Workspace
    • Briefing
    • Ask Airframe
    Transformation
    • Audit
    Your Stack
    • Registry
    • Finance
    • Context
    Discover
    Powered by Airframe
    1. Research
    2. /
    3. Products
    4. /
    5. Signals
    Signals

    Signals

    Pronounced: uh-tahn-um

    Est 2018|27 Ref Customers
    LinkedIn 9K|Web traffic 2K|FTEs 132|HQ Provo, Utah, US
    MarketsInbound Lead EngagementConversational Marketing
    Signals screenshot
    FirmCompareTractionAnalysisAdvocates

    Insights

    All insightsAccountingFinanceSoftwareCustomer experience

    Benchmarks

    The Software LeaderboardMethodology

    Tools & data

    Market ExplorerStudioRegistry

    Company

    AboutCareers

    Legal

    Privacy PolicyTerms of Service

    © 2026 Airframe, Inc. All rights reserved.

      Published Oct 15, 2026

      01Competitive Landscape

      | Aspect | Signals (getsignals.ai) | 6sense | Warmly | |--------|--------------------------|--------|--------| | Starting Price | Metered line items; example: Integrations — published per-item pricing available from the vendor, Knowledge Base — published per-item pricing available from the vendor, Voice Minutes — published per-minute pricing available from the vendor | Custom / typically enterprise pricing | Pricing not confirmed in sources reviewed (generally demo-led) | | Best For | Teams seeking multi-channel AI agents to handle lead response, support, front desk, recruiting | Enterprise ABM/GTM intelligence + orchestration across marketing and sales | Real-time signals and routing/engagement, with emphasis on person-level signals | | Key Strength | Multi-channel execution as a core product theme; documentation shows operational modules (ICP, contacts, reporting, integrations) | Large-scale intent data network + predictive models; broad activation layer | Real-time, unified signals; person-level context; emphasis on immediate actionability | | Key Weakness | Limited third-party review visibility; unclear public security attestations; contract terms may be restrictive | High cost; reported implementation complexity; potential noise in intent signals | Requires buyer validation for identification rates, coverage, and workflow fit | - Direct competitors and their key differentiators - 6sense - Differentiation: large-scale intent data network and enterprise GTM intelligence/orchestration. - Common criticisms in community discussions include high cost, implementation complexity, and some reports of noisy intent signals. - Warmly - Differentiation: focus on real-time signals and person-level identification, combined with routing and orchestration features. - Leadfeeder/Dealfront - Differentiation: established visitor identification and company intelligence derived from public sources. - Feature comparison: where Signals likely excels vs lag behind - Likely excels - Cross-channel execution (voice + email + chat + SMS) presented as a core capability - Vendor-provided agent templates may reduce initial design effort compared with building agents from scratch - Potentially lags - Independent validation of outcomes and model quality due to limited neutral reviews - Enterprise procurement readiness if security attestations are not readily available - Breadth and maturity of intent data compared with specialist providers such as 6sense - Pricing comparison: value proposition vs alternatives - Signals - Metered usage can be cost-effective for smaller deployments but may become expensive as multiple channels and knowledge bases scale. - Annual prepayment default (per Terms) may be a barrier for some buyers. - 6sense - Typically involves higher annual contract value and longer implementation timelines. - Warmly / Leadfeeder - Often positioned as more focused signal or identification products that may be easier to adopt for specific use cases. - Market share and adoption trends - Not established from robust third-party analyst sources within the scope of this research.
      AspectSignals (getsignals.ai)6senseWarmly
      Starting PriceMetered line items; example: Integrations — published per-item pricing available from the vendor, Knowledge Base — published per-item pricing available from the vendor, Voice Minutes — published per-minute pricing available from the vendorCustom / typically enterprise pricingPricing not confirmed in sources reviewed (generally demo-led)
      Best ForTeams seeking multi-channel AI agents to handle lead response, support, front desk, recruitingEnterprise ABM/GTM intelligence + orchestration across marketing and salesReal-time signals and routing/engagement, with emphasis on person-level signals
      Key StrengthMulti-channel execution as a core product theme; documentation shows operational modules (ICP, contacts, reporting, integrations)Large-scale intent data network + predictive models; broad activation layerReal-time, unified signals; person-level context; emphasis on immediate actionability
      Key WeaknessLimited third-party review visibility; unclear public security attestations; contract terms may be restrictiveHigh cost; reported implementation complexity; potential noise in intent signalsRequires buyer validation for identification rates, coverage, and workflow fit
      • Direct competitors and their key differentiators

        • 6sense
          • Differentiation: large-scale intent data network and enterprise GTM intelligence/orchestration.
          • Common criticisms in community discussions include high cost, implementation complexity, and some reports of noisy intent signals.
        • Warmly
          • Differentiation: focus on real-time signals and person-level identification, combined with routing and orchestration features.
        • Leadfeeder/Dealfront
          • Differentiation: established visitor identification and company intelligence derived from public sources.
      • Feature comparison: where Signals likely excels vs lag behind

        • Likely excels
          • Cross-channel execution (voice + email + chat + SMS) presented as a core capability
          • Vendor-provided agent templates may reduce initial design effort compared with building agents from scratch
        • Potentially lags
          • Independent validation of outcomes and model quality due to limited neutral reviews
          • Enterprise procurement readiness if security attestations are not readily available
          • Breadth and maturity of intent data compared with specialist providers such as 6sense
      • Pricing comparison: value proposition vs alternatives

        • Signals
          • Metered usage can be cost-effective for smaller deployments but may become expensive as multiple channels and knowledge bases scale.
          • Annual prepayment default (per Terms) may be a barrier for some buyers.
        • 6sense
          • Typically involves higher annual contract value and longer implementation timelines.
        • Warmly / Leadfeeder
          • Often positioned as more focused signal or identification products that may be easier to adopt for specific use cases.
      • Market share and adoption trends

        • Not established from robust third-party analyst sources within the scope of this research.