CloudSense

Name: CloudSense
Brand: CloudSense
Rating: 4.2 (175 reviews)

AI-powered CPQ for telcos. Built on Salesforce. Part of the TelcoDR portfolio.

Est 2009|Valuation $36.1M|Raised $108.4M|45 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 16K|Website|FTEs 54|HQ London, England, GB

MarketsDynamic Pricing & Subscription Management CPQ Software (Configure, Price, Quote)Subscription Management & Recurring Billing

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis: where alternatives may excel

- **Salesforce Revenue Cloud / CPQ** can be preferable where an organization wants a single-vendor Salesforce stack, predictable alignment with Salesforce roadmap, and a larger talent/partner ecosystem. Public list pricing for some CPQ tiers can simplify early-stage budgeting, though final pricing is often negotiated. (official vendor pricing documentation) - **Configure One Cloud** appears (via user-scored comparisons) to score higher on some support and pricing-flexibility metrics, which may matter if support responsiveness and pricing agility are key criteria. (user review and comparison sites) - **Oracle CPQ** may be a better fit where the enterprise is standardized on Oracle CX/ERP and prefers quote-to-cash integrated into the Oracle ecosystem. (official vendor documentation)

Market share/adoption trend caveat

Market-share pages based on web signals provide directional estimates only and should not be treated as authoritative procurement-grade market share. (web-signal market intelligence and vendor analysis)

	CloudSense	Salesforce Revenue Cloud / Salesforce CPQ	PROS Smart CPQ
Starting Price	Not publicly listed; typically “contact for pricing” (industry tech stack report)	Public list pricing exists for some CPQ tiers; often annual contract (official vendor pricing pages)	Pricing information available via vendor; actual costs depend on negotiated quotes (vendor pricing overview)
Best For	Telecom/media providers needing Salesforce-based CPQ + order/subscriber management (vendor blog announcement)	Organizations standardizing on Salesforce wanting integrated Revenue Cloud capabilities (official vendor product pages)	Companies prioritizing sophisticated pricing and CPQ workflows; stronger focus on pricing optimization (vendor product pages)
Key Strength	Industry focus (telecom/media), Salesforce-based design; references to large telco customers (vendor blog announcement)	Ecosystem scale, first-party integration with Salesforce, larger partner/talent pool (official vendor product pages)	Pricing and configuration capabilities with heritage in pricing science (vendor product pages)
Key Weakness	Public pricing/security details limited; reliance on vendor collateral; documented DNS incident (official support advisory)	Complexity/implementation burden; can be costly; operational complexity with some newer components (community signals)	May require more integration work to align closely with Salesforce CRM workflows depending on architecture (confirm with vendor)

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis: where alternatives may excel

Salesforce Revenue Cloud / CPQ can be preferable where an organization wants a single-vendor Salesforce stack, predictable alignment with Salesforce roadmap, and a larger talent/partner ecosystem. Public list pricing for some CPQ tiers can simplify early-stage budgeting, though final pricing is often negotiated. (official vendor pricing documentation)
Configure One Cloud appears (via user-scored comparisons) to score higher on some support and pricing-flexibility metrics, which may matter if support responsiveness and pricing agility are key criteria. (user review and comparison sites)
Oracle CPQ may be a better fit where the enterprise is standardized on Oracle CX/ERP and prefers quote-to-cash integrated into the Oracle ecosystem. (official vendor documentation)

Market share/adoption trend caveat

Market-share pages based on web signals provide directional estimates only and should not be treated as authoritative procurement-grade market share. (web-signal market intelligence and vendor analysis)

	CloudSense	Salesforce Revenue Cloud / Salesforce CPQ	PROS Smart CPQ
Starting Price	Not publicly listed; typically “contact for pricing” (industry tech stack report)	Public list pricing exists for some CPQ tiers; often annual contract (official vendor pricing pages)	Pricing information available via vendor; actual costs depend on negotiated quotes (vendor pricing overview)
Best For	Telecom/media providers needing Salesforce-based CPQ + order/subscriber management (vendor blog announcement)	Organizations standardizing on Salesforce wanting integrated Revenue Cloud capabilities (official vendor product pages)	Companies prioritizing sophisticated pricing and CPQ workflows; stronger focus on pricing optimization (vendor product pages)
Key Strength	Industry focus (telecom/media), Salesforce-based design; references to large telco customers (vendor blog announcement)	Ecosystem scale, first-party integration with Salesforce, larger partner/talent pool (official vendor product pages)	Pricing and configuration capabilities with heritage in pricing science (vendor product pages)
Key Weakness	Public pricing/security details limited; reliance on vendor collateral; documented DNS incident (official support advisory)	Complexity/implementation burden; can be costly; operational complexity with some newer components (community signals)	May require more integration work to align closely with Salesforce CRM workflows depending on architecture (confirm with vendor)