Butterfly.ai

Name: Butterfly.ai
Brand: Butterfly.ai (an Engagedly company)
Rating: 4.4 (59 reviews)

An intuitive feedback tool to retain & engage your frontline employees

Est 2017|Valuation $12.5M|Raised $3M|5 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 2K|Website|FTEs 11|HQ Brooklyn, New York, US

MarketsEmployee Engagement & Survey Platforms

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Butterfly.ai has a relatively limited public review footprint compared with larger competitors, which reduces the statistical reliability of sentiment signals. - Competitors such as Culture Amp, Qualtrics, and Glint generally provide broader analytics, benchmarks, and enterprise survey governance. Lattice and 15Five provide wider performance and growth module coverage. - Since Butterfly.ai is part of Engagedly, prospective buyers should evaluate Butterfly.ai capabilities within the broader Engagedly product portfolio rather than assuming a standalone product fit.

When customers choose competitors instead (typical reasons)

Common reasons organizations select alternative vendors include:

Requirement for advanced analytics, benchmarking, and enterprise survey governance.
Desire for an integrated performance management and engagement suite with OKRs, 1:1s, and growth plans.
Need for standardized enterprise procurement and security packages commonly provided by larger vendors.

	Butterfly.ai	Culture Amp	Lattice
Starting Price	Third-party listing shows a published starting price on a vendor review site (listing had few or no reviews at the time)	Pricing typically quote-based; third-party sources indicate published per-employee ranges (verify with vendor)	Pricing commonly modular and quote-based depending on selected packages
Recommended For	Organizations seeking frequent anonymous pulse feedback with manager-focused insights; may suit frontline-oriented teams	Organizations seeking advanced engagement surveys, analytics, and benchmarking	Organizations seeking combined performance management and engagement workflows with configurable modules
Key Strength	Focus on frequent pulse feedback and anonymity-focused workflows (per reviewer excerpts)	Depth of survey methodology, analytics, and benchmarking capabilities	Broad HR suite capabilities including performance, 1:1s, and development workflows
Key Weakness	Reported integration reliability issues and limited independent review volume	Perceived cost and implementation overhead for some buyers	Can become complex and costly as modules are added

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Butterfly.ai has a relatively limited public review footprint compared with larger competitors, which reduces the statistical reliability of sentiment signals.
Competitors such as Culture Amp, Qualtrics, and Glint generally provide broader analytics, benchmarks, and enterprise survey governance. Lattice and 15Five provide wider performance and growth module coverage.
Since Butterfly.ai is part of Engagedly, prospective buyers should evaluate Butterfly.ai capabilities within the broader Engagedly product portfolio rather than assuming a standalone product fit.

When customers choose competitors instead (typical reasons)

Common reasons organizations select alternative vendors include:

Requirement for advanced analytics, benchmarking, and enterprise survey governance.
Desire for an integrated performance management and engagement suite with OKRs, 1:1s, and growth plans.
Need for standardized enterprise procurement and security packages commonly provided by larger vendors.

	Butterfly.ai	Culture Amp	Lattice
Starting Price	Third-party listing shows a published starting price on a vendor review site (listing had few or no reviews at the time)	Pricing typically quote-based; third-party sources indicate published per-employee ranges (verify with vendor)	Pricing commonly modular and quote-based depending on selected packages
Recommended For	Organizations seeking frequent anonymous pulse feedback with manager-focused insights; may suit frontline-oriented teams	Organizations seeking advanced engagement surveys, analytics, and benchmarking	Organizations seeking combined performance management and engagement workflows with configurable modules
Key Strength	Focus on frequent pulse feedback and anonymity-focused workflows (per reviewer excerpts)	Depth of survey methodology, analytics, and benchmarking capabilities	Broad HR suite capabilities including performance, 1:1s, and development workflows
Key Weakness	Reported integration reliability issues and limited independent review volume	Perceived cost and implementation overhead for some buyers	Can become complex and costly as modules are added