Check Point Email Security Services

Name: Check Point Email Security Services
Brand: Check Point Software Technologies
Rating: 4.6 (1331 reviews)

Leader

Customers rely on Lakera for real-time security that doesn’t slow down their GenAI applications.

Est 1993|Valuation $14.1B|Raised $1.8B

LinkedIn 11K|Website|Web traffic 2.0M|FTEs 6,825|HQ San Francisco, CA

MarketsCloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP)Web Application & API Protection (WAAP)Security Service Edge (SSE)Email Security Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)Productivity & Collaboration Suite

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

- Versus Proofpoint: Proofpoint is often included in enterprise shortlists and has a long deployment history in larger organizations. Harmony differentiates by emphasizing API-based approaches and coverage of collaboration tools. - Versus Mimecast: Mimecast often appeals to organizations looking for continuity/archiving and gateway-style deployments. Harmony may be selected by teams preferring API integrations and avoiding MX cutovers, depending on deployment requirements. - Versus Microsoft Defender for Office 365: Many organizations retain Defender for Office 365 as a baseline. Harmony is evaluated as an additional layer; incremental value depends on detection differential and operational workflow improvements. - Versus Abnormal Security: Abnormal is commonly evaluated for behavioral and BEC detection. Harmony competes on broader threat coverage and collaboration app protection; buyer selection depends on which threat vectors (BEC/impersonation vs malware/link threats) and app coverage are priorities.

	Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration	Proofpoint (Essentials/Email Protection)	Mimecast Email Security
Starting Price	Not consistently published; examples include public procurement listings showing published per-user/year rates and partner documents that show tiered pricing	Example reseller listings indicate low published per-user/month pricing for some business tiers; published per-user pricing available from resellers	Often "contact sales"; public procurement and partner documents show published per-user/month tiering via managed services listings
Typical Use Case	Microsoft 365 / Google Workspace organizations seeking API-based, collaboration-suite coverage	Organizations selecting established secure email gateway and enterprise feature set	Organizations prioritizing continuity/archiving plus email security in regulated environments
Key Strength	API-native integration approach; coverage of collaboration applications; reports of detection improvements in some POCs	Broad enterprise feature set and ecosystem integrations; common enterprise deployment patterns	Integrated continuity/archiving features; established gateway-style deployment benefits
Key Weakness	Community reports of delays/outages; licensing changes reported by channel partners; concerns about integration privileges for Google Workspace	Can be complex to deploy and manage in certain environments; enterprise pricing complexity	Pricing transparency and potential add-on costs; complexity in some enterprise deployments

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Versus Proofpoint: Proofpoint is often included in enterprise shortlists and has a long deployment history in larger organizations. Harmony differentiates by emphasizing API-based approaches and coverage of collaboration tools.
Versus Mimecast: Mimecast often appeals to organizations looking for continuity/archiving and gateway-style deployments. Harmony may be selected by teams preferring API integrations and avoiding MX cutovers, depending on deployment requirements.
Versus Microsoft Defender for Office 365: Many organizations retain Defender for Office 365 as a baseline. Harmony is evaluated as an additional layer; incremental value depends on detection differential and operational workflow improvements.
Versus Abnormal Security: Abnormal is commonly evaluated for behavioral and BEC detection. Harmony competes on broader threat coverage and collaboration app protection; buyer selection depends on which threat vectors (BEC/impersonation vs malware/link threats) and app coverage are priorities.

	Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration	Proofpoint (Essentials/Email Protection)	Mimecast Email Security
Starting Price	Not consistently published; examples include public procurement listings showing published per-user/year rates and partner documents that show tiered pricing	Example reseller listings indicate low published per-user/month pricing for some business tiers; published per-user pricing available from resellers	Often "contact sales"; public procurement and partner documents show published per-user/month tiering via managed services listings
Typical Use Case	Microsoft 365 / Google Workspace organizations seeking API-based, collaboration-suite coverage	Organizations selecting established secure email gateway and enterprise feature set	Organizations prioritizing continuity/archiving plus email security in regulated environments
Key Strength	API-native integration approach; coverage of collaboration applications; reports of detection improvements in some POCs	Broad enterprise feature set and ecosystem integrations; common enterprise deployment patterns	Integrated continuity/archiving features; established gateway-style deployment benefits
Key Weakness	Community reports of delays/outages; licensing changes reported by channel partners; concerns about integration privileges for Google Workspace	Can be complex to deploy and manage in certain environments; enterprise pricing complexity	Pricing transparency and potential add-on costs; complexity in some enterprise deployments