Check Point Email Security Services

Name: Check Point Email Security Services
Brand: Check Point Software Technologies
Rating: 4.6 (1331 reviews)

Leader

Customers rely on Lakera for real-time security that doesn’t slow down their GenAI applications.

Est 1993|Valuation $13.7B|Raised $1.8B

LinkedIn 11K|Website|Web traffic 2.0M|FTEs 6,825|HQ San Francisco, CA

MarketsCloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP)Web Application & API Protection (WAAP)Security Service Edge (SSE)Email Security Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)Productivity & Collaboration Suite

Published Oct 15, 2026

01Common complaints

- Organizations that require a fully on-premises, non-cloud email security solution and minimal cloud dependency. - Organizations that cannot tolerate any vendor-related outages affecting mail flow; perform thorough failover and resilience testing if continuity is critical. - Organizations that need highly transparent, standardized self-service pricing across channels (pricing is often channel-driven and may vary by reseller and MSP program). - Organizations prioritizing continuity/archiving-first capabilities over threat prevention; gateway/archiving-focused vendors may offer a closer match depending on package selection. - Organizations with strict controls that prohibit granting higher-privilege integration scopes for Google Workspace, unless the vendor can document and support a least-privilege integration model that meets audit requirements.

Poor fit / disqualifiers

Organizations requiring fully on-premises email security with minimal cloud dependency
Environments that cannot tolerate any added delivery latency or vendor dependency in mail flow
Organizations seeking highly standardized, self-serve pricing across channels
Environments unwilling to grant specified integration privileges for Google Workspace without compensating controls

Reported limitations from community feedback

Email delays and deliverability incidents reported by some users
Mail authentication interactions (e.g., DKIM-related scenarios) that have caused issues in specific environments; causes vary by configuration
Limitations reported in overriding Microsoft spam verdicts in some integration scenarios

Vendor-documented limitations

Public product pages and marketing collateral focus on plans and feature tiers; detailed operational limits (API rate limits, maximum tenant sizes, RTO/RPO commitments) are not broadly documented in publicly accessible marketing content

Roadmap signals

Public blog posts and vendor announcements indicate ongoing product development (for example, updates to Security Awareness Training modules). Specific roadmap timelines for core detection or architecture changes are typically not disclosed publicly.

02Why they buy

Key differentiators supported by available evidence (subject to buyer validation)

API-based architecture and post-delivery/internal message scanning approaches are central elements of Check Point’s positioning.
Coverage of collaboration tools (Teams, SharePoint, OneDrive, Slack) in addition to email is emphasized in vendor materials.
Some community proof-of-concept reports indicate detection improvements for phishing in certain deployments; buyers should validate detection claims through PoV testing.

Areas where competitors may have an advantage

Proofpoint: deep enterprise ecosystem and a long history of deployments in large organizations.
Mimecast: continuity, archiving, and resilience-focused offerings.
Abnormal Security: behavioral and BEC-focused detection capabilities.

03Field reports

Review platforms (what was accessible)

- G2: Check Point product review pages cover the broader Check Point portfolio; reviews reference themes relevant to administration, including security capabilities and centralized management versus configuration complexity. - PeerSpot: Product-specific PeerSpot entries for Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration include user commentary about integration, user interface feedback, and perceptions of pricing fairness and time savings. - Gartner Peer Insights: A compare page was located, but detailed content may be access-limited without subscription.

Community (Reddit) — examples

> “We use Check Point and it seems to work fine. I used to be logged into the email security system for hours each month, now I barely look at it as it ‘just works’.” — Reddit sysadmin community thread discussing anti-spam cloud services. > “Of all the changes we made recently, Check Point and Halcyon.ai were the two biggest contributors to our security.” — Reddit sysadmin community thread comparing Proofpoint vs Check Point (Avanan). > “Got talked into a CheckPoint Harmony POC… seems to detect far more phishing emails…” — Reddit vendor-specific community thread discussing a POC. Community commentary also includes negative reports and operational concerns, summarized below.

Community — negative sentiment examples / complaints

> “Checkpoint discontinuing their Protect License and all clients will be automatically pay more.” — Reddit MSP community thread on licensing/SKU changes (claims based on vendor communications reported by a channel partner). > “Is anyone else currently experiencing delays with outbound email while using Avanan / Check Point?” — Reddit MSP discussion about delivery delays. > “I’m assuming this is caused by the AWS outage but emails sent to Checkpoints Harmony Email service are being dropped.” — Reddit Check Point community thread reporting delivery failures. > “Check Point Harmony’s email scanning product creates a Super Admin user…” — Reddit cybersecurity thread raising concerns about Google Workspace admin privileges.

Common reasons cited for selecting the product (themes)

Reported improvements in phishing and BEC detection during proof-of-concepts (POCs) in some customer accounts
API-based integration perceived as an alternative to gateway-based management
Coverage of collaboration applications in addition to email
Reports of reduced manual workload for quarantine and investigation activities in some deployments

Common reasons cited for considering replacement or change (themes)

Email delays and instances of delivery/reliability incidents in community reports
Licensing and SKU changes that have led to renewal concerns among channel partners
Concerns about required privilege scopes for Google Workspace integration
Perceived integration gaps outside Microsoft and Google ecosystems

Vendor case study examples (limited verification)

Check Point publishes customer stories and PDF case studies referencing Harmony Email & Collaboration, including examples from specific customers.

Critical evaluation:

Metrics and outcomes in vendor case studies are vendor-published and may not disclose methodology, baselines, or time windows. These should be treated as directional indicators rather than independently validated proof.

Recommended diligence requests

Ask vendors or references for:

before-and-after metrics for phishing click-through rates, BEC incidents, and time-to-remediate
independent or third-party validation where available (audits, incident reports)
quantifiable admin time savings (for example, ticket volumes or SOC metrics)

04Best fit

Company sizes

Typical fit: mid-market to large enterprise organizations
Also deployed via MSPs for smaller organizations, with fit depending on the MSP’s operational model and the customer’s ability to use the toolset effectively

Industries

Finance, manufacturing, construction, government/regulated sectors are represented in vendor materials and community references

Roles/personas

Decision makers: Chief Information Security Officer (CISO), Head of IT/Security, Security Architect
Operational users: SOC analysts, email administrators, Microsoft 365/Google Workspace administrators, helpdesk staff

Fit criteria

Organizations using Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace
High exposure to phishing and BEC risk
Interest in extending protection to collaboration applications (Teams, SharePoint, OneDrive, Slack)
Willingness to invest in configuration, tuning, and administrative processes to realize benefits

05The pitch

What the product does (objective description)

Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration (formerly Avanan) is a cloud-delivered solution designed to protect Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace email and adjacent collaboration applications (e.g., Teams, OneDrive, SharePoint, Slack) from phishing, malware, business email compromise (BEC)/impersonation, and data leakage. The product uses API-based integration and in-line protection approaches as alternatives to legacy MX-record secure email gateways. Key product pages and collateral describe the solution as: - A security layer positioned before the inbox for email threats (vendor framing) - Protection that extends to collaboration applications beyond email - A layered detection stack that includes sandboxing and threat extraction in higher tiers

Target market and positioning

Mid-market to enterprise, including regulated industries, plus MSP/MSSP channel distribution.
Positioned against Proofpoint, Mimecast, Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Barracuda, and API-native vendors such as Abnormal Security.
Messaging emphasizes API-based cloud email protection, claims of rapid deployment, reported detection rates, and reduced administrative effort in operations.

Get a comprehensive analysis of Check Point Email Security Services including market position, competitive landscape, adoption trends, and peer benchmarks.

Download full report →