ResultsPlus

Name: ResultsPlus
Brand: ResultsPlus

ResultsPlus is a donor management and nonprofit CRM system that manages constituent records, tracks gifts, runs fundraising segmentation and reporting, and supports donor cultivation workflows.

Est 1979|9 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 41|Website|FTEs 1|HQ Rochester, Minnesota, US

MarketsCRM

01Competitive Landscape

| Aspect | ResultsPlus | DonorPerfect | Bloomerang | |--------|------------|--------------|------------| | Starting Price | Not transparently published (custom quote likely; third‑party directories cite approximate figures but not vendor‑verified) | Published entry pricing appears on some comparison pages (vendor verification varies) | Varies by record count/package; typically quote‑based | | Best For | Small/mid nonprofits seeking a traditional donor database and reporting workflows | SMB/mid‑market nonprofits that prioritize support, onboarding, and broad donor management features | Nonprofits prioritizing usability, retention‑focused donor insights, and modern UX | | Key Strength | Navigation and query/report export workflows (per positive review platform quotes) | Higher reported user satisfaction and support scores on review platforms in some comparisons; broad feature depth | Strong reputation on review platforms; often praised for usability and donor retention focus | | Key Weakness | Perceptions of limited updates; cloud/remote access concerns; unclear integration breadth | Some organizations report limitations in major gifts workflows (varies by organization) | Can become costly as needs scale; some advanced workflows may require add‑ons or integrations | - Direct competitors and differentiators - DonorPerfect vs ResultsPlus - Third‑party comparisons indicate DonorPerfect is often rated higher on overall satisfaction and support in some contexts, and it publishes entry‑level pricing on comparison pages. - Bloomerang vs ResultsPlus - Bloomerang is frequently listed as a top‑rated alternative alongside DonorPerfect on review platforms. - Feature comparison (where ResultsPlus may excel vs lag) - Potential strengths (based on available reviews/descriptions): - Straightforward navigation and query/report export workflows - Traditional CRM database tasks for gift and donor management - Potential weaknesses (based on complaints and lack of public documentation): - Cloud‑first capabilities and remote accessibility - Perceived slower product development cadence - Publicly documented enterprise security posture - Pricing comparison - DonorPerfect provides clearer entry pricing in some comparison contexts. - ResultsPlus pricing opacity increases procurement friction and complicates ROI analysis. - Market share and adoption trends - No reliable market share data for ResultsPlus was identified in accessible sources. - A limited number of public reviews suggests either a smaller modern review footprint or a less active review solicitation program.

01Competitive Landscape

Aspect	ResultsPlus	DonorPerfect	Bloomerang
Starting Price	Not transparently published (custom quote likely; third‑party directories cite approximate figures but not vendor‑verified)	Published entry pricing appears on some comparison pages (vendor verification varies)	Varies by record count/package; typically quote‑based
Best For	Small/mid nonprofits seeking a traditional donor database and reporting workflows	SMB/mid‑market nonprofits that prioritize support, onboarding, and broad donor management features	Nonprofits prioritizing usability, retention‑focused donor insights, and modern UX
Key Strength	Navigation and query/report export workflows (per positive review platform quotes)	Higher reported user satisfaction and support scores on review platforms in some comparisons; broad feature depth	Strong reputation on review platforms; often praised for usability and donor retention focus
Key Weakness	Perceptions of limited updates; cloud/remote access concerns; unclear integration breadth	Some organizations report limitations in major gifts workflows (varies by organization)	Can become costly as needs scale; some advanced workflows may require add‑ons or integrations

Direct competitors and differentiators
- DonorPerfect vs ResultsPlus
  - Third‑party comparisons indicate DonorPerfect is often rated higher on overall satisfaction and support in some contexts, and it publishes entry‑level pricing on comparison pages.
- Bloomerang vs ResultsPlus
  - Bloomerang is frequently listed as a top‑rated alternative alongside DonorPerfect on review platforms.
Feature comparison (where ResultsPlus may excel vs lag)
- Potential strengths (based on available reviews/descriptions):
  - Straightforward navigation and query/report export workflows
  - Traditional CRM database tasks for gift and donor management
- Potential weaknesses (based on complaints and lack of public documentation):
  - Cloud‑first capabilities and remote accessibility
  - Perceived slower product development cadence
  - Publicly documented enterprise security posture
Pricing comparison
- DonorPerfect provides clearer entry pricing in some comparison contexts.
- ResultsPlus pricing opacity increases procurement friction and complicates ROI analysis.
Market share and adoption trends
- No reliable market share data for ResultsPlus was identified in accessible sources.
- A limited number of public reviews suggests either a smaller modern review footprint or a less active review solicitation program.

Aspect

ResultsPlus

DonorPerfect

Bloomerang

Starting Price

Not transparently published (custom quote likely; third‑party directories cite approximate figures but not vendor‑verified)

Published entry pricing appears on some comparison pages (vendor verification varies)

Varies by record count/package; typically quote‑based

Best For

Small/mid nonprofits seeking a traditional donor database and reporting workflows

SMB/mid‑market nonprofits that prioritize support, onboarding, and broad donor management features

Nonprofits prioritizing usability, retention‑focused donor insights, and modern UX

Key Strength

Navigation and query/report export workflows (per positive review platform quotes)

Higher reported user satisfaction and support scores on review platforms in some comparisons; broad feature depth

Strong reputation on review platforms; often praised for usability and donor retention focus

Key Weakness

Perceptions of limited updates; cloud/remote access concerns; unclear integration breadth

Some organizations report limitations in major gifts workflows (varies by organization)

Can become costly as needs scale; some advanced workflows may require add‑ons or integrations