Zoom Whiteboard

Name: Zoom Whiteboard
Brand: Zoom Communications
Rating: 4.4 (156 reviews)

Leader

AI-First Work Platform for Human Connection ✨

Est 2011|Valuation $27.6B|Raised $874.4M

LinkedIn 675K|Website|Web traffic 96.2M|FTEs 7,438|HQ San Jose, California, US

MarketsProduct Design / Ideation Productivity & Collaboration Suite

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative comparison

- Zoom Whiteboard vs Miro/Mural: Zoom provides integration and procurement simplicity for Zoom-centric organizations. Dedicated platforms typically offer greater product maturity (advanced facilitation features, diagramming depth) and a broader set of facilitation tools. - Zoom Whiteboard vs Microsoft Whiteboard: Microsoft Whiteboard often aligns with organizations standardized on Microsoft 365 and stores content in OneDrive for Business/Azure. Microsoft-centric governance and compliance controls may make Microsoft Whiteboard preferable for those environments, while Zoom Whiteboard may better serve Zoom-first meeting workflows.

Customer testimonials comparing products

Community posts include direct comparisons favoring mature, specialized platforms such as Miro and Mural for advanced facilitation and reliability in high-dependency scenarios.

Market adoption trends

Independent coverage frames Zoom’s Whiteboard updates as part of a broader push by collaboration vendors to improve whiteboarding capabilities for hybrid work. Whiteboarding has become a core capability expected in many collaboration suites.

	Zoom Whiteboard	Miro	Mural
Starting Price	Whiteboard Basic: Free (limited number of editable boards); paid add-on available with published per-seat pricing from the vendor	Free tier with limited editable boards; paid starter plan available with published per-seat annual pricing from the vendor	Free tier with limited murals; paid Team-tier plans available with published per-seat annual pricing from the vendor
Best For	Teams already on Zoom needing integrated, low-overhead whiteboarding in meetings	Dedicated visual collaboration with extensive templates, integrations, and facilitation tooling	Facilitated workshops and enterprise collaboration controls with facilitation tooling
Key Strength	Tight Zoom Meetings/Rooms integration; persistent boards in Zoom ecosystem	Mature feature depth, large template ecosystem, broad integrations	Strong facilitation orientation; enterprise controls and governance features
Key Weakness	Community-reported performance and UX regressions; less mature than specialized platforms for advanced scenarios	Can be costly at scale; licensing complexity for some organizations	Higher per-seat cost than simple Zoom add-ons; may exceed needs for lightweight use

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative comparison

Zoom Whiteboard vs Miro/Mural: Zoom provides integration and procurement simplicity for Zoom-centric organizations. Dedicated platforms typically offer greater product maturity (advanced facilitation features, diagramming depth) and a broader set of facilitation tools.
Zoom Whiteboard vs Microsoft Whiteboard: Microsoft Whiteboard often aligns with organizations standardized on Microsoft 365 and stores content in OneDrive for Business/Azure. Microsoft-centric governance and compliance controls may make Microsoft Whiteboard preferable for those environments, while Zoom Whiteboard may better serve Zoom-first meeting workflows.

Customer testimonials comparing products

Community posts include direct comparisons favoring mature, specialized platforms such as Miro and Mural for advanced facilitation and reliability in high-dependency scenarios.

Market adoption trends

	Zoom Whiteboard	Miro	Mural
Starting Price	Whiteboard Basic: Free (limited number of editable boards); paid add-on available with published per-seat pricing from the vendor	Free tier with limited editable boards; paid starter plan available with published per-seat annual pricing from the vendor	Free tier with limited murals; paid Team-tier plans available with published per-seat annual pricing from the vendor
Best For	Teams already on Zoom needing integrated, low-overhead whiteboarding in meetings	Dedicated visual collaboration with extensive templates, integrations, and facilitation tooling	Facilitated workshops and enterprise collaboration controls with facilitation tooling
Key Strength	Tight Zoom Meetings/Rooms integration; persistent boards in Zoom ecosystem	Mature feature depth, large template ecosystem, broad integrations	Strong facilitation orientation; enterprise controls and governance features
Key Weakness	Community-reported performance and UX regressions; less mature than specialized platforms for advanced scenarios	Can be costly at scale; licensing complexity for some organizations	Higher per-seat cost than simple Zoom add-ons; may exceed needs for lightweight use