Keep

Name: Keep
Brand: Keep
Rating: 3.7 (135 reviews)

AI Native

An all-in-one finance system for small and medium sized Canadian businesses.

Est 2021|Raised $106.7M

LinkedIn 14K|Web traffic 46K|FTEs 125|HQ Toronto, Ontario, CA

MarketsExpense Management Corporate Card Management

Published Oct 2, 2026

01Common complaints

- If your organization requires publicly documented, audited security and compliance certifications (SOC 2/ISO 27001) prior to engagement: public materials reviewed did not disclose these certifications. - If the business is very new (under about six months) or lacks bank transaction history: underwriting requirements may exclude very new entities. - If you require predictable subscription-style pricing with minimal transaction-based fees: some competitors publish tiered pricing and explicit FX fees that may be preferable for cost modeling. - If you are scaling into complex enterprise needs (detailed policy engines, procurement workflows, SSO/SCIM provisioning, and granular audit trails): consider enterprise spend suites or bank-led commercial card programs. - If your operations cannot tolerate operational constraints on spend availability: user reports of an inability to add funds suggest potential for disruption in some cases.

Known limitations (from accessible sources)

Eligibility constraint: Underwriting reportedly requires approximately six months of business bank transactions.
Operational reliability concerns (reported by some users): At least one review states inability to add funds, requiring use of personal cards as a workaround.

Roadmap visibility

No public product roadmap with specific dates was found in the sources reviewed.

Security and compliance visibility limitations

Public SOC 2 or ISO 27001 claims for Keep (trykeep.com) were not found in the sources reviewed; similarly named Keep* products do have published SOC 2 claims, which can cause buyer confusion. Verification with the vendor is recommended.

02Why they buy

Differentiators supported by available evidence (with caveats)

- **Canada-focused corporate card and spend platform:** The vendor presents itself and is reported in press coverage as focused on the Canadian SMB market. - **Multi-currency capabilities:** Press coverage and product descriptions reference multi-currency accounts and cross-border operations as part of the offering. - **Reported onboarding speed for some users:** User anecdotes on community forums and some reviews indicate rapid underwriting and card issuance in some cases.

Areas where competitors may show clearer advantages

Pricing transparency: Some competitors publish explicit tiered pricing and FX fee information.
Published security and enterprise controls: Larger or more mature spend vendors often provide more extensive published security documentation and admin capabilities (varies by vendor and plan).

03Field reports

Review platform coverage note

Searches did not find product listings for Keep on some enterprise review platforms; results often surfaced similarly named products (for example, “Keep Aware”).
Clear, attributable listings were located on Trustpilot for the vendor's website, and community discussion threads on Reddit addressed user experiences.

Positive feedback (examples)

Trustpilot reviewers described positive experiences with application processing speed and features such as virtual cards and spend controls.
On Reddit, some users reported faster-than-expected responses and card delivery within a short timeframe.

Negative feedback / lower ratings (examples)

Trustpilot includes very low-star reviews reporting operational issues (for example, inability to add funds) and concerns about contacting support.
Reddit threads include questions about legitimacy and note underwriting requirements such as needing several months of business history or bank transactions, indicating the product may not be suitable for very new entities.

Common reasons customers choose Keep (from reviews and discussions)

Reported faster underwriting/approval in some cases
Reported higher credit limits compared with some banks (as stated by users)
Virtual card issuance and spend controls
Integrated workflows (card, expenses, and accounting sync) reported by some users

Common reasons customers hesitate or churn (inferred from complaints)

Funding or credit availability problems (for example, inability to add funds)
Difficulty locating support contact paths
Eligibility constraints for very new businesses
Potential mismatch for larger or more complex enterprise control requirements (not well documented publicly)

Vendor-published metrics and gaps

Keep’s publicly displayed metrics (for example, platform processed volume and customer counts) are vendor-published and were not independently audited in the sources reviewed.
Press reporting provides additional figures (for example, customer counts and revenue figures) attributed to media coverage rather than audited financial statements.

What is missing

Public, detailed case studies with methodology (baseline, timeframe, controls) were not found in the sources reviewed.
Recommendation for procurement: request customer references in your industry and ask for quantifiable outcomes (for example, reductions in close time, reimbursement cycle time, or documented FX savings with before-and-after comparisons).

04Best fit

Company sizes

Likely best fit: small and mid-sized businesses with consistent operating spend, multiple cardholders, and a desire for bookkeeping automation.
Based on underwriting requirements (a minimal transaction history), an implied fit is businesses with a short but established operating history and regular bank activity.

Industries

SMBs that incur online service expenses, inventory purchases, shipping, travel, or have cross-border payment needs.

Buyer personas

Founder / CEO (seeking working capital and card facilities)
Finance lead / controller / bookkeeper (seeking spend visibility, receipt matching, and accounting sync)
Operations / administrative managers (responsible for issuing cards to teams)

Qualification criteria indicating a good fit

Needs multiple physical and virtual cards with configurable limits
Prefers an integrated card plus expense management tool rather than separate bank card and expense software
Has adequate transaction history to satisfy underwriting requirements

Disqualifiers

Newly formed companies lacking a minimal transaction history
Organizations requiring publicly available audited security certifications (for example, SOC 2 or ISO 27001) before engaging vendors
Large enterprises requiring mature SSO/SCIM provisioning, detailed audit logs, and complex procurement workflows without additional vendor validation

05The pitch

What the product does (objective value proposition)

Keep is a Canadian SMB-focused finance platform centered on a corporate credit card plus spend and expense controls and adjacent financial services (for example, multi-currency accounts, payments, and lending/capital). The product is intended to consolidate business spending, tracking, and payments in a single platform while providing higher credit limits than traditional banks and stating no fees for the core platform.

Target market and market positioning

- **Primary target:** Canadian small and mid-sized businesses (SMBs), including startups and companies that conduct international transactions. - **Positioning:** An integrated corporate card, expense management, multi-currency account, and growth capital offering positioned as a Canada-focused analogue to US corporate card/spend platforms (Ramp/Brex), with localization for Canadian regulatory and market needs. Keep competes with other Canada-native fintech corporate card providers as well as bank-issued business cards.

Get a comprehensive analysis of Keep including market position, competitive landscape, adoption trends, and peer benchmarks.

Download full report →