Yac
Voice Messaging For Remote Teams
Est 2019|Valuation $30M|Raised $9.4M
Published Jul 15, 2026
| Starting Price | Free; published per-seat pricing available for teams | Free tier; paid tiers with published pricing available from the vendor | Published business-tier per-user pricing available from the vendor |
| Intended Use | Async voice + quick context sharing for remote teams; positioned to reduce scheduled meetings | Screen + camera video messaging for demos, training, and polished async video | Push-to-talk / voice messaging for field teams and walkie-talkie patterns |
| Key Strength | Voice-focused communication, transcription search (paid), share links, meeting-reduction potential | Polished screen + facecam recording and sharing experience | Established push-to-talk UX and category familiarity |
| Key Weakness | Integration friction and additional tool surface; pending SOC 2 certification; UI learning curve | Potential for video sprawl and higher overhead for producing videos | Less oriented to threaded async work context compared with Yac or Loom |
—
Where Yac appears to be relatively strong
Where alternatives may be preferable
Competitor examples and positioning notes