WorldOver
AI NativeThe operating system for contract manufacturers, brands and ingredient providers.
Est 2022|Valuation $23M|Raised $6.7M
Published Sep 20, 2026
| Starting Price | Not publicly listed (demo/quote-led) | Public pricing page exists; full module access appears quote-led; base plans shown | Not publicly listed (enterprise/quote-led) |
| Primary fit | Brands and manufacturers seeking consolidated product data and compliance workflows with automation features | Cosmetics compliance teams needing regulatory screening and PIF generation; specialist in cosmetics deliverables | Retail and supply-chain product compliance and transparency; SDS access workflows for retail customers |
| Noted strengths | Integrated platform combining product data and compliance-related features; early-stage investor backing | Clear cosmetics compliance module framing; explicit tools for PIF and ingredient listings | Established compliance infrastructure brand; retail-oriented compliance workflows |
| Noted weaknesses | Limited third-party review presence; security documentation not fully public; no published pricing | May be more focused on compliance modules than full PLM/workflow coverage | May be less tailored to cosmetics-specific formulation and PIF workflows |
—
WorldOver vs SDS/label specialists (LISAM, Selerant Hazex, SDS Manager): Dedicated SDS/label vendors typically have long-established rule engines, templates, and regulatory content for GHS/CLP/OSHA. If SDS authoring is the primary requirement, mature, dedicated vendors may offer deeper, time-tested capabilities.
WorldOver vs quality/eQMS tools (Qualio): eQMS vendors focus on audit readiness and regulated quality processes (e.g., CAPA, training, document control). For organizations where QMS processes are primary, a dedicated eQMS may be a more direct fit.
WorldOver vs IngredientSafe (Ithos Global): IngredientSafe emphasizes cosmetics-specific compliance deliverables such as PIF generation and regulatory screening. WorldOver’s broader platform approach may be beneficial for consolidation but may require more configuration and validation for specific compliance outputs.