Clear Review

Name: Clear Review
Brand: Clear Review
Rating: 4.5 (143 reviews)

Powering the world of work

Est 2014|Valuation $33.5M|Raised $4M|14 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 92K|Website|Web traffic 3K|FTEs 40|HQ Birmingham, England, GB

MarketsHuman Resource Information Systems (HRIS)Performance Management

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

Where Clear Review may be a pragmatic choice: - Buyers operating within UK public sector procurement frameworks (G-Cloud) or those that prioritize alignment with OneAdvanced portfolio capabilities. - Organizations that prefer an approach oriented to continuous performance conversations and that value public procurement availability. Sources: - Public procurement listing on G-Cloud digital marketplace - Vendor announcement / acquisition overview page Where alternatives may be stronger: - Organizations that require clearly published, product-specific security documentation (SOC 2/ISO attestations, subprocessor lists, detailed technical security pages). Many HR tech vendors publish detailed trust center pages; a Clear Review-specific public trust page was not obvious in this research. - Buyers that require extensive third-party integrations (Slack/Teams depth, calendar/email workflows, HRIS connectors). Some competing vendors provide broader integration catalogs. Source for integration requests: - Product listing and user reviews on a major review site Competitive comparison content (example third-party aggregator): - An industry comparison site compares ClearCompany vs OneAdvanced Performance & Talent using review-site sentiment aggregation; methodology depends on their model and should be treated as directional. Source: - Third-party comparison article on an industry comparison site

	Clear Review / OneAdvanced Performance & Talent	Lattice	15Five
Starting Price	Vendor-published starter pricing noted on a review site	Typically quote-based (often per-employee/month)	Typically quote-based (often per-employee/month)
Best Fit	UK/EU organizations (including public sector) seeking continuous performance management and alignment with OneAdvanced ecosystem	Product-focused HR teams seeking modern UX and broad people ops integrations	Teams emphasizing manager effectiveness, engagement, and continuous performance
Key Strength	Consistent emphasis on continuous conversations; SSO options listed; presence in public procurement channels	Broad ecosystem and integrations; market perception of modern UX	Manager coaching and engagement tooling (market perception)
Key Weakness	Security/compliance details not clearly public for this specific product; some integration gaps noted (Outlook)	May be costly at scale; modular pricing can increase total cost	May be costly; feature set may exceed needs for smaller teams

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

Where Clear Review may be a pragmatic choice:

Buyers operating within UK public sector procurement frameworks (G-Cloud) or those that prioritize alignment with OneAdvanced portfolio capabilities.
Organizations that prefer an approach oriented to continuous performance conversations and that value public procurement availability.

Sources:

Public procurement listing on G-Cloud digital marketplace
Vendor announcement / acquisition overview page

Where alternatives may be stronger:

Organizations that require clearly published, product-specific security documentation (SOC 2/ISO attestations, subprocessor lists, detailed technical security pages). Many HR tech vendors publish detailed trust center pages; a Clear Review-specific public trust page was not obvious in this research.
Buyers that require extensive third-party integrations (Slack/Teams depth, calendar/email workflows, HRIS connectors). Some competing vendors provide broader integration catalogs.

Source for integration requests:

Product listing and user reviews on a major review site

Competitive comparison content (example third-party aggregator):

An industry comparison site compares ClearCompany vs OneAdvanced Performance & Talent using review-site sentiment aggregation; methodology depends on their model and should be treated as directional.

Source:

Third-party comparison article on an industry comparison site

	Clear Review / OneAdvanced Performance & Talent	Lattice	15Five
Starting Price	Vendor-published starter pricing noted on a review site	Typically quote-based (often per-employee/month)	Typically quote-based (often per-employee/month)
Best Fit	UK/EU organizations (including public sector) seeking continuous performance management and alignment with OneAdvanced ecosystem	Product-focused HR teams seeking modern UX and broad people ops integrations	Teams emphasizing manager effectiveness, engagement, and continuous performance
Key Strength	Consistent emphasis on continuous conversations; SSO options listed; presence in public procurement channels	Broad ecosystem and integrations; market perception of modern UX	Manager coaching and engagement tooling (market perception)
Key Weakness	Security/compliance details not clearly public for this specific product; some integration gaps noted (Outlook)	May be costly at scale; modular pricing can increase total cost	May be costly; feature set may exceed needs for smaller teams