Dropbox Reclaim

Name: Dropbox Reclaim
Brand: Reclaim.ai
Rating: 4.6 (157 reviews)

AI scheduling for a perfect workweek.

Est 2019|Valuation $40.2M|Raised $9.5M|93 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 5K|Web traffic 601K|FTEs 16|HQ Portland, Oregon, US

MarketsExecutive Productivity & Scheduling

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Reclaim vs Calendly - Calendly focuses on external meeting booking infrastructure (event types, booking pages, routing, and payments). - Reclaim overlaps via scheduling links but differentiates by connecting scheduling decisions to focus-time rules and automated rescheduling of lower-priority items. - If the primary requirement is external booking, routing, and a mature mobile experience, Calendly may be the simpler option. Reclaim vs Motion - Motion provides a unified workspace for tasks, docs, and calendar, including native mobile apps. - Reclaim focuses on integrating with existing task and calendar tools rather than replacing project management workflows. Vendor materials present Reclaim as less disruptive and lower cost, which should be validated by buyers against actual workflow needs. Reclaim vs Clockwise - Vendor materials claim real-time rescheduling and task integrations; buyers should independently compare how focus time is created and enforced, Outlook support, and administrative controls.

Market share and adoption trends

Published adoption numbers have increased in vendor and press materials over time, but these figures are not independently audited.
Dropbox ownership may enable broader distribution; specific integration roadmaps were not validated beyond acquisition announcements in the reviewed sources.

	Reclaim (reclaim.ai)	Calendly	Motion
Starting Price	Free plan available; paid tiers use a per-seat monthly model with an entry-level tier for individuals/small teams and higher tiers for larger teams	Free plan available; paid per-seat tiers for standard external scheduling	Paid per-seat tiers with higher-priced plans for AI-assisted planning and pro features
Primary Use Case	Calendar-focused time blocking, focus protection, cross-account sync, task-to-calendar blocks	External meeting booking, event types, routing, and public booking pages	Task-first planning and consolidated workspace combining tasks/projects and calendar
Key Strength	Priority-based calendar automation and cross-account calendar sync; team analytics capabilities	Mature booking flows, routing, and widespread adoption for external scheduling	Consolidated workspace and native mobile/desktop apps with integrated task management
Key Weakness	No native mobile apps; potential sync/duplication confusion; iCloud limitations	Not designed primarily for protecting internal focus blocks or task-to-calendar automation	Higher cost and higher adoption lift if migrating work into the vendor's endpoint

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Reclaim vs Calendly

Calendly focuses on external meeting booking infrastructure (event types, booking pages, routing, and payments).
Reclaim overlaps via scheduling links but differentiates by connecting scheduling decisions to focus-time rules and automated rescheduling of lower-priority items.
If the primary requirement is external booking, routing, and a mature mobile experience, Calendly may be the simpler option.

Reclaim vs Motion

Motion provides a unified workspace for tasks, docs, and calendar, including native mobile apps.
Reclaim focuses on integrating with existing task and calendar tools rather than replacing project management workflows. Vendor materials present Reclaim as less disruptive and lower cost, which should be validated by buyers against actual workflow needs.

Reclaim vs Clockwise

Vendor materials claim real-time rescheduling and task integrations; buyers should independently compare how focus time is created and enforced, Outlook support, and administrative controls.

Market share and adoption trends

Published adoption numbers have increased in vendor and press materials over time, but these figures are not independently audited.
Dropbox ownership may enable broader distribution; specific integration roadmaps were not validated beyond acquisition announcements in the reviewed sources.

	Reclaim (reclaim.ai)	Calendly	Motion
Starting Price	Free plan available; paid tiers use a per-seat monthly model with an entry-level tier for individuals/small teams and higher tiers for larger teams	Free plan available; paid per-seat tiers for standard external scheduling	Paid per-seat tiers with higher-priced plans for AI-assisted planning and pro features
Primary Use Case	Calendar-focused time blocking, focus protection, cross-account sync, task-to-calendar blocks	External meeting booking, event types, routing, and public booking pages	Task-first planning and consolidated workspace combining tasks/projects and calendar
Key Strength	Priority-based calendar automation and cross-account calendar sync; team analytics capabilities	Mature booking flows, routing, and widespread adoption for external scheduling	Consolidated workspace and native mobile/desktop apps with integrated task management
Key Weakness	No native mobile apps; potential sync/duplication confusion; iCloud limitations	Not designed primarily for protecting internal focus blocks or task-to-calendar automation	Higher cost and higher adoption lift if migrating work into the vendor's endpoint