Worklytics

Name: Worklytics
Brand: Worklytics

The Work Insights Platform | Data and actionable metrics for People Analytics Teams

Est 2015|Raised $120K|3 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 6K|Website|Web traffic 5K|FTEs 14|HQ New York, New York, US

MarketsHR Analytics & Workforce Planning

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Areas of relative strength - Cross-platform coverage: the vendor emphasizes integrations across a broad set of collaboration tools and the ability to push cleaned data to BI tools or warehouses, which is useful in heterogeneous tool environments. - Privacy-oriented controls: public materials highlight proxy pseudonymization, minimum group sizes for reporting, and a metadata-focused approach. Where competitors may have advantages - Microsoft Viva Insights: may be a better fit where Microsoft 365 is the dominant collaboration platform because of built-in instrumentation and potential for lower integration effort. - Polinode: stronger orientation toward explicit ONA projects, including survey-based network mapping and published self-serve pricing for certain user segments. Market adoption signals - The vendor publishes enterprise logos and testimonials, maintains integration partnerships, and has affiliations with startup and accelerator programs, which indicate enterprise sales activity. Limited review-platform density suggests a reference-driven, enterprise sales motion rather than a high-volume self-serve model.

	Worklytics	Microsoft Viva Insights	Polinode
Starting Price	Not publicly published; free 30-day trial for the Insights Dashboard; enterprise quotes typical (third-party listings cite low per-user ranges that are not official)	Often bundled or available as add-ons in the Microsoft ecosystem; pricing varies by region and licensing	Public individual plans and some published pricing for self-serve offerings; organization-level pricing often requires contact with sales
Typical use case	Organizations seeking cross-tool passive analytics with configurable pseudonymization and export/warehouse integration	Microsoft 365-centric organizations seeking native integration and in-product insights	Teams conducting explicit ONA projects, combining survey-based and network analysis methods
Relative strengths	Broad connector coverage across many collaboration tools; emphasis on metadata pipelines and configurable pseudonymization	Native Microsoft integration, familiar compliance posture for Microsoft-centric enterprise buyers	Strong ONA tooling and self-serve options for consultants and researchers
Potential weaknesses	Limited public third-party review volume; pricing and some security artifacts gated behind procurement; governance complexity for connector permissions	May miss non-Microsoft collaboration signals in heterogeneous tool stacks	Less emphasis on passive, cross-tool data pipelines for large enterprise passive telemetry

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Areas of relative strength

Cross-platform coverage: the vendor emphasizes integrations across a broad set of collaboration tools and the ability to push cleaned data to BI tools or warehouses, which is useful in heterogeneous tool environments.
Privacy-oriented controls: public materials highlight proxy pseudonymization, minimum group sizes for reporting, and a metadata-focused approach.

Where competitors may have advantages

Microsoft Viva Insights: may be a better fit where Microsoft 365 is the dominant collaboration platform because of built-in instrumentation and potential for lower integration effort.
Polinode: stronger orientation toward explicit ONA projects, including survey-based network mapping and published self-serve pricing for certain user segments.

Market adoption signals

The vendor publishes enterprise logos and testimonials, maintains integration partnerships, and has affiliations with startup and accelerator programs, which indicate enterprise sales activity. Limited review-platform density suggests a reference-driven, enterprise sales motion rather than a high-volume self-serve model.

	Worklytics	Microsoft Viva Insights	Polinode
Starting Price	Not publicly published; free 30-day trial for the Insights Dashboard; enterprise quotes typical (third-party listings cite low per-user ranges that are not official)	Often bundled or available as add-ons in the Microsoft ecosystem; pricing varies by region and licensing	Public individual plans and some published pricing for self-serve offerings; organization-level pricing often requires contact with sales
Typical use case	Organizations seeking cross-tool passive analytics with configurable pseudonymization and export/warehouse integration	Microsoft 365-centric organizations seeking native integration and in-product insights	Teams conducting explicit ONA projects, combining survey-based and network analysis methods
Relative strengths	Broad connector coverage across many collaboration tools; emphasis on metadata pipelines and configurable pseudonymization	Native Microsoft integration, familiar compliance posture for Microsoft-centric enterprise buyers	Strong ONA tooling and self-serve options for consultants and researchers
Potential weaknesses	Limited public third-party review volume; pricing and some security artifacts gated behind procurement; governance complexity for connector permissions	May miss non-Microsoft collaboration signals in heterogeneous tool stacks	Less emphasis on passive, cross-tool data pipelines for large enterprise passive telemetry