across reporting and audit functions
Key Weakness	Perceived UI friction and reporting/template formatting challenges; pricing via quote can limit transparency	Frequently cited as higher cost; community comments indicate perception of premium pricing	Some users report UI and copy/paste challenges for narrative outputs

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

TeamMate+ vs AuditBoard

Some review aggregates and practitioner commentary indicate AuditBoard is frequently perceived to meet business needs better than TeamMate+ in certain buyer segments. This is an aggregate signal and not universal.
AuditBoard is sometimes characterized by users as higher cost compared with other evaluated tools.

TeamMate+ vs Workiva

Workiva is discussed as a broader connected platform that can support reporting, compliance, and audit use cases across an organization. Some teams prefer consolidating workpapers and reporting in Workiva when a single platform for regulatory filings and related documentation is a strategic goal.
Workiva also receives community feedback about UI and narrative formatting challenges, which is relevant for document-centric audit teams.

TeamMate+ vs Diligent

Diligent’s Audit Management solution is positioned as scalable and supportive of agile auditing concepts in some listings. Pricing is modular and quote-based; third-party sources sometimes cite relatively higher annual costs for certain tiers, but those figures are not official vendor pricing in most cases.

Adoption trends / market signals

Vendor-produced collateral referencing third-party review data (for example, public review platforms) should be interpreted with awareness of methodology and sourcing. Such materials provide directional signals rather than definitive market rankings.

	TeamMate+ Agile Audit	AuditBoard	Workiva (Audit Management / Wdesk)
Starting Price	Quote-based (vendor)	Quote-based (pricing available on request)	Quote-based; some public-sector documents show older pricing snapshots (not universal)
Best For	Internal audit teams seeking integrated audit workflows with an agile overlay	Enterprise teams seeking a broad audit/risk platform with strong market recognition	Organizations using Workiva for reporting/compliance that want connected workpapers and reporting workflows
Key Strength	Audit-focused workflow and long product lineage; agile concepts (sprints/Kanban) are available within the audit workflow	Strong market presence and buyer mindshare; frequently cited for usability in some reviews	Connected reporting/compliance ecosystem; may reduce duplicate work across reporting and audit functions
Key Weakness	Perceived UI friction and reporting/template formatting challenges; pricing via quote can limit transparency	Frequently cited as higher cost; community comments indicate perception of premium pricing	Some users report UI and copy/paste challenges for narrative outputs