Reclaim Security
AI NativeRegain Control. Rebuild Trust. Reclaim Security.
Regain Control. Rebuild Trust. Reclaim Security.
Published Oct 6, 2026
The vendor states it is working toward ISO 27001 certification; no public target date was identified.
No credible public churn narratives or consistent cancellation reasons were found.
Based on vendor messaging and the limited independent review data, reasons cited for selecting Reclaim Security include reducing manual remediation effort, shortening remediation time, avoiding operational disruption through impact prediction and simulation, and unifying remediation workflows across multiple security tools.
Gartner Peer Insights shows very limited review volume for this vendor: an isolated review indicating a very high rating. The review cites a “design partnership” engagement and reports positive outcomes; however, a solitary entry is insufficient to generalize about support quality or product reliability.
Public community discussion mentioning reclaim.security was limited and primarily consisted of posts about corporate developments rather than operational feedback or detailed product reviews.
No substantive review presence on TrustRadius or G2 was identified for reclaim.security in publicly accessible searches; this is common for early-stage enterprise security vendors.
Vendor blog posts include illustrative examples (for example, an enterprise-sized “Global Financial Services” scenario with claimed revenue impact). These appear to be illustrative and not independently verifiable. Attribution of revenue or broad business metrics to a remediation tool should be treated with caution unless corroborated.
Based on vendor positioning and market materials, a likely ICP includes mid-market to enterprise organizations that have multiple security controls and a remediation backlog.
Vendor materials and testimonials indicate focus on cybersecurity/technology companies, telecom/IoT, and large operational organizations such as financial services.
Typical buyer personas include:
Reclaim Security is marketed toward mid-market and enterprise security organizations that manage complex toolchains (e.g., M365 / Entra ID, endpoint, email security, cloud). Typical target use cases referenced by the vendor and public materials include teams experiencing high alert volume and remediation backlog, and organizations prioritizing controlled or automated remediation.
Gartner lists Reclaim Security within the Exposure Assessment Platforms category.
Get a comprehensive analysis of Reclaim Security including market position, competitive landscape, adoption trends, and peer benchmarks.
Download full report →The vendor’s website includes customer endorsements attributed to named CISOs and other individuals. These are vendor-published testimonials and should be treated as marketing collateral. Buyers should request direct reference calls and seek confirmation of measurement baselines, scope, and methodology for any quoted metrics.
Example vendor-attributed summaries (paraphrased):
These statements were published by the vendor; their measurement methods and baseline data are not publicly available.
The vendor published a PDF case study attributed to Aqua Security that includes vendor-reported results such as a large improvement in protection against phishing and other threats, a substantial reduction in time spent on security configuration management, a notable increase in ROI through optimization of existing security tools, and maintenance of business continuity during implementation.
Critical evaluation:
Reclaim Security is a Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) and automated remediation platform. Its stated capabilities include:
The vendor describes a module called PIPE (Productivity Impact Prediction Engine), which it says predicts business impact of security changes and supports automated remediation with rollback mechanisms. The vendor reports a very high accuracy figure for impact prediction; the methodology and independent validation for this figure were not found in public sources.