Exabeam

Name: Exabeam
Brand: Exabeam
Rating: 4.3 (1057 reviews)

Better Security. Faster Results.

Est 2003|Valuation $247.7M|Raised $706.6M|69 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 52K|Web traffic 79K|FTEs 782|HQ Broomfield, Colorado, US

MarketsSecurity Information and Event Management (SIEM)Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR)

Platform CoversThreat Intelligence Platforms Board Reporting for Cyber Risk

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Where the product is commonly selected: - Teams that value behavioral analytics and investigation workflows. - Organizations seeking an option that supports both cloud-native deployments and on-prem SIEM, particularly for regulatory or sovereignty requirements. Where competitors often excel: - Microsoft Sentinel: Strong fit for Microsoft-centric environments with deep native integrations and public consumption pricing constructs. - Splunk Enterprise Security: Often selected for flexible search and investigation at scale; historically perceived as flexible but potentially higher cost at large ingestion volumes. - IBM QRadar: Long enterprise lineage; buyers should evaluate strategic product direction in the context of industry consolidation. Adoption and market trend notes: - The SIEM market has experienced consolidation and vendor portfolio shifts. Buyers should consider roadmap clarity and integration plans when selecting a provider.

	Exabeam	Microsoft Sentinel	IBM QRadar SIEM
Starting Price	Quote-based; historical public reference (dated) indicates high-entry enterprise pricing; users report user/GB/day models	Public pricing; consumption-based with analytics/data lake tiers and commitment options	Quote-based; pricing typically based on entity counts or workload; vendor messaging varies by package
Typical Fit	Organizations prioritizing UEBA-driven investigation workflows and those requiring cloud-native SIEM with an on-prem option	Organizations standardized on Microsoft security tooling (Azure/M365/Defender) seeking integrated SecOps and flexible ingestion tiers	Enterprises aligned to IBM ecosystem and QRadar suite/SOAR integration; buyers should confirm product direction and packaging
Key Strength	Behavioral analytics (UEBA) and investigator-focused workflows; availability of both cloud-native and on-prem deployment paths	Integration with Microsoft security stack and broad connector ecosystem; clear consumption pricing constructs	Mature SIEM history and established enterprise presence; integration with IBM security offerings
Key Weakness	Review excerpts indicate search/query ergonomics and parser robustness can require improvement; pricing visibility is limited	Consumption costs can grow with ingestion and are most cost-effective within Azure-centric environments	Product transition complexity and procurement implications warrant scrutiny

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Where the product is commonly selected:

Teams that value behavioral analytics and investigation workflows.
Organizations seeking an option that supports both cloud-native deployments and on-prem SIEM, particularly for regulatory or sovereignty requirements.

Where competitors often excel:

Microsoft Sentinel: Strong fit for Microsoft-centric environments with deep native integrations and public consumption pricing constructs.
Splunk Enterprise Security: Often selected for flexible search and investigation at scale; historically perceived as flexible but potentially higher cost at large ingestion volumes.
IBM QRadar: Long enterprise lineage; buyers should evaluate strategic product direction in the context of industry consolidation.

Adoption and market trend notes:

The SIEM market has experienced consolidation and vendor portfolio shifts. Buyers should consider roadmap clarity and integration plans when selecting a provider.

	Exabeam	Microsoft Sentinel	IBM QRadar SIEM
Starting Price	Quote-based; historical public reference (dated) indicates high-entry enterprise pricing; users report user/GB/day models	Public pricing; consumption-based with analytics/data lake tiers and commitment options	Quote-based; pricing typically based on entity counts or workload; vendor messaging varies by package
Typical Fit	Organizations prioritizing UEBA-driven investigation workflows and those requiring cloud-native SIEM with an on-prem option	Organizations standardized on Microsoft security tooling (Azure/M365/Defender) seeking integrated SecOps and flexible ingestion tiers	Enterprises aligned to IBM ecosystem and QRadar suite/SOAR integration; buyers should confirm product direction and packaging
Key Strength	Behavioral analytics (UEBA) and investigator-focused workflows; availability of both cloud-native and on-prem deployment paths	Integration with Microsoft security stack and broad connector ecosystem; clear consumption pricing constructs	Mature SIEM history and established enterprise presence; integration with IBM security offerings
Key Weakness	Review excerpts indicate search/query ergonomics and parser robustness can require improvement; pricing visibility is limited	Consumption costs can grow with ingestion and are most cost-effective within Azure-centric environments	Product transition complexity and procurement implications warrant scrutiny