Zyvka

Name: Zyvka
Brand: Zyvka

AI Native

AI-Powered Hiring & Skilling Solutions

Est 2021|Valuation $1.8M|Raised $15.1M

LinkedIn 50K|Website|FTEs 33|HQ Sacramento, California, US

MarketsApplicant Tracking Systems (ATS)Sourcing & Recruitment Marketing

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Zyvka versus Paradox: Paradox is established for chat-based automation and scheduling at enterprise scale and is typically sold via annual contracts. Zyvka appears to offer a lower-friction on-ramp with published monthly pricing and a greater emphasis on outbound voice calls.
Zyvka versus HireVue: HireVue is commonly associated with video interviewing and assessment workflows and has more visible security and compliance documentation. Zyvka’s potential advantages include entry-level pricing and outbound voice automation; incumbents may have advantages in procurement artifacts and enterprise governance.

- Zyvka versus Paradox: Paradox is established for chat-based automation and scheduling at enterprise scale and is typically sold via annual contracts. Zyvka appears to offer a lower-friction on-ramp with published monthly pricing and a greater emphasis on outbound voice calls. - Zyvka versus HireVue: HireVue is commonly associated with video interviewing and assessment workflows and has more visible security and compliance documentation. Zyvka’s potential advantages include entry-level pricing and outbound voice automation; incumbents may have advantages in procurement artifacts and enterprise governance.

Market share and adoption trends

No credible public market share data specific to Zyvka was identified in the accessible sources during this review.

	Zyvka (Astra Agent)	Paradox (Olivia)	HireVue
Starting Price	Free tier; published monthly tiers and pay-as-you-go options available from the vendor	Typically custom enterprise pricing; third-party commentary suggests mid-market entry points	Enterprise pricing with higher entry points reported by third-party commentary
Typical Use Case	High-volume outbound voice screening and initial candidate outreach with published entry pricing	Multi-location employers requiring chat/SMS automation and ATS integrations	Enterprise video interviewing and assessments with compliance features
Strengths	Published entry pricing and a free tier for voice-agent usage; voice calls with transcripts and analytics	Mature enterprise integrations and omnichannel conversational workflows	Established enterprise security and compliance artifacts and large-scale assessment workflows
Weaknesses	Limited independent public review footprint and limited publicly documented security/compliance artifacts	Pricing opacity and contractual commitments for enterprise deployments	Higher cost and complexity for smaller organizations