Yardstik

Name: Yardstik
Brand: Yardstik
Rating: 4.8 (37 reviews)

Human Trust Platform: Continuous Monitoring, Screening, Fraud Prevention, and Credential Verification Technology

Est 2019|Valuation $72M|Raised $64M

LinkedIn 4K|Web traffic 336K|FTEs 71|HQ Minneapolis, MN

MarketsInterviewing & Assessment

Where Yardstik appears to be relatively strong:

Integration-focused delivery that embeds screening actions in ATS/CRM workflows.
Reported responsiveness to customers in reviews supporting integration projects and account management.
Packaging flexibility via modular screening packages available through partners.

Where competitors may have advantages:

Transparent public pricing and self-serve onboarding may be stronger at some competitors.
Larger incumbent providers may offer broader international coverage and longer-established enterprise processes.

Where Yardstik appears to be relatively strong: - Integration-focused delivery that embeds screening actions in ATS/CRM workflows. - Reported responsiveness to customers in reviews supporting integration projects and account management. - Packaging flexibility via modular screening packages available through partners. Where competitors may have advantages: - Transparent public pricing and self-serve onboarding may be stronger at some competitors. - Larger incumbent providers may offer broader international coverage and longer-established enterprise processes.

	Yardstik	Checkr	Certn
Starting Price	Not consistently published; partner examples show published per-screen/package pricing examples	Publicly listed entry-level pricing examples available	Publicly listed entry-level pricing examples available
Typical Fit	High-volume hiring and platform embedding with API integrations	Self-serve and enterprise customers seeking transparent menus	Price-sensitive teams seeking self-serve checks
Key Strength	Integration-focused delivery and partner integrations	Public pricing transparency and broad ecosystem	Lower entry price and simple packages
Key Weakness	Less standardized public pricing; many partner-driven pricing examples	Pass-through fees and some dispute/process complaints in reviews	Coverage/depth may vary compared with large legacy CRAs

	Yardstik	Checkr	Certn
Starting Price	Not consistently published; partner examples show published per-screen/package pricing examples	Publicly listed entry-level pricing examples available	Publicly listed entry-level pricing examples available
Typical Fit	High-volume hiring and platform embedding with API integrations	Self-serve and enterprise customers seeking transparent menus	Price-sensitive teams seeking self-serve checks
Key Strength	Integration-focused delivery and partner integrations	Public pricing transparency and broad ecosystem	Lower entry price and simple packages
Key Weakness	Less standardized public pricing; many partner-driven pricing examples	Pass-through fees and some dispute/process complaints in reviews	Coverage/depth may vary compared with large legacy CRAs

Yardstik

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis