Workspace
    • Briefing
    • Ask Airframe
    Transformation
    • Audit
    Your Stack
    • Registry
    • Finance
    • Context
    Discover
    Powered by Airframe
    1. Research
    2. /
    3. Products
    4. /
    5. Exabeam
    Exabeam

    Exabeam

    Better Security. Faster Results.

    Est 2003|Valuation $247.7M|Raised $706.6M|69 Ref Customers
    LinkedIn 52K|Web traffic 79K|FTEs 782|HQ Broomfield, Colorado, US
    MarketsSecurity Information and Event Management (SIEM)Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR)
    Platform CoversThreat Intelligence PlatformsBoard Reporting for Cyber Risk
    Exabeam screenshot
    FirmCompareTractionAnalysisAdvocates

    Insights

    All insightsAccountingFinanceSoftwareCustomer experience

    Benchmarks

    The Software LeaderboardMethodology

    Tools & data

    Market ExplorerStudioRegistry

    Company

    AboutCareers

    Legal

    Privacy PolicyTerms of Service

    © 2026 Airframe, Inc. All rights reserved.

      Published Oct 15, 2026

      01Common complaints

      1. All-in on Microsoft security stack (Defender/M365/Azure): Microsoft Sentinel may provide more seamless native integrations and purchasing simplicity in Microsoft-centric environments. 2. SOC workflows that rely heavily on ad-hoc threat hunting with complex, analyst-driven queries: Competitors with highly-regarded query ergonomics (such as Splunk or Sentinel) may be preferable. 3. Requirement for transparent, predictable, self-serve pricing: Exabeam is typically quote-based and may be less suitable where transparent consumption pricing is required. 4. Log sources are highly custom and parser quality is a primary risk: Consider solutions that align with in-house engineering capacity (for example Elastic) or vendors with demonstrably robust out-of-the-box normalization for the specific stack. 5. Sensitivity to roadmap and integration changes post-merger: Validate roadmap commitments, migration plans, and SLAs for product-line stability.

      Deal disqualifiers (poor fit indicators)

      • Very small teams without capacity to operationalize UEBA and tuning
      • Organizations that require fully transparent online self-serve pricing
      • Environments where query/search ergonomics are a critical differentiator and any friction would be unacceptable

      Issues surfaced in reviews / summaries

      • Cloud search usability has been identified in reviews as an area for improvement.
      • Parsing and normalization quality has been reported as inconsistent for some log sources.
      • Occasional downtime or processing delays have been reported by some users, particularly at large ingestion volumes.

      Vendor-acknowledged limitations / roadmap signals

      Release notes and public updates show ongoing feature additions (for example, dashboard and compliance feature updates). Detailed roadmap timelines are not generally public; enterprise buyers should request roadmap details under NDA.

      Security/compliance gaps

      Exabeam publishes SOC 2 Type II and ISO certifications publicly. If specific authorizations or contractual terms are required (for example FedRAMP authorization, HIPAA BAA, customer-managed keys, or strict country residency guarantees), buyers should validate contractual availability and technical implementation.

      02Why they buy

      Unique selling points supported by available evidence

      - Emphasis on behavioral analytics (UEBA): Product messaging and multiple reviews highlight UEBA and insider-threat detection capabilities. - Dual delivery model: Availability of a cloud-native platform and an on-prem SIEM option (via LogRhythm SIEM) supports regulated and data-sovereignty-driven customers. - Industry recognition claims: Vendor materials reference inclusion in analyst research such as the Gartner Magic Quadrant; buyers should verify analyst findings directly.

      Where competitors have clearer advantages

      • Pricing transparency: Competitors such as Microsoft Sentinel provide more explicit public pricing constructs.
      • Search/hunting ergonomics: Alternatives such as Splunk are commonly described as flexible for search and investigation workflows, though at potentially higher cost.

      03Field reports

      Review platform signals (G2)

      • Exabeam is well rated on G2 across profiles that include both LogRhythm SIEM and Exabeam New-Scale Fusion.

      A representative review described strong UEBA capabilities, a broad set of SIEM rules, and straightforward integrations; the same review also noted cloud search and parsing usability issues. This pattern aligns with common themes across SIEM vendors: detection and analytics strengths paired with friction in search/query UX and parsing normalization.

      Gartner Peer Insights (vendor-reported)

      Vendor communications have highlighted inclusion in Gartner Peer Insights recognition programs and historical customer ratings. Buyers should verify the most current ratings directly on the platform.

      Community/social perspectives (Reddit/HN)

      Press coverage referenced community discussion about organizational changes; these discussions are not product reviews but indicate that organizational stability can be a procurement consideration. Interpretation: Organizational changes such as layoffs or reorganization can affect support and roadmap continuity. Procurement teams should validate: - Support SLAs and escalation paths - Product roadmap clarity post-merger - Availability of dedicated technical account management or customer success resources

      Common outcomes customers cite

      From vendor case quotes and review snippets, customers frequently report:

      • Reduced investigation time and improved context via timeline/attack-chain views
      • Improved detection of insider-threat or credential-compromise behaviors via UEBA
      • Faster onboarding of log sources (claimed in vendor materials; review excerpts are mixed on parser quality)

      Vendor-published outcomes and methodology caveats

      The vendor publishes commissioned studies and customer-reported ROI metrics. Commissioned studies can be directionally useful but often lack full methodology transparency and may reflect selection bias (respondents are frequently customers). ROI and cost/value claims should be treated as hypotheses and validated using organization-specific ingestion/retention and staffing models.

      Example customer quote (vendor site)

      A customer statement on a vendor page reported that Exabeam reduced the time required to resolve log-related tasks from months to hours and that the customer continued to use the product after deployment. This testimonial is not independently verified; procurement teams should request specific before/after metrics (for example, MTTD/MTTR), scope of log sources, and staffing context.

      Independent product evaluation (older)

      An independent product test evaluated an earlier Exabeam platform and included pricing and functionality observations. That evaluation is dated relative to the New-Scale platform and the 2024 merger and should be considered historical background rather than definitive current-state validation.

      04Best fit

      Company size

      • Typical fit: 500–50,000+ employees (mid-market to enterprise), especially organizations with dedicated SOC operations.
      • Budget reality: SIEM programs commonly require six-figure annual spend once ingestion, retention, and staffing are included.

      Industries / verticals

      Commonly appropriate in regulated or high-risk sectors, including financial services, healthcare, government/defense, critical infrastructure, airlines/transportation, and large SaaS/technology companies.

      Roles and personas

      • Decision makers: CISO, VP Security, SOC Director, Head of Detection & Response.
      • Users: SOC analysts, detection engineers, incident responders, and security platform engineers.

      Pain points Exabeam addresses

      • High alert volumes and low signal-to-noise in rule-based SIEM systems
      • Detection of compromised credentials and insider-threat behaviors
      • Reducing investigation time through event correlation and timeline views

      05The pitch

      What the product does (core value proposition)

      Exabeam is a security operations platform focused on SIEM and UEBA (user and entity behavior analytics) with increasing emphasis on TDIR (Threat Detection, Investigation & Response) and automation/"agentic AI" workflows. In practice, Exabeam operates in two primary modes: - Cloud-native SIEM / security operations platform (New-Scale platform / New-Scale Fusion) for ingesting and analyzing log data at scale with behavioral analytics. - Self-hosted SIEM platform (LogRhythm SIEM platform, post-merger) for customers that must maintain SIEM operations on-premises. Exabeam documentation describes functionality for detection, UEBA, and SOAR, producing correlated context and attack-chain views from logs collected either via a SIEM or direct ingestion (e.g., syslog), and surfacing analyst-focused investigation context.

      Target market and market positioning

      • Target market: Mid-market to large enterprise security teams (SOC, incident response, security engineering), plus regulated industries that require compliance reporting and audit evidence.
      • Positioning: Marketed as a modern SIEM with emphasis on UEBA and investigation timelines to reduce alert fatigue and speed investigations. Following the 2024 merger, the vendor presents a consolidated SecOps portfolio offering both cloud-native and on-prem SIEM options.

      Get a comprehensive analysis of Exabeam including market position, competitive landscape, adoption trends, and peer benchmarks.

      Download full report →
      1. All-in on Microsoft security stack (Defender/M365/Azure): Microsoft Sentinel may provide more seamless native integrations and purchasing simplicity in Microsoft-centric environments.
      2. SOC workflows that rely heavily on ad-hoc threat hunting with complex, analyst-driven queries: Competitors with highly-regarded query ergonomics (such as Splunk or Sentinel) may be preferable.
      3. Requirement for transparent, predictable, self-serve pricing: Exabeam is typically quote-based and may be less suitable where transparent consumption pricing is required.
      4. Log sources are highly custom and parser quality is a primary risk: Consider solutions that align with in-house engineering capacity (for example Elastic) or vendors with demonstrably robust out-of-the-box normalization for the specific stack.
      5. Sensitivity to roadmap and integration changes post-merger: Validate roadmap commitments, migration plans, and SLAs for product-line stability.
      • Emphasis on behavioral analytics (UEBA): Product messaging and multiple reviews highlight UEBA and insider-threat detection capabilities.
      • Dual delivery model: Availability of a cloud-native platform and an on-prem SIEM option (via LogRhythm SIEM) supports regulated and data-sovereignty-driven customers.
      • Industry recognition claims: Vendor materials reference inclusion in analyst research such as the Gartner Magic Quadrant; buyers should verify analyst findings directly.

      Press coverage referenced community discussion about organizational changes; these discussions are not product reviews but indicate that organizational stability can be a procurement consideration.

      Interpretation: Organizational changes such as layoffs or reorganization can affect support and roadmap continuity. Procurement teams should validate:

      • Support SLAs and escalation paths
      • Product roadmap clarity post-merger
      • Availability of dedicated technical account management or customer success resources

      Exabeam is a security operations platform focused on SIEM and UEBA (user and entity behavior analytics) with increasing emphasis on TDIR (Threat Detection, Investigation & Response) and automation/"agentic AI" workflows. In practice, Exabeam operates in two primary modes:

      • Cloud-native SIEM / security operations platform (New-Scale platform / New-Scale Fusion) for ingesting and analyzing log data at scale with behavioral analytics.
      • Self-hosted SIEM platform (LogRhythm SIEM platform, post-merger) for customers that must maintain SIEM operations on-premises.

      Exabeam documentation describes functionality for detection, UEBA, and SOAR, producing correlated context and attack-chain views from logs collected either via a SIEM or direct ingestion (e.g., syslog), and surfacing analyst-focused investigation context.