Tamigo

Name: Tamigo
Brand: Tamigo

We make workforce management easy, smart and international to enable you to grow your business

Est 2006|Valuation $3.7M|Raised $10.9M|24 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 4K|Web traffic 634K|FTEs 100|HQ Copenhagen, Capital Region, DK

MarketsTime, Attendance, & Leave Management

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitor analysis

- Versus Quinyx: Quinyx is often positioned toward enterprise workforce optimization; some third-party data shows Quinyx with a larger observed customer footprint in certain datasets, but such datasets are not comprehensive market-share measures. - Versus Planday: both vendors target shift-based work and offer scheduling-first solutions; Planday’s integration into accounting/payroll ecosystems may be relevant where those ecosystems drive procurement. This vendor emphasizes retail/hospitality KPI reporting and payroll-preparation capabilities for multi-country labor-law configuration. - Versus Deputy: Deputy provides broad hourly-workforce functionality and publishes more granular pricing detail in some markets; organizations prioritizing billing transparency and modular add-ons may prefer vendors with explicit regional pricing documentation.

Market share/adoption trends (caution)

Technographic sites estimate a relatively small detected footprint for the vendor compared with larger incumbents; such sources can undercount private deployments, subdomains, or non-public implementations and should be treated as approximate signals only.

	This Vendor	Planday	Deputy
Starting Price	Entry-level per-location/month starting tier; higher tiers move to per-location or custom enterprise pricing	Per-user/month model in many regions; some plans combine a base subscription with per-user fees	Pricing varies by plan and region; add-ons (e.g., HR, Analytics) are sold as modular fees; structure varies over time
Typical Fit	Retail/hospitality chains needing scheduling, payroll preparation, and KPI benchmarking in one WFM	Scheduling/time product with broad ecosystem focus; integration with accounting/HR ecosystems in some regions	Broad hourly workforce use cases with add-ons; strong admin tooling and global footprint
Key Strength	Multi-location retail/hospitality focus, payroll preparation and KPI benchmarking emphasis, trial availability	Clear per-user SaaS model in many regions; integration ecosystem	Extensive feature set and add-ons; large user base in some markets
Key Weakness	Public security certifications not clearly documented; review themes include payroll-export quality and mobile workflow issues	Can become costly with per-user pricing and subscription fees at scale	Pricing and packaging changes over time; add-ons and minimums can increase costs

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitor analysis

Versus Quinyx: Quinyx is often positioned toward enterprise workforce optimization; some third-party data shows Quinyx with a larger observed customer footprint in certain datasets, but such datasets are not comprehensive market-share measures.
Versus Planday: both vendors target shift-based work and offer scheduling-first solutions; Planday’s integration into accounting/payroll ecosystems may be relevant where those ecosystems drive procurement. This vendor emphasizes retail/hospitality KPI reporting and payroll-preparation capabilities for multi-country labor-law configuration.
Versus Deputy: Deputy provides broad hourly-workforce functionality and publishes more granular pricing detail in some markets; organizations prioritizing billing transparency and modular add-ons may prefer vendors with explicit regional pricing documentation.

Market share/adoption trends (caution)

	This Vendor	Planday	Deputy
Starting Price	Entry-level per-location/month starting tier; higher tiers move to per-location or custom enterprise pricing	Per-user/month model in many regions; some plans combine a base subscription with per-user fees	Pricing varies by plan and region; add-ons (e.g., HR, Analytics) are sold as modular fees; structure varies over time
Typical Fit	Retail/hospitality chains needing scheduling, payroll preparation, and KPI benchmarking in one WFM	Scheduling/time product with broad ecosystem focus; integration with accounting/HR ecosystems in some regions	Broad hourly workforce use cases with add-ons; strong admin tooling and global footprint
Key Strength	Multi-location retail/hospitality focus, payroll preparation and KPI benchmarking emphasis, trial availability	Clear per-user SaaS model in many regions; integration ecosystem	Extensive feature set and add-ons; large user base in some markets
Key Weakness	Public security certifications not clearly documented; review themes include payroll-export quality and mobile workflow issues	Can become costly with per-user pricing and subscription fees at scale	Pricing and packaging changes over time; add-ons and minimums can increase costs