TimeSolutions

Name: TimeSolutions
Brand: TimeSolutions

IT services til revisorer som gør det muligt at at opnå enorme forbedringer i deres arbejds- og personlige liv

Est 2007|4 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 258|Website|FTEs 5|HQ Capital Region, DK

MarketsProfessional Service Automation (PSA)

01Competitive Landscape

| Aspect | TimeView (TimeSolutions) | Tidsmester | TimeSolv | |--------|---------------|----------------|----------------| | Starting Price | Published per-user pricing available from the vendor; multiple packaging tiers and options are offered depending on current packaging | Published low-cost entry pricing available from the vendor; marketed as a budget option for simple time registration | Published pricing detailed in vendor materials; vendor lists multiple plans and promotions and advertises a small-team entry bundle under annual billing | | Recommended for | Danish audit and accounting firms wanting Outlook-centered time capture, document archiving, planning, and invoicing | Budget-focused Danish firms needing basic time registration across industries | Professional services (especially legal) needing cloud time + billing and integrations (US-heavy user base) | | Key Strength | Office/Outlook workflow orientation and combined practice management features (time + documents + planning + invoicing + basic CRM) | Low-cost, simple time registration offering | Established review footprint and maturity in legal billing/time tracking; published pricing and trial options | | Key Weakness | Limited independent review visibility; multiple pricing pages create buyer confusion; implementation may be heavier due to Office client/terminal server requirements | Likely lacks the broader practice-management breadth for audit firms | Primarily legal-oriented; may not match Danish audit workflows; Outlook document journaling is not a core focus | - Direct competitors and their key differentiators - Tidsmester: differentiates on price and simplicity for time registration across many industries. - TimeOps: positions as simple time registration; market materials are marketing-led and not audit-specific. - Caseware Time (and the Caseware ecosystem): deep footprint in accounting/audit; product fit varies by region and module. - Intapp Time: strong for complex time governance and integrations in larger professional services organizations but can be heavy. - Feature comparison: where this product appears to excel vs lag - Apparent strengths (based on vendor materials): - Outlook-driven time capture and archiving/journaling - Combined practice management functionality rather than a single point solution - Local market orientation for Danish audit firms - Areas where alternatives may have advantages: - Established, review-validated usability and broader ecosystem (some competitors have more third-party reviews and integrations) - Very low-cost timekeeping solutions for basic use cases - Enterprise identity and security integrations documented more extensively by some enterprise-class competitors - Pricing comparison: value proposition vs alternatives - TimeView’s published per-user pricing positions it as a practice suite rather than a minimal timekeeping application. Buyers comparing to inexpensive tools should include the cost of systems that TimeView could replace (document archiving, CRM, task planners). - Customer testimonials comparing this product to competitors - No independent comparative testimonials were found in accessible sources. - Market share and adoption trends - Independent analyst coverage was insufficient in the retrieved sources to state credible market share or broad adoption trends.

01Competitive Landscape

Aspect	TimeView (TimeSolutions)	Tidsmester	TimeSolv
Starting Price	Published per-user pricing available from the vendor; multiple packaging tiers and options are offered depending on current packaging	Published low-cost entry pricing available from the vendor; marketed as a budget option for simple time registration	Published pricing detailed in vendor materials; vendor lists multiple plans and promotions and advertises a small-team entry bundle under annual billing
Recommended for	Danish audit and accounting firms wanting Outlook-centered time capture, document archiving, planning, and invoicing	Budget-focused Danish firms needing basic time registration across industries	Professional services (especially legal) needing cloud time + billing and integrations (US-heavy user base)
Key Strength	Office/Outlook workflow orientation and combined practice management features (time + documents + planning + invoicing + basic CRM)	Low-cost, simple time registration offering	Established review footprint and maturity in legal billing/time tracking; published pricing and trial options
Key Weakness	Limited independent review visibility; multiple pricing pages create buyer confusion; implementation may be heavier due to Office client/terminal server requirements	Likely lacks the broader practice-management breadth for audit firms	Primarily legal-oriented; may not match Danish audit workflows; Outlook document journaling is not a core focus

Direct competitors and their key differentiators
- Tidsmester: differentiates on price and simplicity for time registration across many industries.
- TimeOps: positions as simple time registration; market materials are marketing-led and not audit-specific.
- Caseware Time (and the Caseware ecosystem): deep footprint in accounting/audit; product fit varies by region and module.
- Intapp Time: strong for complex time governance and integrations in larger professional services organizations but can be heavy.
Feature comparison: where this product appears to excel vs lag
- Apparent strengths (based on vendor materials):
  - Outlook-driven time capture and archiving/journaling
  - Combined practice management functionality rather than a single point solution
  - Local market orientation for Danish audit firms
- Areas where alternatives may have advantages:
  - Established, review-validated usability and broader ecosystem (some competitors have more third-party reviews and integrations)
  - Very low-cost timekeeping solutions for basic use cases
  - Enterprise identity and security integrations documented more extensively by some enterprise-class competitors
Pricing comparison: value proposition vs alternatives
- TimeView’s published per-user pricing positions it as a practice suite rather than a minimal timekeeping application. Buyers comparing to inexpensive tools should include the cost of systems that TimeView could replace (document archiving, CRM, task planners).
Customer testimonials comparing this product to competitors
- No independent comparative testimonials were found in accessible sources.
Market share and adoption trends
- Independent analyst coverage was insufficient in the retrieved sources to state credible market share or broad adoption trends.

Aspect

TimeView (TimeSolutions)

Tidsmester

TimeSolv

Starting Price

Published per-user pricing available from the vendor; multiple packaging tiers and options are offered depending on current packaging

Published low-cost entry pricing available from the vendor; marketed as a budget option for simple time registration

Published pricing detailed in vendor materials; vendor lists multiple plans and promotions and advertises a small-team entry bundle under annual billing

Recommended for

Danish audit and accounting firms wanting Outlook-centered time capture, document archiving, planning, and invoicing

Budget-focused Danish firms needing basic time registration across industries

Professional services (especially legal) needing cloud time + billing and integrations (US-heavy user base)

Key Strength

Office/Outlook workflow orientation and combined practice management features (time + documents + planning + invoicing + basic CRM)

Low-cost, simple time registration offering

Established review footprint and maturity in legal billing/time tracking; published pricing and trial options

Key Weakness

Limited independent review visibility; multiple pricing pages create buyer confusion; implementation may be heavier due to Office client/terminal server requirements

Likely lacks the broader practice-management breadth for audit firms

Primarily legal-oriented; may not match Danish audit workflows; Outlook document journaling is not a core focus