SeeTrue
Artificial Intelligence for Fast and Efficient Security Screening
MarketsPhysical Security Systems
Published Sep 16, 2026
| Starting Price | Not public (enterprise quote) | Not public (typically bundled/licensed) | Not public (program/project based) |
| Suitable for | Airports/venues seeking a third-party algorithm overlay with certification claims for select CT platforms | Organizations standardized on Smiths scanners seeking OEM-integrated algorithm modules | Buyers requiring large-scale systems integration and government contracting experience |
| Key Differentiator | Public emphasis on certification for specific CT models and an overlay approach supporting existing scanners | OEM-native integration across Smiths scanner portfolio and a broad module set | End-to-end systems integration capability and government contracting footprint |
| Key Trade-offs | Public security/compliance documentation and pricing transparency are limited; certification scope is specific to certain scanner models | Potential lock-in to Smiths ecosystem; limited public pricing transparency | May require heavier-weight procurement and program management; may not suit buyers seeking a single algorithm vendor |
SeeTrue and Smiths iCMORE both provide algorithms intended to support operator workflows and automation concepts.
Smiths iCMORE is OEM-native and is positioned for broad availability across that OEM’s scanner lines; it also references certifications and approvals in some contexts.
SeeTrue differentiates as an independent algorithm vendor and highlights certification activity tied to specific CT systems.
Among other third-party AI suppliers, OEM initiatives to onboard third-party algorithms may reduce single-vendor differentiation over time while increasing integration and certification requirements for all algorithm providers.
Where SeeTrue appears to have publicly visible strengths:
Where public documentation appears limited:
None of the major vendors in this segment publish transparent pricing. OEM ecosystem bundling (for example, an OEM offering integrated algorithms) can simplify procurement but may increase vendor lock-in.
Vendor materials report adoption indicators such as deployment counts; these are useful signals but are vendor-reported and not independently audited.