Reclaim Security

Name: Reclaim Security
Brand: Reclaim Security
Rating: 5 (1 reviews)

AI Native

Regain Control. Rebuild Trust. Reclaim Security.

Est 2024|Raised $26M|5 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 3K|Web traffic 5K|FTEs 26|HQ Tel Aviv, Israel

MarketsCyber Risk Management Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR)

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative analysis

Reclaim Security differentiates by emphasizing execution of remediation (closing the remediation loop) and by positioning impact prediction as a governance aid.
Tenable, Qualys, and CrowdStrike generally have broader market adoption, more telemetry sources, and larger research teams; however, customers often report that closing remediation tasks still requires significant cross-team processes.
XM Cyber differentiates through attack path analysis and simulated adversary modeling, which can be compelling for threat modeling and prioritization use cases.

- Reclaim Security differentiates by emphasizing execution of remediation (closing the remediation loop) and by positioning impact prediction as a governance aid. - Tenable, Qualys, and CrowdStrike generally have broader market adoption, more telemetry sources, and larger research teams; however, customers often report that closing remediation tasks still requires significant cross-team processes. - XM Cyber differentiates through attack path analysis and simulated adversary modeling, which can be compelling for threat modeling and prioritization use cases.

Market share and adoption trends

No credible public market share data was found for Reclaim Security specifically. Analyst listings indicate category alignment, but public indicators suggest an early-stage footprint.

	Reclaim Security	Tenable One	XM Cyber
Starting Price	Published pricing not available; vendor provides quotes	Vendor provides pricing by quote	Older third-party listings showed published entry pricing; may be outdated
Best For	Organizations prioritizing automated remediation and controlled change simulation across multiple tools	Organizations with mature vulnerability and exposure programs requiring broad scanning and reporting	Organizations focused on attack path analysis and exposure contextualization
Key Strength	Emphasis on remediation execution and impact prediction as a workflow component	Broad platform, large ecosystem, mature vulnerability research	Attack path modeling and prioritization based on exploitability
Key Weakness	Limited independent reviews; key claims lack publicly available methodology; limited public security documentation	Pricing complexity; remediation execution often left to customer workflows/tools	Potentially higher perceived cost and operationalization effort to integrate across teams