Dust

Name: Dust
Brand: Dust
Rating: 4.9 (23 reviews)

AI Native

Transform how work gets done. Just use Dust.

Est 2023|Valuation $98.8M|Raised $61.6M|42 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 42K|Web traffic 455K|FTEs 143|HQ Paris, Île-de-France, FR

MarketsAI Assistant Agent Builder Platforms

01Competitive Landscape

| Aspect | Dust | Glean | Moveworks | |--------|------|-------|-----------| | Starting Price | Pro is per-seat; exact list price not consistently public; third parties estimate ~US$29/user/month (verify) | Pricing typically sales-led/enterprise; public pricing is not straightforward | Pricing is custom quote / enterprise | | Best For | Teams wanting a shared agent-building workspace tightly connected to internal tools, with model flexibility and agent reuse | Orgs prioritizing enterprise search relevance across many systems + assistant on top | Large enterprises automating IT/HR workflows with a mature integration ecosystem | | Key Strength | Custom agents + shareable configs; programmatic API and credits model; SOC 2 Type II and GDPR claims | Search relevance and enterprise “knowledge graph” style positioning (market perception) | Workflow automation at enterprise scale with strong ITSM/HR use cases | | Key Weakness | Limited public review depth; unclear breadth of enterprise admin/governance features from public materials; performance complaints exist | Often expensive and sales-led; can be heavy to roll out and administer (industry commentary, not fully evidenced here) | Usually expensive, sales-led, and may require substantial services/implementation | - Competitor notes (evidence-backed where possible) - Moveworks does not publish prices and pushes “get a custom quote.” ([moveworks.com](https://www.moveworks.com/us/en/pricing?utm_source=openai)) - Glean pricing information is fragmented and often inferred; reliable “official” pricing is typically not posted openly (many third-party estimates exist, but they vary widely). One must treat third-party pricing posts with caution. - Where alternatives may excel - Glean - Often perceived as stronger for “enterprise search” breadth and mature relevance tuning at scale (based on market positioning; not fully validated in the sources captured here). - Moveworks - Often positioned for enterprise workflow automation and IT/HR ticket deflection/fulfillment, especially in large ITSM environments. ([en.wikipedia.org](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moveworks?utm_source=openai)) - Where Dust may excel - Buyers wanting a more “builder + deploy” agent platform vs. a single assistant, with a strong emphasis on connecting company data sources and enabling teams to create many agents. ([gartner.com](https://www.gartner.com/reviews/product/dust-363291154?utm_source=openai))

01Competitive Landscape

Aspect	Dust	Glean	Moveworks
Starting Price	Pro is per-seat; exact list price not consistently public; third parties estimate ~US$29/user/month (verify)	Pricing typically sales-led/enterprise; public pricing is not straightforward	Pricing is custom quote / enterprise
Best For	Teams wanting a shared agent-building workspace tightly connected to internal tools, with model flexibility and agent reuse	Orgs prioritizing enterprise search relevance across many systems + assistant on top	Large enterprises automating IT/HR workflows with a mature integration ecosystem
Key Strength	Custom agents + shareable configs; programmatic API and credits model; SOC 2 Type II and GDPR claims	Search relevance and enterprise “knowledge graph” style positioning (market perception)	Workflow automation at enterprise scale with strong ITSM/HR use cases
Key Weakness	Limited public review depth; unclear breadth of enterprise admin/governance features from public materials; performance complaints exist	Often expensive and sales-led; can be heavy to roll out and administer (industry commentary, not fully evidenced here)	Usually expensive, sales-led, and may require substantial services/implementation

Competitor notes (evidence-backed where possible)
- Moveworks does not publish prices and pushes “get a custom quote.” (moveworks.com)
- Glean pricing information is fragmented and often inferred; reliable “official” pricing is typically not posted openly (many third-party estimates exist, but they vary widely). One must treat third-party pricing posts with caution.
Where alternatives may excel
- Glean
  - Often perceived as stronger for “enterprise search” breadth and mature relevance tuning at scale (based on market positioning; not fully validated in the sources captured here).
- Moveworks
  - Often positioned for enterprise workflow automation and IT/HR ticket deflection/fulfillment, especially in large ITSM environments. (en.wikipedia.org)
Where Dust may excel
- Buyers wanting a more “builder + deploy” agent platform vs. a single assistant, with a strong emphasis on connecting company data sources and enabling teams to create many agents. (gartner.com)

Aspect

Dust

Glean

Moveworks

Starting Price

Pro is per-seat; exact list price not consistently public; third parties estimate ~US$29/user/month (verify)

Pricing typically sales-led/enterprise; public pricing is not straightforward

Pricing is custom quote / enterprise

Best For

Teams wanting a shared agent-building workspace tightly connected to internal tools, with model flexibility and agent reuse

Orgs prioritizing enterprise search relevance across many systems + assistant on top

Large enterprises automating IT/HR workflows with a mature integration ecosystem

Key Strength

Custom agents + shareable configs; programmatic API and credits model; SOC 2 Type II and GDPR claims

Search relevance and enterprise “knowledge graph” style positioning (market perception)

Workflow automation at enterprise scale with strong ITSM/HR use cases

Key Weakness

Limited public review depth; unclear breadth of enterprise admin/governance features from public materials; performance complaints exist

Often expensive and sales-led; can be heavy to roll out and administer (industry commentary, not fully evidenced here)

Usually expensive, sales-led, and may require substantial services/implementation