#### Differentiators
- Zama (FHE): aims to provide programmable confidentiality where contracts can define decryption permissions and remain composable with non-confidential contracts. This approach may be appealing if teams want privacy without migrating users to a separate privacy chain.
- Aztec (ZK): provides privacy via zero-knowledge proofs, with different performance and developer trade-offs; it often requires different programming patterns.
- Secret Network (TEE): uses TEEs for confidentiality and may be more practical for certain compute patterns but requires different trust and hardware assumptions.
#### Pricing/value comparison
- Zama’s lack of a public price list and requirement for a commercial patent license make early cost estimation more difficult than some alternatives that rely primarily on network fees or marketplace pricing.
#### Market adoption and trends
- Press coverage documents funding and industry interest in FHE-based confidentiality, but broader adoption is still emergent and will depend on mainnet maturity, independent benchmarks, and developer experience.