Total Synergy

Name: Total Synergy
Brand: Total Synergy
Rating: 4.5 (56 reviews)

Simplifying how architects and engineers plan, manage, and deliver profitable projects.

Est 1999|50 Ref Customers

LinkedIn 4K|Website|Web traffic 201K|FTEs 75|HQ Sydney, New South Wales, AU

MarketsProfessional Service Automation (PSA)Invoicing & Payment Processing

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

Total Synergy vs Factor AE (same parent ecosystem): - Factor AE is positioned as a simpler product with clearer per-user pricing and a single-plan approach, which can appeal to SMB firms prioritizing price transparency and quick onboarding. Total Synergy offers tiered plans and optional add-ons that can be advantageous for firms seeking broader functionality and scalability controls such as higher API call limits. Total Synergy vs Deltek Ajera: - Total Synergy differentiates itself through integration-focused workflows (integrated project management and the ability to sync with external GLs), while Deltek Ajera is commonly selected by firms seeking a deeper ERP-oriented project accounting solution. Comparative ratings on vendor review sites should be examined for reviewer profile and recency to determine relevance to a specific buyer. Total Synergy vs Monograph: - Monograph is focused on smaller A&E firms with emphasis on simplified workflows and visibility. Monograph may be preferable for teams prioritizing lightweight UX and fast deployment; Total Synergy may be preferred by firms that require broader practice management breadth and enterprise-aimed add-ons.

Adoption trends / market signals (limited)

Public review data suggests a reviewer base skewed toward small businesses. The vendor’s self-published user counts and recent investment activity by third-party financial investors indicate growth intent and a push toward increased North American presence.

	Total Synergy (Synergy)	Factor AE	BQE CORE
Starting Price	Not publicly listed on vendor plans page; quote-based (likely)	Publicly documented per-user pricing on vendor site (historical snapshot); may vary	Emphasizes request-a-quote for pricing; not a simple public sticker price
Best For	A&E firms needing integrated practice management, project financials, forecasting, and optional add-ons (PIM/HR/CRM)	Small–mid A&E firms seeking a simpler, transparent per-user pricing model and rapid onboarding	A&E/consulting firms requiring mature PSA with a broad module ecosystem (accounting/CRM/HR/payroll)
Key Strength	A&E-specific workflows; Azure cloud foundation; modular add-ons and API access	Simpler pricing model and single-plan visibility for core features	Broad functionality and established market presence in PSA/project accounting
Key Weakness	Public pricing opacity; implementation/setup costs; reporting and integration limitations reported by some users	May offer fewer enterprise ERP features compared to larger platforms; one-time implementation fees may apply	Public pricing can be opaque; can become complex/expensive depending on required modules

01Competitive Landscape

Narrative competitive analysis

Total Synergy vs Factor AE (same parent ecosystem):

Factor AE is positioned as a simpler product with clearer per-user pricing and a single-plan approach, which can appeal to SMB firms prioritizing price transparency and quick onboarding. Total Synergy offers tiered plans and optional add-ons that can be advantageous for firms seeking broader functionality and scalability controls such as higher API call limits.

Total Synergy vs Deltek Ajera:

Total Synergy differentiates itself through integration-focused workflows (integrated project management and the ability to sync with external GLs), while Deltek Ajera is commonly selected by firms seeking a deeper ERP-oriented project accounting solution. Comparative ratings on vendor review sites should be examined for reviewer profile and recency to determine relevance to a specific buyer.

Total Synergy vs Monograph:

Monograph is focused on smaller A&E firms with emphasis on simplified workflows and visibility. Monograph may be preferable for teams prioritizing lightweight UX and fast deployment; Total Synergy may be preferred by firms that require broader practice management breadth and enterprise-aimed add-ons.

Adoption trends / market signals (limited)

Public review data suggests a reviewer base skewed toward small businesses. The vendor’s self-published user counts and recent investment activity by third-party financial investors indicate growth intent and a push toward increased North American presence.

	Total Synergy (Synergy)	Factor AE	BQE CORE
Starting Price	Not publicly listed on vendor plans page; quote-based (likely)	Publicly documented per-user pricing on vendor site (historical snapshot); may vary	Emphasizes request-a-quote for pricing; not a simple public sticker price
Best For	A&E firms needing integrated practice management, project financials, forecasting, and optional add-ons (PIM/HR/CRM)	Small–mid A&E firms seeking a simpler, transparent per-user pricing model and rapid onboarding	A&E/consulting firms requiring mature PSA with a broad module ecosystem (accounting/CRM/HR/payroll)
Key Strength	A&E-specific workflows; Azure cloud foundation; modular add-ons and API access	Simpler pricing model and single-plan visibility for core features	Broad functionality and established market presence in PSA/project accounting
Key Weakness	Public pricing opacity; implementation/setup costs; reporting and integration limitations reported by some users	May offer fewer enterprise ERP features compared to larger platforms; one-time implementation fees may apply	Public pricing can be opaque; can become complex/expensive depending on required modules