Workyard

Name: Workyard
Brand: Workyard

Time Tracking & Workforce Management for Construction

Est 2016|Valuation $46.9M|Raised $18.8M|5 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 17K|Web traffic 48K|FTEs 71|HQ San Francisco, California, US

MarketsTime, Attendance, & Leave Management

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Workyard vs QuickBooks Time: - QuickBooks Time provides transparent per-user plus base-fee pricing and integrates with the Intuit ecosystem. - Workyard emphasizes construction-specific job/site logic and job-costing workflows, with reported concerns about GPS reliability and the company base fee that buyers should evaluate. - Workyard vs Timeero: - Timeero often appears cheaper at entry and has straightforward pricing tiers. - Workyard focuses on construction job/site logic and deeper job-costing emphasis; Timeero may be preferred for simpler deployments or tighter budgets. - Workyard vs Connecteam: - Connecteam offers low-entry options and broad employee communications/HR features. - Workyard is more specialized in GPS-verified labor tracking and construction job-costing; Connecteam may be preferable when an all-in-one employee app is required across many non-construction workflows. - Workyard vs Procore: - Procore is a full construction management platform with quote-based pricing and broader functionality. - Workyard may be a more focused choice when the primary need is field labor time accuracy, payroll exports, and job-costing without adopting a broader construction-management suite.

	Workyard	QuickBooks Time	Timeero
Starting Price	Low per-user entry with a company base fee (Starter)	Per-user pricing with a company base fee	Lower per-user entry aimed at smaller teams
Typical Use Case	Construction crews needing GPS-verified timecards and job-cost visibility	Organizations using Intuit/QuickBooks seeking time-to-payroll sync	Smaller field teams needing GPS and mileage tracking with a lower entry cost
Key Strength	Construction-oriented GPS verification and job-cost workflows	Tight integration with QuickBooks and payroll workflows	Lower per-user entry and straightforward tiering
Key Weakness	Fixed company base fee; some reports of GPS/location issues; limited public security certification evidence	Can be costly at scale; less construction-specific job-costing depth	Feature depth may be lower for complex construction workflows

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Workyard vs QuickBooks Time:
- QuickBooks Time provides transparent per-user plus base-fee pricing and integrates with the Intuit ecosystem.
- Workyard emphasizes construction-specific job/site logic and job-costing workflows, with reported concerns about GPS reliability and the company base fee that buyers should evaluate.
Workyard vs Timeero:
- Timeero often appears cheaper at entry and has straightforward pricing tiers.
- Workyard focuses on construction job/site logic and deeper job-costing emphasis; Timeero may be preferred for simpler deployments or tighter budgets.
Workyard vs Connecteam:
- Connecteam offers low-entry options and broad employee communications/HR features.
- Workyard is more specialized in GPS-verified labor tracking and construction job-costing; Connecteam may be preferable when an all-in-one employee app is required across many non-construction workflows.
Workyard vs Procore:
- Procore is a full construction management platform with quote-based pricing and broader functionality.
- Workyard may be a more focused choice when the primary need is field labor time accuracy, payroll exports, and job-costing without adopting a broader construction-management suite.

	Workyard	QuickBooks Time	Timeero
Starting Price	Low per-user entry with a company base fee (Starter)	Per-user pricing with a company base fee	Lower per-user entry aimed at smaller teams
Typical Use Case	Construction crews needing GPS-verified timecards and job-cost visibility	Organizations using Intuit/QuickBooks seeking time-to-payroll sync	Smaller field teams needing GPS and mileage tracking with a lower entry cost
Key Strength	Construction-oriented GPS verification and job-cost workflows	Tight integration with QuickBooks and payroll workflows	Lower per-user entry and straightforward tiering
Key Weakness	Fixed company base fee; some reports of GPS/location issues; limited public security certification evidence	Can be costly at scale; less construction-specific job-costing depth	Feature depth may be lower for complex construction workflows